[DManA]

Mind you, I have kind of an admiration for these guys who can take nothing and turn it into a plausible something (this is not an example of that).

They are inventive, they have imagination. You can say they cheat because they make stuff up but, I’m kind of a connoisseur of B.S ( but I never lose track of the fact that it’s B.S).

[Utilizer]

Agreed, however just a bit of common sence is not too much to ask, is it? I mean, I like Richard Hoagland (sp?) very much but must confess nonetheless that I cannot see some of the structures he claims exist.

You can look at any part of the sky and make out a triangle of stars, and a polyhedron is not that much more difficult. Much more determined beyond Orion's belt and you are really straining to make the portrayal. I remember years ago reading a cartoon-book about Donald Duck's formative years, and the illustrators made a valid representation of a section of stars showing the points made up of a duck -a duck with his fists up! 'Struth, mate.