Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freep a Poll! (Fox. Should Congress approve comprehensive immigration reform?)
foxnews.com ^ | 1-28-13 | Fox News

Posted on 01/28/2013 4:06:10 PM PST by dynachrome

Should Congress approve comprehensive immigration reform?

No -- there's no need for it, and Congress won't get it done anyway

Yes, with an emphasis on the pathway to legal status for illegal immigrants who are here

Congress should address this through a series of bills, as opposed to one massive package

Yes, but any deal must secure the border

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: foxnews; illegals; immigration; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: dynachrome

Got this response from my libtard senator when I registered my aggravation that we are having this debate, yet again...

“Thank you for getting in touch with me about immigration reform. I agree that our immigration system is broken.

It is time we undertake comprehensive immigration reform that secures our borders, maximizes American economic prosperity, provides a path to citizenship with fair and rigorous requirements, and imposes tough sanctions on employers who break the law.

I support efforts to curb illegal immigration such as increasing criminal penalties for immigrant smuggling and document fraud and eliminating or modifying the use of government documents that are easily forged. Better enforcement and tougher penalties for employers who employ undocumented immigrants are among the important steps we must take to fight unlawful employment opportunities — the major driving force behind illegal immigration.

While I do not support amnesty, I believe our nation should consider establishing a process by which undocumented immigrants can eventually earn citizenship. We should provide children — who were brought to this country through no fault of their own — the opportunity to contribute to their local communities and our nation.

The solution to our immigration problem will not be a simple one, but it is time to take a common sense approach to immigration reform.

Thank you again for being in touch with me.”


21 posted on 01/28/2013 5:14:25 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Still seeking change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly !!

I knew that gun ban was set up as a media diversion to ram thru Amnesty while our attention was focused elsewhere !

That vile Grahamnesty is reelection in 2014!

He needs to be removed this time !
This crowd needs to pay a price for selling us out to there K st lobbyists in
. Big Ag and massive grocery chain stores !


22 posted on 01/28/2013 5:20:32 PM PST by ncalburt (Amnesty media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly !!

I knew that gun ban was set up as a media diversion to ram thru Amnesty while our attention was focused elsewhere !

That vile Grahamnesty is up for reelection
in 2014!

He needs to be removed this time !

This crowd needs to pay a price for selling us out to there K st lobbyists in
. Big Ag and massive grocery chain stores !


23 posted on 01/28/2013 5:21:12 PM PST by ncalburt (Amnesty media out in full force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
•Deport illegal aliens on contact with LE.
•Enforce the law vigorously on employers of illegals.
•Strong border security. Build the physical fence and use high-tech surveillance.
•Eliminate entitlements for illegal aliens except for true emergency care.
•End the "anchor baby" policy.


TRUST ME, not even having seen the plan, NONE of these items will be included - or should I say will be SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED.
24 posted on 01/28/2013 5:36:50 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

No doubt about it.


25 posted on 01/28/2013 5:44:39 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone

“What we need is a third America First Party...”

I agree friend, when do we get started?


26 posted on 01/28/2013 6:19:25 PM PST by River Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

FReeEEeePED:

NOPE!

We know how “amnesty” turned out last time!! There will be NO deal to “secure” the border — whatever that means.

Yes, with an emphasis on the pathway to legal status for illegal immigrants who are here 8.31%

Yes, but any deal must secure the border 45.83%

Congress should address this through a series of bills, as opposed to one massive package 18.66%

No — there’s no need for it, and Congress won’t get it done anyway 27.2%


27 posted on 01/28/2013 6:52:25 PM PST by Bon of Babble (Instant Human....Add Coffee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
SE Cupp is co-author of Why You're Wrong About the Right, a book that holds that those on the right don't have to believe in anything conservative.
28 posted on 01/28/2013 6:56:13 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

There is a step one, which makes illegals, legal, there would be no need to bother with the other steps, no one is going to make them obey the rules or ask them to leave. They would have legal status and that is all they would desire.


29 posted on 01/28/2013 11:18:49 PM PST by itsahoot (MSM and Fox free since Nov 1st. If it doesnÂ’t happen here then it didn't happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
According to Rubio's plan they would have to apply for it to get that legal status. Under it they wouldn't be eligible for any Federal benefits so I don't think they would get all they desire there. He also said that the whole thing hinges on strong border security and enforcement too.

But don't get excited, I'm not buying into it. First, who will enforce the security and enforcement? Second, it will still spur a flood of new illegals who think they can get in on it regardless if they can or not. Thirdly, how will they know who was here the day the law was signed and who came after that? Fourthly, Rubio's plan sounds very reasonable and he sounds sincere but I know and you know it's only a sales pitch and by the time the House and Senate get through bouncing it back and forth it won't have one tenth of what he's talking about left in it. And it will have a load of crap that's outrageous no doubt including a few billion in pork for things that are totally unrelated to borders, illegals or immigration.

30 posted on 01/28/2013 11:40:46 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson