BARACK OBAMA FRAUD 2012- (MUST READ- MUST GO VIRAL!)

Barack Obama Voter Fraud 2012 ^ | Nov 9, 2012 | ObamaVoterFraud

[UnwashedPeasant]

"There will be the next election in 2016, but we will lose it."

They have elections in Cuba too. Lots of candidates, and the "correct" candidate always wins.

[UnwashedPeasant]

"Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law"

That says it all.

A presidential election won by fraud is a coup d'etat. Even in banana republics, the people do not all just ignore it and accept the outcome.

[dforest]

Yeah, those elections are so they can claim it is still a democracy. But the outcome is always the same. No LOL, just LOBS

[wintertime]

Do you, or anyone, know if after the election is called, does the losing candidate keep his protection, and if so for how long?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Good question. I don’t know.

[Wingy]

Bookmark

[Amendment10]

Thank you for starting this thread. Given the voting irregularities pointed out by the info that you have provided, the most surprising aspect of the election for me is the following. Unlike Bush43 and Gore who fought tooth-and-nail to win the Florida vote recount in 2000, wimp Romney conceded the race as if he was following a Democratic script imo. After all, GOP's nomination of McCain for president years back never made sense to me; the GOP arguably wanted to lose the presidential race by nominating McCain. So was Romney essentially a "new and improved" McCain who was likewise arguably nominated to lose the race.

As a side note concerning my "support" of Romney, consider that the only reason that I supported him is because the GOP nominated him over the objections of many patriots, my support for Romney ultimately nothing more than an ABO attitute. So I'm not really trying to defend Romney with this post.

The frosting on the cake for me is when Fox's O'Reilly announced that there were no problems with voting. I don't like O'Reilly, or any Fox News commentators for that matter, because they suspiciously never include Congress's Section 8-liimited powers in federal public policy discussions.

Again, given possible voter fraud, why did wimp Romney concede the race to Obama without a fight?

[Yaelle]

This could be why Obama didnt “show up” for debate 1. He knew he would be handed the reelection. Then he got such bad press that they had to quick prep him for the next two.

This guy has never had to work for anything in his life.

[BruCru]

ping

[copaliscrossing]

I have no idea about the accuracy of Mr Curtis' testimony. I am certainly not accusing him of lying.

I guess what I meant by "spot on" was in a technical sense. There was nothing he said that was not true in a technical sense. I really don't think what he is talking about is all that hard to pull off and with the stakes this high and a propensity for lack of morals, there is motive for the democRATs to do it also.

I agree it even looks like a dog and pony show with the questioners not having clue one what they were talking about or how to properly frame the questions. But that doesn't negate the technical accuracy of his testimony. I know there are several postings that are taking this video further than I am. I am only interested in the technical part of the testimony.

What I will also say is that I have no idea what safeguards are in place to "checksum" the object code against the verified source code or manual checks to ensure proper counting. Perhaps those are in place and that's why both parties are OK with these results in an accuracy sense.

[little jeremiah]

I”ve posted this on another forum. I’m trying now to find a FR thread about a petition about the stolen election to re-post and can’t find it. If you know of any election fraud articles or the petition, ping me, okay?

[little jeremiah]

Pinging a few who I know are interested in the fraud topic to this thread; my idea is that there is so much info coming to light that if anyone who is so inclined posts a link to relevant articles, a summary, or personal knowledge on one ongoing thread it will make catching up and staying informed easier.

Just a thought, will try to help out as time permits.

One thought:

By stealing the election, the leftist bastards did at least three things:

1. Got their bastard staying in the WH.

2. Demoralized Republicans and conservatives (who aren’t paying attention or are hiding their eyes) by making them think that SO MANY Americans just LUV leftist crap and not so many are conservative. But with a stolen election, WHO KNOWS???

3. Further demoralizing Rs and conservatives by BLATANTLY engaging in massive criminal fraud - in our faces - and when cowards submit to thugs, this takes away whatever little courage and principles they still have. It is a way of fettering the opposition. It is a tactic to take away the oppostion’s fighting spirit (which Rs have little enough of any way).

[presently no screen name]

IF there is a Voter Fraud ping list - please ADD me.

Thanks.

[presently no screen name]

Suppression of news - socialism/communism! And WE pay for the public library!

[Yaelle]

If all of this is true, what could ever be done about it, and how can we stop it from happening again?

We are the 90 lb weakling and they are the toilet swirling bully who never gets in trouble.

[presently no screen name]

They overcompensated so much the fraud is impossible to hide.

This is what tipped me off to voter fraud Tues night - they OVER PLAYED their hand.

WHY, because they knew Romney had it big time! Romney's crowds, his smack debate of barry, with reading about many voted for obama in '08 (blacks included) were not voting for him now. They knew they were sunk. They knew they needed a lot to overcome that.

[MHGinTN]

"... how can we stop it from happening again?"

Well, it would be a mistake to believe the Republicants actually want to fix the broken election system. BUT, if they actually wanted to, here's what will be needed, at minimum:

1. All voters must be registered int he district where they will vote;
Every voter must choose one of three affiliation designations: D, R, or I;
To vote, every voter must show a picture ID and have their name marked on a voter roll book;
Very severee penalties must be enacted for vote cheating, including lengthy prison terms all the way to execution for treason (and it is treason to cancel the vote of the sovereign); The election is not declared over until one month after the day of voting, and ANY anomolies must be adjudicated prior to any state declaring who won each office; No electronic machines will be used at any stage in the counting or registering votes, all votes will be cast on a paper ballot and retained for ten years fromt he date of the vote, then be moved to ficrofich for 100 year retention of the data.

This will not be done, any of it, because neither party is ready to recognize We The People as the actual Sovereigns of the now dead Republic. We are merely biding time until America is a UN (or some variation on the globalists' scheme) protectorate.

[presently no screen name]

To: patriot08

Sorry, but it’s over.

9 posted on Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:52:56 PM by duckman (I'm part of the group pulling the wagon!)

Full of fraudulent votes?

[little jeremiah]

Even if you take into fraud I doubt Romney won. Obama had too large a margin of victory. So the rationale for protesting the results and validating them for accuracy is NOT to elect Mitt Romney. The rationale is simply to get to the truth and ensure elections are fair. I wouldn’t care if Obama won by 10M. We should never accept voter fraud

---

THere is no way of knowing any margins. Fraud was rampant in many, many states. It’s unknown what the total of fake votes/stolen votes/lost votes/changed votes/hacked votes is.

[little jeremiah]

Ahem - patriot08, please pick up the white courtesy phone! I think a ping list is being requested.

:-)

[plain talk]

Precisely. But our rationale to validate results is not just based on an agenda to turn around election results we don’t like. There is a lot of smoke here. We want it examined so the truth prevails. Let the chips fall where they may.