One possible answer to the Boy Scout dilemma is for us to (repulsive as it is) act more liberal.
By this, I mean that we can lie about our selection of leaders. (”We didn’t reject Bawny Fwank because he boinks our kids, we rejected him because he has the IQ of a slime mold and the morals of mbnbc employees.”)
We can lie about reasons for terminating leaders. (”We fired Mr Fudgepack because we found him using politically incorrect language...and he actually listened to Rush.”)
We can lie in court if sued. (”I cannot recall, and besides, what difference does it make?”)
After all, lying is the centerstone of liberalism.
Let’s use it.
Really.
Let’s use it.
Really."
Is that a rooster I hear crowing ?