Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dropping Atomic Bombs on Japan Was Imperative
Self | August 10, 2012 | Self

Posted on 08/10/2012 11:02:37 AM PDT by Retain Mike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Retain Mike

Great thread. I wonder if you’ve ever come across the Australian journalist Murray Sayle’s writings?

He claimed Japan surrendered because they were more afraid of Stalin than us, and therefore the atomic bombings were unnecessary atrocities.

My own reflexive view is, that since we demanded “unconditional surrender”, Imperial Japan had no guarantee that we would have spared them (and the Emperor) any more than the Soviets would have apared them in the event of surrender. The bombs were important precipitants for their decision.

Sayle lived in Japan for 30 years starting in 1972. He died in 2010.

His claims, according to New Yorker magazine:

“From Japan, Sayle contributed several long pieces to The New Yorker, including the Letter from Hiroshima “Did the Bomb End the War?,” from 1995, which questioned the military necessity of employing the atom bomb against the Japanese and argued that fear of a Soviet invasion—and not the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki—prompted Japan’s surrender”

From a 1995 article he wrote for New Yorker magazine:

“...the bombs promised only to kill more Japanese, whereas the Soviets, possibly allied with local Communists, threatened to destroy the monarchy, which almost all Japanese, and certainly those in the government, viewed as the soul of the nation. A surrender with some guarantee for the Emperor thus became the best of a gloomy range of options, and the quicker the better, because every day that passed meant more gains on the ground for the Soviets, and thus a likely bigger share of the inevitable occupation. Recognition that a surrender today will be more favorable than one tomorrow is the classic reason that wars end.”


September 23, 2010

Postscript: Murray Sayle

Posted by Jon Michaud

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/backissues/2010/09/postscript-murray-sayle.html#ixzz22zhAJiMT


Letter from Hiroshima

DID THE BOMB END THE WAR?

by Murray Sayle

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1995/07/31/1995_07_31_040_TNY_CARDS_000373616#ixzz234whgWbZ


21 posted on 08/10/2012 12:38:37 PM PDT by zipper (espions sur les occupants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

Retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Paul Tibbets Jr., left, and his grandson, then-Capt. Paul Tibbets IV, pilot the last flyable B-29 Superfortress. General Tibbets was the pilot in command of the “Enola Gay” when it dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, on Aug. 6, 1945. Now a colonel, the younger Tibbets is the Air Force Inspection Agency commander at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M. Courtesy photo

http://www.militaryavenue.com/Articles/Face+of+Defense-+Grandson+Carries+on+Grandfathers+Service-38701.aspx

"Colonel Tibbets also shared something his grandfather told him about nuclear weapons: “We hope we never have to use nuclear weapons in anger again,” said the elder Tibbets.

“But if you think about it, we use these weapons everyday as a credible deterrent," stated Colonel Tibbets. "We, as a nation, should never forget that.”"

22 posted on 08/10/2012 12:39:30 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
RE: "it wasn’t until the late 90s that Japan finally acknowledged their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Prior to that time, the Japanese people were never told by their government that Japan had attacked first."

I recall someone who was at the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor (1990s) where they met a teenage American visitor who believed that Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was in response to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

23 posted on 08/10/2012 12:46:56 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

My Dad was a Lt, “90 day wonder”, on an APD in the Atlantic working up for the mainland invasion. He was in charge of the 4 LCVPs on that ship and they were told to expect 80% casualties.
-The bomb probably saved his life, and my existence.


24 posted on 08/10/2012 12:47:29 PM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

How?

Where would the Soviets have gotten the sealift capacity to move enough troops into Japan? We had Andrew Jackson Higgens and the Higgens’ boats (the US Army actually had a bigger fleet than the US Navy by the end of the war!). What did the Soviets have to move troops across open water and land them on a hostile shore?

Really, I’m curious.


25 posted on 08/10/2012 12:49:22 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

What my dad said (after he saw where he was to land after the Japanese Surrender) was they(Janpan) had put BattleShip Guns up in the hills and they would have been able to pick off the Big Ship that that landing craft came out of.


26 posted on 08/10/2012 12:53:37 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

I’ve remarked we didn’t “bomb them back to the stone age” but “bombed them into the 20th century”


27 posted on 08/10/2012 12:56:15 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (OWS = The Great American Snivel War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Yes, the War Department figured everyone “hitting the beach” in Olympic would find up dead, injured, POW, or missing. However, the War Department thought they would be effective enough until that happened for the follow on in February to defeat the Japanese.


28 posted on 08/10/2012 12:59:32 PM PDT by AceMineral (Will work for money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

One thing to comsider when talking about Operation Downfall. The US Army after Okinawa and Iwo Jima put in an Order for Purple Heart Medals and we are STILL using up Purple Hearts from THAT order.


29 posted on 08/10/2012 1:03:00 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper

Right. Tell me again where the soviets would get the sealift capacity to invade Japan, land troops, and keep them supplied?


30 posted on 08/10/2012 1:08:21 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

The thought at the time...as I recall from the book “Day One”, was that if we gave a demo the Japanese military would have likely thought it was a trick of some sort. And there was a risk the bomb wouldn’t go off which would have been counter productive.

Also, we couldn’t afford to give demos: we didn’t have enough material on hand to make more than 3 bombs: and we set all 3 off.

Actually, it may have been enough for 4, but the premise is the same...we couldn’t waste the material - remember, at the time no one was really positive what the Russians were going to do. There were people worried the Red Army wasn’t going to stop in Berlin and that we’d be having to use a nuke on them.


31 posted on 08/10/2012 1:09:09 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (OWS = The Great American Snivel War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Had we invaded Japan, the fighting would, literally, have been house-to-house as predicted. The Japanese soldiers were smart, clever and willing to die for their emperor.

I don’t doubt that we might have ended up fighting Stalin for the parts of Japan that they might have ended up controlling. In Germany, that’s what the Berlin Airlift was about.

Things were delicate, to say the least, for many years after Japan’s surrender.


32 posted on 08/10/2012 1:15:58 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
I recall someone who was at the USS Arizona Memorial at Pearl Harbor (1990s) where they met a teenage American visitor who believed that Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was in response to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

And, this is a surprise to whom?

Given the poor state of American education from the union propagandists these days, American kids know plenty about homosexuality, putting condoms on cucumbers and what a great leader zero is, but not much else.

33 posted on 08/10/2012 1:21:42 PM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Why?
The Japs would learn all they needed to know when we took out a city, and we wouldn’t waste an A-bomb (we only had three...).


34 posted on 08/10/2012 1:24:08 PM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=56&load=1808

This is IMO a very good piece Bill Whittle from PJTV did on Hiroshima anniv. 2009 which discusses the “demo” possibility.

You may have to sign up (free) or you may get a few views for free before you have to do so.


35 posted on 08/10/2012 1:34:36 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

***4. How the Soviet Union single-handedly won WWII***

I’ve already heard that.

The US wasn’t needed at Normandy as the Russians, pushing from the East had the situation well in hand.

The bombs didn’t make the Japs surrender, it was the invasion by the Russians.

Next thing you know we will be just spectators in that war.


36 posted on 08/10/2012 1:34:36 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Tyrannies demand immense sacrifices of their people to produce trifles.-Marquis de Custine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Good point. The book Hell to Pay discusses that. I was over 800 words and made some tradeoffs. In his book Giangreco covers analyses closer to August which make one conclude the order should have been about 1,000,000.


37 posted on 08/10/2012 2:13:52 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: zipper

I know some people (particularly the Japanese who want to portray themselves as innocent victims) try to make that case, but in all the sources I have seen discussing the reasoning of the contemporary Japanese leadership that point is not mentioned. Beyond destroying the Kwantung in China there wasn’t much the Russians could do. They had no amphibious navy and the Japanese knew that. The Japanese also knew the Soviet army in East Asia was at the far end of the longest logistic train in all history, and that the Americans had all they could do to supply their own forces. The final battles arguments in the sources I have seen mention inflicting losses on the Americans. They do not take into account the Soviets. Japanese preparations for invasion focus on what the Americans may do, not the Soviets. To me the maturing Japanese knowledge of us and this comprehensive silence provides a strong argument against that position.


38 posted on 08/10/2012 2:37:54 PM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Retain Mike

I have always thought that it was a damn shame the we only had two atomic bombs to drop on Japan in 1945.

(A recent thread here on FR says otherwise, I have not yet found any other information to that effect.)

I also think we should never have blown up all those pretty little Pacific islands testing bombs. We should have just declared Japan as the Western Pacific Testing Range, and done it there.

My father was a Marine at Pearl Harbor, Guadalcanal, Tarawa, and Saipan, and was scheduled for the invasion of Japan. So add me to the list of those who might not even be here except for the atomic bombs.


39 posted on 08/10/2012 2:49:39 PM PDT by G-Bear (Always leave your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushMeister
The displacement of the so-called traditionalist view within important segments of American opinion took several decades to accomplish. It will take a similar span of time to displace the critical orthodoxy that arose in the 1960s and prevailed roughly through the 1980s, and replace it with a richer appreciation for the realities of 1945. But the clock is ticking.

There are several annoyances I have with the traditional narratives. Many seem to want to put the Atomic Bomb in Isolation, without the multiple reverses the Japanese had suffered in the summer before the Bomb, and the planning of the US invasion that they had intelligence of. The Fast carrier fleet was bombing targets up and down the east coast of Japan. The Soviets were crushing Japanese Army Units in Manchuria.

But I also think that it is just as well that we did not make good on Bull Halsey's boast that when this war is over Japanese would only be spoken in hell. I believe that dropping the Bomb had a part to play in that outcome.

40 posted on 08/10/2012 3:08:02 PM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson