Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benghazi II: New and Improved, with Sex !!
nov 11, 2012 | self

Posted on 11/11/2012 6:39:55 AM PST by beebuster2000

To become truly great, scandals need to catch fire. They need to grow as fuel is added daily or weekly, leaks, new info. Post election, Benghazi was a fading campfire. Now, the Petraeus sex scandal has ignited it to a level that even the NYT can't ignore.

How long has the administration known? Did Petraeus beat the lie detector on his vetting as CIA Director? Or has the administration known all along? Who authorized the FBI investigation, and how come, since there is apparantley no crime alleged? And, her is the nut of it, what was Petraeus told to say about Benghazi? and who told him? Did he or his people knowingly provide false briefing to the dupe US UN Ambassador? And if not Petraeus, who?

But be assured of one thing, dear fellow freeper, the bonfire has started, and it wont be going away soon. Stay tuned.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: benghazi; broadwell; davidpetraeus; kenyanbornmuzzie; navyseals; paulabroadwell; petraeusaffair; threatmatrix; threatmatrixbenghazi; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Mouton

Broadwell Galore u thinking?

“All In” on Your Majestys Service?


21 posted on 11/11/2012 7:48:07 AM PST by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

The odds are that they appointed him as head of the CIA AFTER they learned of his affair. It is possible they did that BECAUSE of the affair. But what is certain is that the Chicago Machine began to drudge up info on him after rumors began that Petraeus would be Mitt’s nominee —Hussein’s early political career in Illinois was permitted specifically by those same tactics. Hey he talks a lot about, “change” but I assure you that is not little gem that Hussein would absolutely not change —CUZ IT WORKS.

So remember the order:

1. rumors the Repubican VP would be Petraeus
2. search for dirt
3. discovery of dirt
4. VP nomination of Ryan, not Petraeus (mean this high-value card was put into storage)
5. Appointment of the compromised Petraeus to head of CIA
6. Bengazi melt-down “nasty YouTube vid did it, and dumb CIA didn’t do it’s job so they’re to blame”
7. Confrontation of comromised Petraeus with damning info
8. Proud Petraeus refuses to let his Agency take all the blame, goes off the prepared narrative
9. Petraeus outs his own indiscretions


22 posted on 11/11/2012 8:00:15 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Miss Good Broad maybe too!


23 posted on 11/11/2012 8:05:11 AM PST by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

The gunrunning may have started under Panetta.


24 posted on 11/11/2012 8:08:47 AM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I love the way folks on our side said for years that this guy was in over his head. With this and all the other points being listed above it appears we underestimated this thug president. He has been running a Tony Soprano regime the entire time. This incident is just one more example. This won’t amount to a hill of beans. The press will protect their piece of crap Prez.


25 posted on 11/11/2012 8:15:19 AM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Did Israel Honey Trap David Petraeus?

November 9th, 2012 | Author: Patriot

With the breaking news on General Petraeus (http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/cia-chief-petraeus-resigns-reportedly-over-affair-201305343–politics.html) you might be interested in taking a look at the Mondoweiss.net link (at the following New Statesman article) which broke the story about email exchanges with David Petraeus which US mainstream media ignored as well (as also mentioned on Press TV via http://tinyurl.com/proisraelbiasedmedia & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEtASJOjDU8).


26 posted on 11/11/2012 8:24:17 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Tagline space for rent to pay for some of my extra taxes the next 4 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Or ... what is the upcoming revelation that Petraeus is the diversion for?


27 posted on 11/11/2012 8:29:58 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (If you could read my mind ... just count up the felonies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Maybe now, it will get people’s attention? (I’m being facetious)


28 posted on 11/11/2012 8:36:45 AM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Ya think?


29 posted on 11/11/2012 8:38:24 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Yeah, but he had to realize who he married. This is a woman who must be the center of attention wherever she goes. He’s another guy who thought he could change a woman after he married her only to find out that he couldn’t. I really feel sorry for the kids.


30 posted on 11/11/2012 8:42:17 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

How much you want to bet that this woman was a Daddy’s girl or else had an absent Dad?


31 posted on 11/11/2012 8:44:16 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gaijin; beebuster2000
9. Petraeus outs his own indiscretions

Petraeus as Hank Rearden?

32 posted on 11/11/2012 8:46:28 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Snow ball effect in motion.


33 posted on 11/11/2012 8:57:13 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

The affair only became a matter of national security AFTER Benghazi. The admin is far more concerned with what Petraeus has confided to Broadwell about Benghazi. Who knows, he may have given her documents and information for safe keeping.


34 posted on 11/11/2012 9:06:53 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

If this isn’t the “Chicago way”....

I know we are all feeling pretty down in the dumps about the election....but, take heart, fellow Conservatives....if the slimeballs in Chi are going this route?

THEY ARE IN TROUBLE.

Drip, drip, drip. The new media is doing an end run around the MSM.


35 posted on 11/11/2012 9:28:06 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I was a “liberal” until mugged by reality 9/11/01.

My husband explained a few things to me...it took me a few weeks to understand. It's taken me 10 years to really “get” Conservatism. So...take heart...people “get it” a lot of times.

Why I think Benghazi is different? Well, my hat is off to my very smart husband, again. He always tell me that when something is egregious it usually doesn't go away. If Obama purposefully gave a stand down order to not protect an Ambassador? That's egregious.

My husband is usually right. I'm counting on this to expose Barry and the MSM.

36 posted on 11/11/2012 9:33:29 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“For as long as I can remember, people on this site have been saying:
The dinosaur media is dead. New media now calls the shots!
The MSM has been covering stuff up, but they can’t away with that anymore!
Their business model has failed — now they have no choice but to tell the truth!
All they need to do is keep quiet until after the election, then they will tell us what we already know.”

This is one of the most disturbing things to me, one of the biggest lessons from what just happened. They are NOT dead, their influence is still mighty over most of the populace. Those of us who read and understand more were lulled into a false sense of security by our belief the media’s influence was waning. But put it all together - from the very beginning, with the absurd attacks on Romney’s supposed “gaffes” (which were nothing more than his telling the truth) - then with the first debate, the general public finally got to see the real Obama. So the media sent in Candy Crowley to fix that. Add to that the constant cheerleading, from all sides, all the cutesy “human interest” stories about the Obamas - perhaps the worst was the internet. Every time you open your homepage or your webmail, there they are grinning at you, all cute and everything- Ohio Votes Early!!!” just as if this weren’t an election, but nothing more than Academy Awards night or the final game of the World Series. And if you never hear another side, that stuff adds up and has a powerful influence.

So I agree - give up the narrative that the dinosaur media is dead - it isn’t - but actively work to kill it.


37 posted on 11/11/2012 9:41:42 AM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pigsley

We are all hoping that the truth comes out,but I expect little from the House, and I am usually not dissappointed. Little is what we get.


38 posted on 11/11/2012 9:50:44 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Do you not also think that most congresscritters have skeletons in their closets and are certainly vulnerable to blackmail? How else to explain their erratic behavior?


39 posted on 11/11/2012 10:00:46 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Of course they knew all along. They saved it until the admin needed to shut him up.

Now he’s shamed, discredited and not believable. It’s a warning to anyone else who might blow the whistle on what’s REALLY going on behind the scenes in this Administration.


40 posted on 11/11/2012 10:07:29 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson