Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Since Petraeus was not required to testify under oath, does that mean Hillary won't either?
vanity | November 16, 2012 | slef

Posted on 11/16/2012 12:46:18 PM PST by BenLurkin

Washington (CNN) -- Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified on Capitol Hill on Friday that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was an act of terrorism committed by al Qaeda-linked militants.

U.S. Rep. Peter King of New York, who spoke to reporters after the closed hearing, which lasted an hour and 20 minutes.

The account Petraeus gave was different from the description the Obama administration gave on September 14, King said.

Then, the attack was described as "spontaneous," the result of a protest against an anti-Muslim film that got out of control outside the compound.

Petraeus was not under oath, King said.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/16/politics/benghazi-hearings/index.html


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazihearings; libya; soshillary; vanity

1 posted on 11/16/2012 12:46:22 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Under oath.

pshaw!

Like that means anything to Democrats. Especially a Clinton.


2 posted on 11/16/2012 12:47:46 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Doesn’t matter. She won’t remember anyway. Her answers will all be along the lines of, “I don’t recall...My mind is jello.”


3 posted on 11/16/2012 12:48:57 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Here’s your sign!


4 posted on 11/16/2012 12:50:25 PM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st

Gee..thanks...


5 posted on 11/16/2012 12:51:29 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When will they roll out Larry Flynt the Hustler publisher
(that honors women), to start threatening anyone who asks questions?


6 posted on 11/16/2012 12:53:04 PM PST by DOGHEAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I wear mine since the election.


7 posted on 11/16/2012 12:55:35 PM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
hillary ducks and petraeus covers. Yeah. That's the ticket.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

8 posted on 11/16/2012 1:04:51 PM PST by MestaMachine (TREASON!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Oath means nothing to hillary. Remember “I’m sorry, I don’t recall”
$itch.


9 posted on 11/16/2012 1:05:46 PM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When Hilly testifies, it is always the same: “ I DON’T RECALL - - - - .”


10 posted on 11/16/2012 1:12:29 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Can anyone help me out with this. If they have subpoena power, why don’t they at least bother to make the testimony they gather as truthful as possible by putting it under oath?


11 posted on 11/16/2012 1:12:55 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Like we should believe anything any of these people say?


12 posted on 11/16/2012 1:16:51 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Petraeus was not under oath, King said.

He wasn't under oath on Sept 14 either when he lied through his broadwell kissing lips. So then can we expect another amended evolving statement.

13 posted on 11/16/2012 1:19:40 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Since it’s a felony to lie to Congress, I think all testimony to Congress is consider “under oath.”


14 posted on 11/16/2012 1:25:32 PM PST by RoosterRedux (Bill Clinton just signed Paula Broadwell to write his bio...and Jill Kelley as his social liaison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Since it’s a felony to lie to Congress,

But Congress can lie to us all they want.

15 posted on 11/16/2012 1:31:08 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If Hillary is forced to go under oath, the only thing we will get is, “I don’t recall.”


16 posted on 11/16/2012 3:08:48 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson