Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Larry381

No duty to protect? Then what are we paying them for?


42 posted on 08/03/2013 7:39:47 AM PDT by k4gypsyrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: k4gypsyrose; All

“No duty to protect? Then what are we paying them for?”

Not duty to protect *you*. They have a duty to protect “society at large”, which translated means “follow orders and protect the government”.

Nowhere have I seen a court mention that they have a duty to protect the Constitution, which they take an oath to do.


43 posted on 08/03/2013 7:47:27 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: k4gypsyrose
to eat doughnuts and shoot dogs...
44 posted on 08/03/2013 7:54:22 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson