Posted on 06/07/2013 8:38:32 AM PDT by JoeProBono
Do Amish play football?
He'd probably be hitting on guys LOL.
Is the same guy who made the rounds on tv shows in 2010? If it is then later he tried to land a reality show but in a uproar Oxygen cancelled it before airing.
The reality show was someone else: http://freddyo.com/oxygen-cancels-shawty-lo-reality-special-all-my-babies-mamas/reality-tv/
But this guy was on some news channels before.
Why did I just know, something along these lines was bound to come out? Sorry, I ain't buying it.
The most effective form of birth control is for you men to keep it in your pants - and if you don't be prepared to pay the consequences.
So when is he going to prosecuted for bigamy and/or polygamy?
>>>The most effective form of birth control is for you men to keep it in your pants - and if you don’t be prepared to pay the consequences. <<<
That “keep it in your pants or be prepared to pay the consequences” system is the current system. How is that working out?
In the roughly 50 years we’ve been doing it that way the out of wedlock birth rate and number of mothers on public assistance have soared. It simply does not work.
Men SHOULD “keep it in their pants”, but the fact is, all too often they don’t and the taxpayers end up paying the price.
We need to tell the women to “keep it OUT of THEIR pants” or pay the consequences. That system worked fairly well for many centuries, until the Sexual (Immorality) Revolution of the 1960s.
And if you think my views on gender roles are antiquated and barbaric, fine. Let’s be progressive and all gender neutral about it. Let’s let Mr. Shaw stay home and care for his 22 kids, while the 14 baby momma’s go out to work to support them (and, effectively him).
That model makes a whole lot more financial sense. There is no way Mr. Shaw could earn the $7,000 per month, but each of the 14 baby mommas would only need to earn $500 a month.
You men are the ones that made the laws - start accepting responsibility for the problems YOU have caused. You obviously want the system back to where it was and only women paid the price - well go take a flying leap.
No, I want people to STOP having children out of wedlock.
As long as Urban Culture celebrates and Government rewards behavior like this, it will not change.
That's not the take I've gotten from your comments here - you want women to stop having children out of wedlock, but accept the idea it is "normal" for men to get what they want, when they want, and where they can with no responsibility.
It takes 2 to create a child, even if only one gives birth - they are both equally responsible for the act that created the child. You seem to be having trouble with that little fact.
>>>That’s not the take I’ve gotten from your comments here - you want women to stop having children out of wedlock, but accept the idea it is “normal” for men to get what they want, when they want, and where they can with no responsibility.
It takes 2 to create a child, even if only one gives birth - they are both equally responsible for the act that created the child. You seem to be having trouble with that little fact.<<<
I don’t believe it is normal for men to get what they want. I think it is “normal” (as in typical, but morally wrong and irresponsible) for many or most men to take what they can get sexually. It is (or at least was) “normal” (and morally good and responsible) for women to, more often than not prevent men, that they are not married to, from “getting what they want” sexually.
This is not about placing blame. When a child is born out of wedlock and man and woman are both responsible.
I am simply trying to be realistic about what will and will not work in preventing out of wedlock pregnancies.
History has shown that the prospect of a financial burden will NOT cause most of the men who are producing out of wedlock children to “keep it in their pants”.
On the other hand, history has shown that when women knew they could count on no financial support, either from their Baby Daddy or Uncle Sugar, the vast majority somehow avoided becoming pregnant outside of wedlock.
I am not insulting women, as a whole. If anything, I am saying that, when properly motivated, they have more self-control in this area than men.
Horse manure - you are just totally insulting to everyone who doesn't agree with everything you say and how you believe everyone should live their lives.
On the other hand, history has shown that when women knew they could count on no financial support, either from their Baby Daddy or Uncle Sugar, the vast majority somehow avoided becoming pregnant outside of wedlock.
And both scenarios are because of the laws made by the MEN who can't or won't keep it in their pants.
The current laws about how things are were made by men, so don't go blaming the women for what you've done. And the same goes for being unable to keep it in your pants.
Maybe not HPV oral cancer, okay I'll give you that.
But they can get HPV condylomas (veneral warts) of the genital and anal regions which become malignant.
I wonder who he voted for?
And the mothers?
See my post #25...
Yes, and that was the common law and the statute law of all 50 states until 1973.
In that year, the SAME Court in the SAME term that decided Roe v. Wade ALSO invalidated the bastardy laws of all 50 states in Gomez v. Perez.
The court discovered in the Constitution the right of whores to receive cash and prizes for their whoredom, "for the children".
Roe v. Wade...
The women made their “choice”... now they have to live with it. I guess they will have to get a job - - or just give the babies to their daddy...
What criminal statute has this pile of garbage violated?
None.
If a girl at a party makes the announcement she is giving out free nookie, what crime is there?
This behavior is enabled by liberal welfare policies.
If the women didn’t have welfare and gov’t assistance to rely on if the guy who fathers their kids skips out - they wouldn’t be having sex with him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.