Posted on 05/15/2013 3:05:10 PM PDT by Morgana
A Syrian rebel militia leader filmed cutting the heart and organs out of a regime soldier’s corpse and putting it in his mouth has defended his actions as legitimate vengeance.
The actions of Khaled al-Hamad, known by the nom de guerre Abu Sakkar, handed an instant propaganda victory to the Syriangovenrment, which accused the West of ignoring rebel atrocities.
The video purported to show the leader of a breakaway rebel faction cutting the lungs out of a soldier’s corpse before apparently eating a small piece of the organ.
(Excerpt) Read more at cpnagasaki.wordpress.com ...
If it’s done in the name of Allah...it’s ok. NO SARCASM INTENDED.
It’s okay to eat human but not pig? Yea, right.
Soylent Islam is PEOPLE!
Allah works in mysterious ways../s
Islam allows eating apostates providing the flesh is not cooked.
http://shoebat.com/2013/01/28/islam-and-cannibalism/
Horrific. Both sides are detestable.
You are correct. This story just came out a few months ago:
In a recent video interview, one Egyptian scholar exposed the high school curriculum coming from Al-Azhar university, the most reputable of all Islamic schools, showing that it condoned cannibalizing non-Muslims:
“We allowed the eating of the flesh of dead humans… under necessary conditions. It [dead human flesh] must not be cooked or grilled to avoid Haram (wrongdoing) …and he can kill a murtadd (apostate) and eat him”
...
Al-Azhar finds their support for cannibalism in Islamic authority. According to Al-Shafie, who is considered to be the founder of Islamic jurisprudence:
“One may eat the flesh of a human body. It is not allowed to kill a Muslim nor a free non-Muslim under Muslim rule (because he is useful for the society), nor a prisoner because he belongs to other Muslims. But you may kill an enemy fighter or an adulterer and eat his body (716 in volume 1, Al-Kortoby)”
http://shoebat.com/2013/01/28/islam-and-cannibalism/
So, according to this Sharia interpretation, this cannibalism is fine because the man was an enemy fighter.
You wouldn’t expect a hungry guy to eat that ham and cheese
on rye sitting in that zip-lok bag next to that dead body, would
you?
This reminded me of the American soldier in Iraq who got a new tattoo on his butt:
MAY CONTAIN PORK PRODUCTS
Note to self.....when arguing with Muslims never say, ‘Eat Me’, they apparently take it literally.
Long pork vs short pork.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.