Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Living Ohio man Donald Miller ruled 'legally dead'
BBC ^ | October 10, 2013 | Staff

Posted on 10/11/2013 9:26:23 AM PDT by Twotone

A US man declared dead after he disappeared nearly three decades ago cannot now be declared officially alive, though he has returned home and is in good health, a judge has ruled.

Donald Miller of Ohio left behind a wife, two children and significant debt when he fled his home in 1986.

He was declared legally dead in 1994, then re-emerged in 2005 and attempted to apply for a driving licence.

A judge this week found death rulings cannot be overturned after three years.

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Who instituted this 'three year rule', I wonder?
1 posted on 10/11/2013 9:26:23 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This is rare: a judge interpreting the law AS IT IS WRITTEN.


2 posted on 10/11/2013 9:27:41 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

"I havnae seen me willy in three years,
it could be declared legally daid!"

3 posted on 10/11/2013 9:29:16 AM PDT by Old Sarge (And Good Evening, Agent Smith, wherever you are...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

So he can’t be taxed. Of course he could still vote in any Democrat precinct anywhere. Probably multiple times.


4 posted on 10/11/2013 9:30:23 AM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone
I'm inclined to think banks so people could not crap out on paying house notes and loans. Seriously there are lots of interests that need to be resolved if someone is missing for a long period of time. Children, spouses need some sort of legal closure. I am not sure what will be done in this very odd case. I suggest he change his name and let the court take legal notice of his new name and consider it a new identity. Although there are legal problems there also.
What is while he was absent he killed someone. Can he be tried now?
5 posted on 10/11/2013 9:37:39 AM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

If he abandoned his family to drown in their debts, he does not deserve to be reinstated to the living IMO.


6 posted on 10/11/2013 9:37:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

There’s any number of opportunities on cable&insane TV these days..

he could do a cameo on ‘The Walking Dead..

Alex Baldwin needs a sidekick for his new show on pmslsdnbc..

or.. my fave..

being a true DemocRat 2014 and 2016 dead voter..

Priceless.


7 posted on 10/11/2013 9:41:21 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I am with you on this one.


8 posted on 10/11/2013 9:49:36 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: prof.h.mandingo

It may have been something the banks requested, but it looks like the state passed legislation. It still makes no sense. People take off & go missing for years. Why declare them dead? Instead, they should’ve declared his wife & family abandoned. She could’ve declared bankruptcy & gone on with her life.

I certainly agree he should still be held accountable now that he’s re-appeared. But it’s a very odd way to handle the entire situation. And ABSURD to declare an obviously living person has to stay dead. Sheesh!


9 posted on 10/11/2013 10:00:50 AM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Twotone; All

Hmmmm ..??

Why not change your name - get a new SS#, and deprive your former widow of receiving any of your SS dollars you earn in the future.


10 posted on 10/11/2013 10:31:03 AM PDT by CyberAnt (MY AMERICA: "... I'm terrified it's slipping away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

It looks as if we have our first official Zombie. The living dead-who would have thought it possible


11 posted on 10/11/2013 10:37:13 AM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Worth it so that he no longer has to pay income taxes.


12 posted on 10/11/2013 10:50:20 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Howdy to all you government agents spying on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Well, on the upside, he is now exempt from taxes.


13 posted on 10/11/2013 10:51:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

My Favorite Wife remake?


14 posted on 10/11/2013 11:23:37 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

Judge Allan Davis handed down the ruling in Hancock County, Ohio, probate court on Monday, calling it a “strange, strange situation”, according to media reports.

“We’ve got the obvious here. A man sitting in the courtroom, he appears to be in good health,’’ he said, finding that he was prevented by state law from declaring Mr Miller legally alive.

“I don’t know where that leaves you, but you’re still deceased as far as the law is concerned.”

I think you may be right. He’s the living dead or ... the unliving living...or maybe we now have a bonifide, proved-in-court Schrodinger’s cat.

Once again. the law proves it is an a**.

P.S.: The court would change its tune soon enough if he killed someone.


15 posted on 10/11/2013 1:25:18 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort Today forges Tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

Judge Allan Davis handed down the ruling in Hancock County, Ohio, probate court on Monday, calling it a “strange, strange situation”, according to media reports.

“We’ve got the obvious here. A man sitting in the courtroom, he appears to be in good health,’’ he said, finding that he was prevented by state law from declaring Mr Miller legally alive.

“I don’t know where that leaves you, but you’re still deceased as far as the law is concerned.”

***********

I think you may be right. He’s the living dead or ... the unliving living...or maybe we now have a bonifide, proved-in-court Schrodinger’s cat.

Once again. the law proves it is an a**.

P.S.: The court would change its tune soon enough if he killed someone.


16 posted on 10/11/2013 1:28:23 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Because if they’re not dead then nobody can inherit their property. There’s a lot of vital paperwork portion of the wife getting to go on with her life that works a lot better with a death certificate.

Where he “has to” stay dead is in stuff like that inherited property, he can’t get it back now. He’ll still be able to do stuff, but he gets to start from scratch, all his social security went to the wife, all his property, he’s at zero. It’s not an odd way to handle the situation, it’s the only way to handle the situation, do you want to suddenly make his wife pay pack everything that she got because he was thought dead?


17 posted on 10/11/2013 1:35:53 PM PDT by discostu (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

An article from yesterday;

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3077446/posts

From the ABC article:

http://abcnews.go.com/Weird/wireStory/ohio-judge-tells-man-legally-dead-20534083

snip
His ex-wife had opposed the move, saying she doesn’t have the money to repay the
Social Security benefits that were paid out to her and the couple’s two children
after Miller was declared dead.

Robin Miller said her former husband vanished because he owed big child support
payments and that the overdue payments had totaled $26,000 by 1994, The (Findlay)
Courier reported.

end snip


18 posted on 10/11/2013 1:48:42 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Who instituted this ‘three year rule’, I wonder?

************

Apparently it’s a state law.....


19 posted on 10/11/2013 1:52:06 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Time’s Up: Statute of Limitations

Under a legal rule known as the “statute of limitations,” a legal claim must be
brought within a certain time limit.

http://blogs.findlaw.com/legally_weird/2013/10/too-late-for-ohio-man-to-prove-hes-not-dead-judge.html


20 posted on 10/11/2013 2:05:26 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson