Skip to comments.
Other wife found on Facebook: 'Friends' on Facebook reveal bigamous relationship
Examiner.com ^
| April 16, 2013
| Jay Petrillo
Posted on 04/16/2013 7:51:35 AM PDT by Altariel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
04/16/2013 7:51:35 AM PDT
by
Altariel
To: Altariel
2
posted on
04/16/2013 7:54:11 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .......)
To: Altariel; All
Under the liberal game plan, this is all “A-OK”...as long as the consenting adults “love each other.”
3
posted on
04/16/2013 7:54:54 AM PDT
by
Colofornian
(Jude 3: "...I felt compelled to write and urge you to CONTEND for the faith that was once for all")
To: Altariel
Solution: He must declare that he is a Muslim.
Obamadork’s buttboy Holder will then look the other way - as they always do with the muzzies.
4
posted on
04/16/2013 7:55:54 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: Altariel
The 19th-century sailors who had a wife in every port never had to face this issue.
To: Altariel
Facebook’s facial recognition at work again.
6
posted on
04/16/2013 7:57:24 AM PDT
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Colofornian
Exactly, who are we to judge. /s
7
posted on
04/16/2013 7:58:14 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Altariel
Marriage should be redefined — One wife is too restrictive for many men. Some men just have more love to give to more than just ONE woman. What on earth do people have against one man loving two women (do I need to add that that is all sarcasm)
8
posted on
04/16/2013 7:58:48 AM PDT
by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: Altariel
from her eight years later, then changed his name and remarried another womanIt seems that he failed to follow through on the divorce papaers. It doesn't appear that he was trying to live with both of them at the same time.
9
posted on
04/16/2013 7:58:49 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Altariel
LOL. If you are seeing two women — or are married to two women — its probably a good idea to not have them both as Facebook friends, especially if you have pictures of yourself with each of them at your weddings.
10
posted on
04/16/2013 7:58:59 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Altariel
Divorce attorneys are saddened.
11
posted on
04/16/2013 7:59:26 AM PDT
by
sodpoodle
(Life is prickly - carry tweezers.)
To: proxy_user
I’m sure some of them did. All it would take is one slip up to call a wife by her wrong name, or some other equally basic mistake to raise her suspicions.***
Granted, said wife had fewer legal protections in that period of history (protections varying in accordance with where the wife was living), but some men undoubtedly were caught.
***Though a crafty sailor might avoid that problem by only “marrying” women with the same first name.
12
posted on
04/16/2013 8:00:26 AM PDT
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: areukiddingme1
How sexist of you, what about the woman that wants more than one husband?
13
posted on
04/16/2013 8:00:50 AM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Altariel; GeronL
While at a wedding once I asked the preacher “Why did preachers used to say ‘if there is anyone here who knows any reason why this man and woman should not be married speak now or forever hold his peace’” I was told it was for reasons of multiple wives. The preacher said it is not used anymore because that can be found out with out asking.
Well...Reverend...maybe you better ask as in the old days.
14
posted on
04/16/2013 8:01:01 AM PDT
by
Morgana
(Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
To: from occupied ga
And now he is reaping the consequences of that decision.
15
posted on
04/16/2013 8:01:17 AM PDT
by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: Altariel
Honestly now, who would want more than one wife???
16
posted on
04/16/2013 8:01:25 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: dfwgator
Exactly, who are we to judge. /sAnd, all those corporations who have "ponied up" to support homosexual "marriage" had better be prepared to start paying for multiple-partner benefits...I mean who are they to deny such "partnerships?" /s
17
posted on
04/16/2013 8:02:52 AM PDT
by
Colofornian
(Jude 3: "...I felt compelled to write and urge you to CONTEND for the faith that was once for all")
To: Mastador1
“How sexist of you, what about the woman that wants more than one husband?”
Oh of course “...goose...gander...” absolutely.
18
posted on
04/16/2013 8:04:52 AM PDT
by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: areukiddingme1
“Marriage should be redefined”
Trust me, that is happening as we speak...........and not for the better.
19
posted on
04/16/2013 8:05:08 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: Altariel
Who does this guy think he is - Obama’s father?
20
posted on
04/16/2013 8:06:46 AM PDT
by
LADY J
(You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson