Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The Commander-in-Chief gets to command US forces.

If he wants to command them against a sovereign state recognized by the US as legitimate, then Congress has to declare a state of war.

Otherwise, the President is in charge of the armed forces as long as Congress decides to keep paying for them.

4 posted on 09/01/2013 11:39:05 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
"The Commander-in-Chief gets to command US forces."

Like tin soldiers.........

26 posted on 09/01/2013 12:33:12 PM PDT by hummingbird (Don't be afraid of the big words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake

“If he wants to command them against a sovereign state recognized by the US as legitimate, then Congress has to declare a state of war.”

Here’s my understanding. The president can engage any country for 90 days. By that time Congress must either declare war or back the president. If they don’t he has to stop.

Having said that, I don’t think there’s any mechanism to force the president to stop. Our system worked because all sides obeyed the law and the Constitution. If the president continues and the Senate will not convict on impeachment then I see no way to stop Obama.


31 posted on 09/01/2013 12:36:34 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson