Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strange 'Methuselah' Star Looks Older Than the Universe
Space ^ | 3-7-2013 | Mike Wall

Posted on 03/08/2013 5:17:11 AM PST by Sir Napsalot

The oldest known star appears to be older than the universe itself, but a new study is helping to clear up this seeming paradox.

Previous research had estimated that the Milky Way galaxy's so-called "Methuselah star" is up to 16 billion years old. That's a problem, since most researchers agree that the Big Bang that created the universe occurred about 13.8 billion years ago.

The uncertainty Bond refers to is plus or minus 800 million years, which means the star could actually be 13.7 billion years old — younger than the universe as it's currently understood, though just barely. Now a team of astronomers has derived a new, less nonsensical age for the Methuselah star, incorporating information about its distance, brightness, composition and structure.

"Put all of those ingredients together, and you get an age of 14.5 billion years, with a residual uncertainty that makes the star's age compatible with the age of the universe," study lead author Howard Bond, of Pennsylvania State University and the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, said in a statement.

The uncertainty Bond refers to is plus or minus 800 million years, which means the star could actually be 13.7 billion years old — younger than the universe as it's currently understood, though just barely.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: bigbang; methuselahstar; oldeststar; space; time
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2013 5:17:11 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

you can always fudge the figures when your side has a problem....


2 posted on 03/08/2013 5:27:15 AM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
I thought the title had something to do with this.

3 posted on 03/08/2013 5:32:24 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Reminds me of a college paper I saw back in 1970. It effectively proved black is white.


4 posted on 03/08/2013 5:32:28 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; Hardraade

Oh, for the love of G-d! These people drive me nuts.
9


5 posted on 03/08/2013 5:33:05 AM PST by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

6 posted on 03/08/2013 5:42:29 AM PST by JRios1968 (I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

” ‘Put all of those ingredients together, and you get an age of 14.5 billion years, with a residual uncertainty’ . . . plus or minus 800 million years, which means the star could actually be 13.7 billion years old”

Later in the article:

“The Methuselah star, which is just now bloating into a red giant, was probably born in a dwarf galaxy that the nascent Milky Way gobbled up more than 12 billion years ago, researchers said. The star’s long, looping orbit is likely a residue of that dramatic act of cannibalism.”

— leaving the impression that something 13 to 14 billion years old was created roughly 12 billion years ago. Only on close reading will a layman come to the conclusion that the star somehow survived its galaxy being gobbled up (rather than being creatd as a result of that event), and had its orbit affected as a result.

The article also says “The star moves at about 800,000 mph (1.3 million km/h)” but doesn’t say relative to what.


7 posted on 03/08/2013 5:45:09 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad N. Freud

The Milky Way and Andromeda are going to collide and during that collision, not much is going to touch one and other. Space is vast.


8 posted on 03/08/2013 5:52:08 AM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chad N. Freud
Thanks, but the article leaves no doubt that the star is ‘one of the oldest’ from the earliest galaxies.
9 posted on 03/08/2013 5:52:54 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

They’re gonna call the star “Helen Thomas”


10 posted on 03/08/2013 5:53:19 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

HT really doesn’t deserve the honor, having the star named after her.


11 posted on 03/08/2013 5:58:06 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chad N. Freud

When a galaxy is “eaten up” by another galaxy, that means that the two merge, and more or less assume the identity of the larger galaxy. Few, if any, of the stars fall into the larger galaxy’s central black hole, or anything like that. Sort of like mitosis going backward in time.

The 800,000 mph seems to refer to the “proper motion” (as opposed to parallax) of the star, which would be motion with respect to our little solar system. You are correct, it is not at all clear.


12 posted on 03/08/2013 5:59:55 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (What word begins with "O" and ends in economic collapse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

13 posted on 03/08/2013 6:02:29 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Oh, for the love of G-d! These people drive me nuts.

Who? Scientists?

Fine.

Don't use anything developed by scientists, or anything developed by engineers based on the work of scientists.

Enjoy your solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short life, caveman.

What?

You don't want to live like a caveman?

Then quit bitching about the people who enable you (and the whole society you live in) to live better than cavemen.

14 posted on 03/08/2013 6:04:00 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
The Milky Way and Andromeda are going to collide and during that collision, not much is going to touch one and other. Space is vast.

Like an atom, takes up space, but most of the space is made up of nothing.
15 posted on 03/08/2013 6:06:24 AM PST by ZX12R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

What was there before the so-called Big Bang????


16 posted on 03/08/2013 6:10:48 AM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boonie
-- What was there before the so-called Big Bang? --

From a physical standpoint, nothing. Not even space or time. Asking what was "before" implies time was running "before," but not even time was running. It couldn't.

17 posted on 03/08/2013 6:16:23 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

16 billion plus or minus 800 million is 16.8 or 15.2 billion, still older than the universe


18 posted on 03/08/2013 6:17:16 AM PST by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

You forgot the BARF Alert on that picture.


19 posted on 03/08/2013 6:19:29 AM PST by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Wow. If those sizes are accurate, HD140283 is beyond huge.

Betelgeuse is almost a million times the size of our sun.

20 posted on 03/08/2013 6:21:34 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Here once the embattled farmers stood... And fired the shot heard round the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson