Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

You gotta wonder why the first words from the oncologists mouth after giving patients the bad news isn’t “stop eating sugar to increase your chances of survival”.


6 posted on 07/08/2013 6:22:47 PM PDT by numberonepal (First they came for Sarah, then they came for Herman.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: numberonepal

Exactly.

I also know a smoker who has mysteriously lost a severe amount of weight. If I were him I would want a full cancer screening. You don’t just loose a ton of weight without something using that energy.


9 posted on 07/08/2013 6:41:08 PM PDT by pennyfarmer (Your socialist beat our liberal AGAIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal

All energy sources are converted into sugar before your cells burn it. You can’t starve a tumor.

However, processed sugars no doubt cause unnatural sugar spikes. I wouldn’t be surprised if cancer is more likely to begin in a high sugar environment


15 posted on 07/08/2013 6:51:06 PM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: numberonepal
You gotta wonder why the first words from the oncologists mouth after giving patients the bad news isn’t “stop eating sugar to increase your chances of survival”.

Indeed. The amount of evidence that exists to show that cancer feeds on sugars would lead one to the conclusion that anything that drives insulin will promote cancer - to put it in simple terms.

Instead, the first option is, generally, to offer a treatment (chemo) that is, itself, carcinogenic?!?!

32 posted on 07/08/2013 8:09:49 PM PDT by RobertClark (My shrink just killed himself - he blamed me in his note!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson