Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Jeeves
Bonds and Clemens should get 100% of the first-ballot vote from any objective observers.

Does objective mean any observer who agrees with you? I wouldn't vote for either Bonds or Clemens. Integrity is part of the process for admission into the hall of fame, and both of them took steroids and cheated. They wouldn't get my vote.

steroids were a fact of the game a decade ago

Yes, but not everyone took steroids. The players that took steroids cheated the other players. That's not fair, and it's not an excuse to say that a bunch of players were doing it. Doesn't matter.

Both had Hall-of-Fame career numbers before steroid use ever became part of the game.

I'm not so sure about that. There's never been a hint that Fred McGriff was on steroids, and he's not a HOFer (didn't even get close this year). So he's a pretty good baseline comparison. Let's assume that Bonds started taking steroids in 2000, the year in which his homers increased by 15 to a then career high 49 (the next year, he hit 73). So we're comparing McGriff to Bonds's career, 1986 through 2000.

Home Runs:

McGriff - 493

Bonds - 445

Batting Avg.

McGriff - .284 (including some crappy years at the end)

Bonds - .289

Slugging

McGriff - .509

Bonds - .567

RBIs

McGriff - 1550

Bonds - 1405

Doubles

McGriff - 441

Bonds - 451

Total Bases

McGriff - 4458

Bonds - 4228

Pretty similar. And McGriff got 20% of the vote this year. Where Bonds tends to dominate McGriff is on walks. But even in looking at singular dominant seasons, the two are pretty similar:

Prior to 2000, Bonds lead the league in home runs once (1993). McGriff did it twice (89, 92). Neither Bonds (pre-2000) or McGriff won the batting title. Bonds led the league in total bases once (1993), McGriff never got higher than third.

It's hard to say that pre-roid Bonds is a lock HOFer, especially given that McGriff is basically not even in the conversation. I will say that I think McGriff should be in the HOF, but McGriff is exactly the type of player that the steroid era has cheated. 493 home runs should have been a lock before steroids, but 500 home runs is considered a pretty pedestrian number these days, thanks to cheaters like Bonds, ARod, and Sammy Sosa.

49 posted on 01/09/2013 12:32:31 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

I think McGriff (but not Bonds) belongs in the HOF. I can’t believe that he doesn’t at least get 50 to 60% of the votes.


51 posted on 01/09/2013 12:37:30 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Valerius
Yes, but not everyone took steroids

How do you know that since the roid-rangers only went after the big hitters with the big figures?

You actually think that with the rampant availability of so-called steroids that only the top players were using them??????

Give me a F'n break..........


73 posted on 01/09/2013 2:57:44 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Jab her with a harpoon or just throw her from the train......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson