Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomy Picture of the Day -- The Hubble Extreme Deep Field
NASA ^ | October 14, 2012 | (see photo credit)

Posted on 10/14/2012 3:04:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

Explanation: What did the first galaxies look like? To help answer this question, the Hubble Space Telescope has just finished taking the eXtreme Deep Field (XDF), the deepest image of the universe ever taken in visible light. Pictured above, the XDF shows a sampling of some of the oldest galaxies ever seen, galaxies that formed just after the dark ages, 13 billion years ago, when the universe was only a few percent of its present age. The Hubble Space Telescope's ACS camera and the infrared channel of the WFPC3 camera took the image. Combining efforts spread over 10 years, the XDF is more sensitive, in some colors, than the original Hubble Deep Field (HDF), the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) completed in 2004, and the HUDF Infrared completed in 2009. Astronomers the world over will likely study the XDF for years to come to better understand how stars and galaxies formed in the early universe.

October 14, 2012

(Excerpt) Read more at 129.164.179.22 ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: apod; astronomy; hst; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
[Credit: NASA, ESA, G. Illingworth, D. Magee, and P. Oesch (UCSC), R. Bouwens (Leiden Obs.), and the XDF Team]

1 posted on 10/14/2012 3:04:08 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

All of 'em more than 6014 light-years distant.

2 posted on 10/14/2012 3:04:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; married21; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; ...

It looks much, much nicer in larger size.

3 posted on 10/14/2012 3:06:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
All of 'em more than 6014 light-years distant.

Makes me wonder what they look like in the present.

4 posted on 10/14/2012 3:30:12 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

This is true. For perspective, when you look up towards the sun, you’re seeing what it looked like (and where it was) eight minutes prior.


5 posted on 10/14/2012 3:34:16 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Is a most fascinating place which is called the present when in the present one can view only the past.
6 posted on 10/14/2012 4:02:05 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
eXtreme Deep Field 13 billion years ago, when the universe was only a few percent of its present age.

Ah, I remember the good old days!

We didn’t have easy like you kids do.

We had to walk through knee deep quasars up hill to school; both ways!

7 posted on 10/14/2012 4:17:00 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thank You, Civ, for today’s present.


8 posted on 10/14/2012 4:35:05 AM PDT by left that other site (Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Light time between the earth and moon.

Photobucket

The New Horizons spacecraft is currently about 3 hours and 25 light minutes from earth.
9 posted on 10/14/2012 4:47:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

:’)


10 posted on 10/14/2012 5:15:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

My pleasure!


11 posted on 10/14/2012 5:15:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
Makes me wonder what they look like in the present.

Also keep in mind that light from some of these galaxies and photo-galaxies have been red-shifted to significantly longer wavelengths than they started out due to the universe's expansion. What we are seeing now in the 'visible' range may have started out in the UV or even shorter. Galaxies can emit very different images in visible vs UV and other ranges.

12 posted on 10/14/2012 5:39:50 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

From NASA.gov:

“An astronomical object can look very different depending on what wavelength is used in its detection. The object’s appearance often changes across the electromagnetic spectrum because various physical processes result in emission in different wavelength regions. Images of emission can be made by mapping brightness to colors (see “Making an Image”). For example, the optical image of the Andromeda galaxy (below left) shows glowing stars. And dark dust lanes trace out a spiral arm structure. An infrared image of the galaxy (below right) shows several concentric rings of dust rather than spiral arms. The dust is too cold (-260 degree C) to be detected in optical light.

Below are five images of the galaxy M 33. [see link]

Each image is taken in a different wavelength region.

In the X-ray image, we see very hot, diffuse interstellar gas, and bright point-like X-ray sources, such as X-ray binaries.

The brightness in the ultraviolet image indicates star formation activity. Stars are visible in the optical image.

Red supergiant stars and dust heated by massive star formation are highlighted in the near-infrared image, which looks similar to the optical image.

The radio image maps out hydrogen gas in the galaxy. The red coloring is indicative of gas moving away from our line of sight. The blue colors gas moving toward us (a phenomena described by Doppler shift).”

http://mwmw.gsfc.nasa.gov/mmw_across.html


13 posted on 10/14/2012 5:45:32 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Light time between the earth and moon.

Is about 1-1/4 seconds.

14 posted on 10/14/2012 5:47:16 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The New Horizons spacecraft is currently about 3 hours and 25 light minutes from earth.

For those who aren't aware, one light-second is about 186,000 miles.

So that's 186,000 x 60secs x 60mins x ~3.5 (miles). = 2,343,600,000 miles (~2.3 billion miles)

15 posted on 10/14/2012 5:54:42 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ETL

So that’s 186,000 x 60secs x 60mins x ~3.5 (miles)

correction: (hours) not (miles)


16 posted on 10/14/2012 6:04:24 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Ah, I remember the good old days!

We didn’t have easy like you kids do.

We had to walk through knee deep quasars up hill to school; both ways!


Yes, and it was really exciting getting past those black holes. Seeing them was the first challenge.


17 posted on 10/14/2012 6:05:20 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
Ah, I remember the good old days! We didn’t have it easy like you kids do. We had to walk through knee deep quasars up hill to school; both ways!

Lol. I'm a big Monty Python fan too.

Four Yorkshiremen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13JK5kChbRw

18 posted on 10/14/2012 6:16:43 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Same as my Dad, apparently!


19 posted on 10/14/2012 6:21:27 AM PDT by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Thank You.


20 posted on 10/14/2012 6:24:24 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson