Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Missing Shame in American Society
Clash Daily ^ | 8-11-13 | Stephanie Janiczek

Posted on 08/12/2013 5:58:09 AM PDT by ReformationFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: ReformationFan

Things change constantly.

Not too long ago, the majority of Americans believed that gun liberty would result in rampant gun crime and violence.

In the 1950s, congress investigated EC horror comics for influencing children to commit horrible crimes, not grasping that the comics were so horrible that they were funny, and that “bad guys” were always punished in the end, much like the Hays Code for films.

Etc. But it all leads up to sexuality and pornography.

Statistics clearly show that heterosexual, monogamous marriage is far better for children than being raised by a single parent.

But society is still catching up to something it does *not* want to hear, but is a glaring truth. People have a finite supply of energy, focused on procreation and the raising of children.

Yet if people use up too much of that energy on frivolous sexuality, they have less to devote to their children.

Some people have large amounts of energy, but even they are stressed by having and raising children. Many or perhaps even most have *enough* energy, if they conserve it, to have and raise children. But many never had enough energy to do so.

Bluntly, there are many people who should never have children, and a subset of those who should never even have sex, because they have barely enough energy to live.

The human species may actually have a biological reason for things like homosexuality, prostitution, and post-menopausal sexuality. Basically as distractions for those who should not reproduce, so that they do not interfere with those who *should* reproduce. So that they do not interfere with monogamous, heterosexual marriage.

But what about pornography?

Not surprisingly, an abundance of pornography may result in people not wanting to have sex so much. For those who shouldn’t or can’t breed, no problem. However, those who should marry and have children should strictly avoid false sexual stimulation, *or* non-reproductive sex until they are done reproducing and raising their children.

How this latter goal is achieved is the important thing, because it is determinate of human future generations.


41 posted on 08/12/2013 8:10:30 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Haven’t you heard? This is the age of attention whores!


42 posted on 08/12/2013 8:24:05 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Whittle, affiliated with PJTV, has some magnificent speeches he has given, he is a highly engaging and funny speaker. He can go back and forth between funny and dead serious in a subtle yet powerful way and I myself like him a lot. Kind of like Mark Steyn, though not so frivolous. Available on YouTube, if you are interested. He recently gave this speech about the assumed moral superiority of the left. Twas good, maybe not one of his best, but he raised this superiority point and I think it is a good one. He makes this point that this is a valid point of attack in lib argument: This assumed moral superiority is absolutely unearned. Like many other things in their bag of tricks.

His analysis of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings was spot on in terms of refuting the handwringing, constant review we have to hear every year at this time. (Came out last year or yr before) Reco you look it up on YT.


43 posted on 08/12/2013 9:25:28 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Both parties are trying to elect a new PEOPLE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
“Who are YOU to decide what culture/person/trait/habit/activity is good or not? Goodness is what I think it is...”

But people who say that have their own set of rules and will judge you for violating it. Try saying, "Who are you to decide that I can't favor white males when I hire people?" "Who are you to decide that I can't be pro-life?" "Who are you to decide that I can't own a gun?" And on and on. Then they become the most judgmental people on earth.

44 posted on 08/12/2013 10:51:07 AM PDT by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood

Exactly. It is like freedom of speech. It is a one way ratchet for liberal.

It is only freedom of speech if you agree with them. Otherwise, it is “Hate Speech”.


45 posted on 08/12/2013 3:02:58 PM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Back in the days of Freeping the Clintons at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, I had a sign with a picture of George Washington with a big tear rolling down his face and the word SHAME.

One day an attractive suburban mother walked by with her young daughter who saw my sign and asked her what “Shame” was. I heard the woman hem and haw and sputter helplessly all the way down the sidewalk - she had no idea.


46 posted on 08/12/2013 6:34:45 PM PDT by Wife of D28Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson