Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Obama Birth Certificates Surface In Alabama Eligibility Case
freedom outpost ^ | May 1, 2013 | Tim Brown

Posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE

The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.

Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.

Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:

“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”

But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: afterbirtherbs; alabama; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; cairmsm; certifigate; destroyeconomy; dirtystatedept; eligibilitycase; fogbow; fraud; fundbrotherhood; jail; muslimbrotherhood; nationalsecurity; naturalborncitizen; obama; obotbs; obotsaretrolls; obotspaidtodisrupt; plannedattack; roymoore; saudipuppet; ushijacked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last
To: Puppage
"there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed."

So do we repeal them in order to find out what's in them too!

21 posted on 05/01/2013 8:30:48 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

What is the graphic which only appears as a grayish square?
I am unable to enlarge it, to view it.
Simply put two birth certificates that are different, one is fake.
I thinks its funny that some people buy the race of the father as “African”, it should have been “Negro”.


22 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:00 AM PDT by svcw (If you are dead when your heart stops, why aren't you alive when it starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Allen West “The Obama administration is indeed aiding, enabling, and abetting our enemy thread
23 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:16 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

Bread and circuses. A bunch of distraction created to cloud the real issue.

Fact: All the people in Congress KNOW the truth. The CIA has files on everyone who runs for office.

Thus every person in Congress is complicit. Legally.

That is a problem.

So they do the show you see, drag it out with side issues that can be fought and claim it’s ‘settled science and old news” when anyone brings up the real issue...because most people don’t KNOW the real issue. Thus anyone with a clue is mocked and made to look like a ‘Truther”.


24 posted on 05/01/2013 8:31:40 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“It’s funny, because if they ever find that Obama was not eligible to hold the office of the Presidency, there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed.”

I hear you but given the current environment who would force such a constitutional crisis besides maybe a handful of House members? Unfortunately the bread and circuses would continue. Nothing would happen.

Having said that we should never give up and we should document the truth - whatever it is - and get it in the public record. Maybe someone someday may give a rip and be able to use it.


25 posted on 05/01/2013 8:32:24 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh, he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....


26 posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:13 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The longer we wait, the more it’ll hurt. With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed. Americans are tough, we’ll get through.

I do agree with you, however. No one has the spine to push this issue.


27 posted on 05/01/2013 8:34:31 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Yes good point. If a crime was committed than criminal prosecution of specific crimes may be more effective. Same approach used to bring down the mob.


28 posted on 05/01/2013 8:38:36 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Stripes and pink underwear. It would be my pleasure!


29 posted on 05/01/2013 8:39:19 AM PDT by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Patriots should never give up on this fight. Regardless if the fraud serves his whole four years, it’s the most stark example of how our ruling class is corrupt beyond redemption. They must be brought down.


30 posted on 05/01/2013 8:42:53 AM PDT by kreitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool; EXCH54FE

isthisnickcool wrote:

This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman.

Klayman burned up about $100 million on lawsuits that NEVER went anywhere when he was at Judicial Watch. If he is involved this is going nowhere. Oh,he will collect a lot of money from people to chase this kind of stuff down. But it will never go anywhere. Just Larry doing fundraising.....”

This concerned me also, but this time we have judge Moore.

So there may be a chance that klayman gets this one.

(FRmail incoming)


31 posted on 05/01/2013 8:43:34 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
He would be liable for ALL expenses incurred on his lavish vacations.

This one alone would be worth it.

32 posted on 05/01/2013 8:44:01 AM PDT by Only1choice____Freedom (As long as America's tolerence of failure is not overwhelmed by a desire to succeed, we will fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”


Yeah, Judicial Watch and Klayman are like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.

We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.


33 posted on 05/01/2013 8:46:16 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

“So do we repeal them in order to find out what’s in them too!”

That there is funny.

I’ll see you and raise you one.

At this point what does it matter?


34 posted on 05/01/2013 8:48:30 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

There would be all the EOs


35 posted on 05/01/2013 8:50:27 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

didn’t Pelosi certify this birth ce4rtificate? What about arresting her too?


36 posted on 05/01/2013 8:55:57 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“With Kagan and Sotomayor on the bench illegally, there are potentially hundreds of cases on which they could the deciding vote that would have to be reassessed.”

Judges appointed by a usurper must be objected to in pre-trial phase. After the verdict or ruling, the De Facto Officer Doctrine kicks in to protect the Federal government from chaos and disruption.

Legislation signed into law by a usurper can be objected to individually if specific adverse action is applied to the individual. For example, the IRS assesses an individual taxpayer a tax for not obtaining and maintaining a healthcare insurance policy. The individual can object to the tax assessment on the basis the law was signed by a usurper and does not apply to them because they object to laws signed by the usurper. The law remains ineffect for everyone else, but the IRS cannot tax the individual who formally objects after an assessment.


37 posted on 05/01/2013 8:56:48 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Oh, I think he was groomed FAR longer than 6 years...


38 posted on 05/01/2013 9:02:59 AM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Go to guidestar.org and sign up. Read the Judicial Watch IRS filings for a few years and you will figure out what the deal is with them.

The amazing thing is that they have always been a “NONPROFIT” which to me is a joke. I expect that Klayman’s latest outfit, Freedom Watch, is no different than JW. Lots of noise, lots of fundraising, lots of nothing...


39 posted on 05/01/2013 9:06:42 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

“””“This kind of lost me when I saw the name Larry Klayman”
Yeah, Judicial Watch and Klayman are like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.

We see the football, we know it exists, we go after the football and just before we get to kick this SOB out of OUR house, some black robed communist mole pulls the football away.””””

Yup, times a million.


40 posted on 05/01/2013 9:07:02 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson