To: ziravan
This is a good point.
I was mystified in the primaries that Ron Paul was somehow an “unacceptable” candidate while Mitt Romney was OK?!?!
I guess electability counts for something.
Except Mitt couldn’t get elected. Oops.
37 posted on
11/14/2012 9:01:27 AM PST by
delapaz
To: delapaz
I guess electability counts for something.Whenever you hear any representative of the GOP-e fart or wheeze the word "electability"... what they really mean is: "Someone acceptable to Rachel Maddow."
38 posted on
11/14/2012 9:04:15 AM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: delapaz
Obama won because he made a concerted effort to appeal to every portion of his base.
We tell our base to go to hell and then scratch our heads at the result.
43 posted on
11/14/2012 10:54:08 AM PST by
ziravan
(Are you better off now than you were $9.4 Trillion dollars ago?)
To: delapaz
....
Except Mitt couldn’t get elected. Oops.
50 posted on
11/14/2012 11:49:13 AM PST by
Ron H.
(Democrats and Republicans - birds of a feather that are now flocking together.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson