Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM creates new method to pack nanotubes on chip
ZDnet ^ | 10/29/2012 | David Meyer

Posted on 10/29/2012 7:09:27 AM PDT by HenryArmitage

IBM's researchers have made another breakthrough in their development of carbon nanotube technology, packing more than 10,000 working transistors made of the substance onto a single chip.

It is now a decade since IBM first announced a process for fabricating carbon nanotubes in a way that could make them usable for processors. Although silicon has allowed the industry to keep making transistors smaller and smaller, it does not work properly at the nanoscale. Another substance will have to take over for the really tiny processors of the future.

Such processors will be needed to make computing devices and sensors smaller and more energy-efficient.

Ultimately, more than a billion transistors based on carbon nanotubes will need to fit onto one chip, if the substance is to prove its worth. However, IBM's latest breakthrough marks a significant step — previously, no-one had got more than a few hundred of the transistors onto one chip at a time.

"Carbon nanotubes, borne out of chemistry, have largely been laboratory curiosities as far as microelectronic applications are concerned. We are attempting the first steps towards a technology by fabricating carbon nanotube transistors within a conventional wafer fabrication infrastructure," IBM Research physical sciences chief Supratik Guha said in a statement on Sunday.

"The motivation to work on carbon nanotube transistors is that at extremely small nanoscale dimensions, they outperform transistors made from any other material. However, there are challenges to address such as ultra-high purity of the carbon nanotubes and deliberate placement at the nanoscale. We have been making significant strides in both."

IBM's last big breakthrough in the field of carbon nanotubes came just under a year ago, when the firm said it had managed to make a well-performing carbon nanotube transistor with sub-10nm channel lengths — this is the sort of scale where silicon is no longer viable.

Carbon nanotubes are, as their name suggests, atom-thick sheets of carbon rolled into tubes. Graphene, another nanoscale carbon substance, is also in the running for taking over from silicon, as is the graphene-like two-dimensional form of molybdenum disulphide.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: ibm; nanotubes; processors
neat.
1 posted on 10/29/2012 7:09:28 AM PDT by HenryArmitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

Totally more tubular than a pool noodle.

I got a pix below the main article showing a bible and a gun and bullets (ok, cartridges) on a US flag. Question: is it proper for these items to be sitting on the flag or ought they to be next to it?


2 posted on 10/29/2012 7:21:11 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Wow - a scientific breakthrough funded by a private enterprise without government subsidy. Investment in research by a corporation hoping to reap the rewards of their risk by creating new, marketable products, thereby creating wealth and good jobs, without government assistance and taxpayer burden. What a concept!


3 posted on 10/29/2012 7:50:08 AM PDT by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: theKid51

ping


4 posted on 10/29/2012 7:56:31 AM PDT by bmwcyle (45% to 47% of American voters are stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: privatedrive

You didn’t build that!


5 posted on 10/29/2012 8:34:41 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck; Jim Robinson

Y’know, I’ve ALWAYS been bothered by that particular graphic, too. It seems rather casually disrespectful to Ol’ Glory to use it as a ‘MERE’ backdrop as it is here.

Of course, I ALSO despise shirts, bandanas, umbrellas, and so forth made out of the flag or made to ‘appear’ to be made out of the flag.

A patch I can deal with, but the flag itself should NOT — EVER !!! — be used / presented in this way.

One Man’s Opinion

21stCenturion


6 posted on 10/29/2012 9:56:04 AM PDT by 21stCenturion ("It's the Judges, Stupid !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

so the global warming alarmists ought to love this

as a profitable reason to “scrub” the carbon from CO2 in the atmosphere develops /LOL


7 posted on 10/29/2012 9:57:57 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: privatedrive

you...you...CAPITALIST!!!

8^)


8 posted on 10/29/2012 11:16:45 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson