Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Rocks, Hits Back, Stands Up, Deliversand Gets a Seat at the Convention Table
Vanity | 23 July, 2012 | RitaOK

Posted on 07/23/2012 9:55:15 PM PDT by RitaOK

Ron Paul cooperates with no one, checks his voice for no one and doesn't much like the GOP establishment types. This would include the GOP's likely nominee, Mitt Romney, template maker in Massachusetts for all things nefarious accomplished by Barack Hussein Obama but brought to a national audience.

Paul has declined to endorse Romney, but given the army of organized pitchforks he has attracted over the course of a run or two at the party nomination, the man has won a seat at the convention table.

USATODAY.com reports that room will be made for Ron Paul in the convention, and it is reported that Paul's platform delegates are being included in the planning of the platform document. Additionally, GOP planners have lent assistance in Paul's arrangements for using the Sun Bowl in Tamap to host a rally for his supporters.


TOPICS: UFO's
KEYWORDS: 2012rncconvention; 2012rncplatform; 911truther; 911truthers; apaulling; apaulogia; apaulogist; charliesheen; cino; convention; crazyloon; fff; fino; georgesoros; owslovesronpaul; paul2012; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulistinians; rino; ronpaul; ronpaullovesows; soros; sorosownsronpaul; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last
It's nice to see what seriousness and having a message gets you, when you don't give up, give in, go wobbly, don't cave, don't duck, don't quit, don't wait, don't pander and mostly, DON'T ASK.

I believe the old boy EARNED THIS.

Good for Ron Paul.

1 posted on 07/23/2012 9:55:25 PM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Does he plan to read excerpts from his loony racist newsletters?


2 posted on 07/23/2012 9:58:16 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

I can’t even muster the energy to post the “Not this S**t Again” graphic.


3 posted on 07/23/2012 10:01:12 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The safest road to Hell is the gradual one." Screwtape (C.S. Lewis))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

This is a good thing unless we want the convention to be a coronation for Mitt.


4 posted on 07/23/2012 10:03:01 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Any man who thinks that a country like Iran having nuclear weapons is OK has shown such naivety of the very nature of evil that he has no place in leading a free people.


5 posted on 07/23/2012 10:03:56 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK; Absolutely Nobama; BlackElk

Will he be inviting his buddies at Stormfront?


6 posted on 07/23/2012 10:05:28 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

PaulTards are fun to laugh at.


7 posted on 07/23/2012 10:06:37 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

And yet, no to Sarah Palin, at the GOP Convention? No, to Senator Jim DeMint, at the GOP Convention? No to Newt Gingrich, at the GOP Convention?


8 posted on 07/23/2012 10:08:51 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

9 posted on 07/23/2012 10:09:15 PM PDT by GQuagmire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

The article reports something like the guy has 500 delegates ready to rumble and the GOP doesn’t want him off doing a rally on his own like he did last time. They are being very accomodating to everyone’s favorite uncle. /s

I am so jealous his army pulled it off and ours scattered like sheep.


10 posted on 07/23/2012 10:09:25 PM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

It is disappointing that so may quit so easily.


11 posted on 07/23/2012 10:11:26 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel; Proud2BeRight
"I can’t even muster the energy to post the “Not this S**t Again” graphic."

Here, maybe this will help....

Photobucket
12 posted on 07/23/2012 10:12:17 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting Anyone but Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I’m not certain that the Paul campaign is even in debt, since that was the POINT of his entire campaign, and he didn’t run harder than he could afford, like everyone else felt compelled to do.

I admit it, I like his style, even with the problems from some of his substance. Where he did score with “the folks” and the young adults he scored with a bull’s eye.


13 posted on 07/23/2012 10:17:31 PM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
"And yet, no to Sarah Palin, at the GOP Convention? No, to Senator Jim DeMint, at the GOP Convention? No to Newt Gingrich, at the GOP Convention?"

He didn't do this by himself!

Where are the loyal backers of DeMint, Newt, Sarah, etc??

Not A peep out of them.

CRICKETS

14 posted on 07/23/2012 10:18:04 PM PDT by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
“Good for Ron Paul.”

Ron Paul is a sleazy, dishonest liar who worked to get Romney the nomination all the while pretending to be independent. During the debates Ron Paul was Romney's little attack dog. He went after the other candidates and protected Romney.

Ron Paul has been in Congress since the 1970’s. He is the ultimate Washington insider. During his time in Washington the size of government increased dramatically and Ron Paul did nothing about it.

Ron Paul is supported by Code Pink. He called traitor Bradley Manning “an American hero”.

Ron Paul is a lying hypocrite and the country would be better without him.

15 posted on 07/23/2012 10:21:12 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
OMG!
Prepare a flamesuit against the libertarian usefull idiot leagues!
LOL!
16 posted on 07/23/2012 10:30:43 PM PDT by sarasmom ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xZsFe6dM3EY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

I am so thankful that this will be the last time rupaul will be peeing in the punchbowl.


17 posted on 07/23/2012 10:33:24 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Oh Really?

TT


18 posted on 07/23/2012 10:33:34 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Radical islam is islam. Moderate islam is the Trojan Horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

BFL


19 posted on 07/23/2012 10:44:28 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Ron Paul is not a libertarian. Ron Paul is a slimy opportunist and a lying Romney attack dog. I am surprised there are still people in this world stupid enough to believe anything he says. Someone should post all the Stormfront stuff and the other sick garbage Ron Paul supports.


20 posted on 07/23/2012 10:45:41 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Ron Paul is dangerous.

Ron Paul, Soros and Defense

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4q1vYx1V3g&feature=related

Before everyone gets their panties in a wad. Obama is already starting to make the moves to destroy our military.
Ron Paul will just drive the knife into their backs.
I thought it was clever how the Obama military haters are going to cut Benefits for veterans and wounded soldiers.
Wonder how far enlistment will drop on that one.

 

One of Ron Pauls best friends is George Soros..

http://www.orangepower.com/threads/george-soros-evil.95549/


21 posted on 07/23/2012 10:47:10 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

So it seems you’re warming up to him.


22 posted on 07/23/2012 10:53:13 PM PDT by Gator113 (***YOU GAVE it to Obama. I would have voted for NEWT.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

First, posting personal rants in the News forum is poor FR etiquette.

The USA Today article does not show Ron Paul fighting with the Romney people; rather, it describes him in close cooperation with them. Paul has not publicly endorsed Romney but has almost certainly promised to do so.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-07-22/ron-paul-gop-convention/56420234/1
“GOP makes room for Rep. Ron Paul at Tampa convention”


23 posted on 07/23/2012 10:58:41 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Photobucket
24 posted on 07/23/2012 11:02:13 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Huh?

Thanks for the help? I think. (I do appreciate the link very much. I couldn’t get it to post into my very first vanity.)

“Rant”? Where?

Etiquette?

The point IS that Ron Paul has not endorsed Romney.
The other point IS that Ron Paul got a seat at the table anyway, without endorsing Romney, quite without etiquette.

I never said a word about the article showing “Ron Paul fighting with Romney people”, though, it is obvious to all he is not enthusiastic to endorse Romney. The man knows how to bargain. A seat at the table in exchange for an endorsement. See how it’s done?

The article, on the subject of an endorsement, did NOT say Ron Paul “has certainly promised to do so”.

It was an opinion paragraph with the beholder’s eye choosing to call it a “rant”.

We post and learn. You are free to do a bang up better job than I, and I would be delighted to see it, actually. But, you didn’t.


25 posted on 07/23/2012 11:32:45 PM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

at the children’s table?


26 posted on 07/23/2012 11:46:25 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

If Romney and his team really think Paul’s going to bring more actual votes to his ticket than Palin...I’m shaking my head here.


27 posted on 07/23/2012 11:48:45 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I thought we were done with RuPaul.

*SIGH*


28 posted on 07/24/2012 12:06:48 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK; All; mnehring

In all actuality, it’s RuPaul’s fault that we’re stuck with Mitt Trotsky as the Republican nominee. Bachmann, Gingrich, and Santorum were assaulted day in and day out and in ad after ad by RuPaul and his Army of Paultards. The three Conservatives had to spend more time and effort (and not to mention money) than was necessary on Scoobey Doo Villian Paul and his outrageous attacks on them.

If you want to congratulate Jew hater Paul for basically giving us the choice between a Marxist in Chairman Obama and a socialist in Mitt Trotsky, be my guest. It’s a semi-free country after all. But when it’s all said and done, it was RuPaul who helped the leftward path we’re on now.

When it’s all said and done, Ron Paul will be a meaningless footnote in American history, and rightfully so. He wasn’t a Conservative, he wasn’t a libertarian, and he certainly wasn’t a “champion of the Constitution” like he claimed on the campaign trail. He was a kook, on the same level as Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich.


29 posted on 07/24/2012 12:23:20 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

It’s easy to get support when you say no gov’t, no taxes, etc.
He promised the sky that he could NEVER deliver - it just sounded good! People lose their brains and ability to think with some of these politicians. RP ia not an honest man.

What Newt promised he KNEW he could deliver - and, also, the things he would change; like reign in the activists judges - he knows the law of the land like no other candidate!


30 posted on 07/24/2012 12:29:20 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

The invites to speak have not gone out yet as of last Friday night. That about Chris Christie is from a staff member or someone who wanted him. I can see that happening but it is not set in stone.


31 posted on 07/24/2012 12:33:25 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

The invites to speak have not gone out yet as of last Friday night. That about Chris Christie is from a staff member or someone who wanted him. I can see that happening but it is not set in stone.


32 posted on 07/24/2012 12:36:03 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

As you know, Newt was my favorite also.

I didn’t follow Ron Paul’s campaign but for his role in the debates, where I applauded right along with the audience applause, but booed when the audience booed. When he was right, Ron Paul was dead on right, but then he could come up with the darndest ideas and blow it all.

Whatever, he sure came up with an organization and will have influence beyond the primaries, according to the article in the USAToday.

Astounding that he cooperated with no one, and is now being taken care of and accomodated, while our side is in shambles sitting on the outside looking in.


33 posted on 07/24/2012 12:48:51 AM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Thanks Rita and pay no attention to the boob-brains, I don’t. :)


34 posted on 07/24/2012 1:06:03 AM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
He didn't do this by himself!

Where are the loyal backers of DeMint, Newt, Sarah, etc??

That's what I took from it too. Ron Paul's at the head of a genuine mass movement, which will permanently affect American politics. I don't quite know how, but he's been spectacular (given what he believes) at reaching the young. I've said it before and I'll say it again: Ron Paul was the long shot who, by all conventional rules, should have remained obscure.

The secret to his success is his, or at least his message's, appeal to youth. Sometimes, I wonder if some of the criticism of him here results from jealousy and sour grapes.

For the first time in a very long time, there's a good chance that a youngster will go off to college and not come back a liberal. The Ron Paul movement has accomplished that feat.

Moreover, for those who think that Ron Paulism is a genuine danger, there's reason for hope down the line. Once Ron Paul retires, his movement will likely fade into the background. Many people will say that it will have faded away entirely. But, the movement will have left a definite residue: a permanent skepticism about the use of government - and not just in war, either.

Remember, demographers such as Neil Howe were predicting that the Millenials would be a new "Greatest Generation" devoted to public service. In other words, they'd be a new breed of self-confident liberals. The Ron Paul movement has gone a long way towards derailing that.

Also, keep in mind that kids who are conservative at heart become genuine conservatives when they mature. Rand Paul is already being denounced by libertarians as a sellout: here, for example. Many of today's Ron Paul youths might well be middle-age Burkeans in twenty years' time.

Now that primary season is effectively over, it might be worth everyone's while to drop the hostility towards the Ron Paulians on these two grounds:
a) Libertarian is better than liberal;
b) The kids will grow out of it.

There's evidence that some libertarians are conservative at heart. The notion that "libertarian" implies "pro-choice" is actually controversial in those circles. At least one hard-core libertarian has argued in digital print that a true libertarian must be pro-life.

And what if the Ron Paulians grow up to be liberal? If they do, then they'll be liberals with foxes in their bosoms. They will be less confident when pushing government "solutions," and some of them will always be half-hearted.

Primary season is now over for Ron Paul, permanently. There's less reason to be aggressively defensive now - and more reason to leave a key under the "Go Away" mat.

35 posted on 07/24/2012 1:18:36 AM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

Sarah doesn’t have any delegates and hasn’t endorsed the nominee.

I’m not sure what you mean by ‘no’ to DeMint and Newt. I’m not aware of them asking for something and being told ‘no.’


36 posted on 07/24/2012 2:15:16 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

When Romney wins Nov 6, the looney, mentally-unbalanced Paultard gutter-rats will get thrown under the bus on Nov 7, where they belong. With all the dead and illegal lib-dem trash going to vote, it’s AB0 (Anybody But 0bummer), and Mittens/GOPe need *everyone* to get the Traitor-in-Chief out of The White Crib/Hut, even the crackpot fringers.


37 posted on 07/24/2012 3:07:02 AM PDT by carriage_hill (All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

No, really, if Mitt’s people are telling him that Sarah Palin would be a cancer on the campaign and Ron Paul wouldn’t, he needs to fire them. Not because they hate Sarah Palin, but because they’re idiots. And if he doesn’t see that, he’s an idiot.


38 posted on 07/24/2012 3:23:34 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
It's nice to see what seriousness and having a message gets you, when you don't give up, give in, go wobbly, don't cave, don't duck, don't quit, don't wait, don't pander and mostly, DON'T ASK.

I believe the old boy EARNED THIS.

Good for Ron Paul.

Ah, another "Paul-Bot" has self-outed.

I knew sooner or later all ye who Hate Mitt and Mormons and who no doubt (at least the majority thereof) come from the camp of disalusioned and sore losers who supported this wack job would make their true reasons for attacking Mitt known and I was not to be dissapointed.

39 posted on 07/24/2012 4:41:26 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Will Paul talk about the Israeli concentration camps?


40 posted on 07/24/2012 4:45:31 AM PDT by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

The secret to his success is his, or at least his message’s, appeal to youth. Sometimes, I wonder if some of the criticism of him here results from jealousy and sour grapes.

The youth are able to see that the emporer has no clothes. The establishment of both parties are little more than mafia using government to take from the people that actually make the country work and give it to the well connected. Any serious conservative would insist on a Fed audit. Whether or not Paul is who people think he is, there is a sizeable chunk of voters who are fed up with tweedle dee tweedle dum politics and Paul has tapped into it.


41 posted on 07/24/2012 4:49:20 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

I knew sooner or later all ye who Hate Mitt and Mormons and who no doubt (at least the majority thereof) come from the camp of disalusioned and sore losers who supported this wack job would make their true reasons for attacking Mitt known and I was not to be dissapointed.

Oh please. People hate Mutt for the same reasons that they hate Kennedy, Obama, and Hilary. He’s a leftwing, big government type that will just push America down the road to destruction.


42 posted on 07/24/2012 4:53:06 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

We need to realize that we (that’s a TEA Party “we”) have a lot in common with the Ron Paul supporters. A lot of them don’t like his stance on Iran, for instance, and are very much with us on fiscal responsibility issues. Let’s not create future divisions where they should not exist by being too harsh on his followers, as many here are (not you, I’m just not naming names).


43 posted on 07/24/2012 4:53:52 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Well put, and see my previous post.

I spent a good bit of time talking to Paul delegates at GA GOP conventions this year. We need to work with these folks, we as conservatives have a lot in common with them. They dislike the GOPe as much as we do, but in many cases mistake us for being part of them. Explaining that is how I learned they often don’t like Paul’s foreign policy blissninnyism.


44 posted on 07/24/2012 5:01:40 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

RuePaul won’t endorse Mitt, but was all too happy to cooperate with him in the primaries to eliminate anyone who could stop Romnet. Pure hypocrite.


45 posted on 07/24/2012 5:17:54 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

I knew sooner or later all ye who Hate Mitt and Mormons...


The ‘religion card’ is getting as old as the ‘race card’.


46 posted on 07/24/2012 5:57:17 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

The face of the GOP establishment is changing here in Maine.

Of the 81 seats on the state GOP committee, 38 are now held by ‘liberty’ candidates elected in county caucuses during the state convention.

More heat is being applied to the upper echelons of the state party with regard to which candidates get supported and which do not in local races.

Many of the party loyal neo-cons are being left behind by a group of hard working true conservatives and liberty minded types who should be the future of the party.

Here in Maine - It’s not your father’s GOP


47 posted on 07/24/2012 6:14:35 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan
Sometimes, I wonder if some of the criticism of him here results from jealousy and sour grapes.

IMHO, the criticism of him here results from an epidemic of total Constitutional ignorance.

A LOT of what we're told the Constitution 'says' as we're growing up is bass-ackwards to the intent of the actual Compact.

48 posted on 07/24/2012 6:15:45 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

The way it is done in America is to include small coalitions within the parties.

The inclusion of Paulites to the group at the table is evidence the system is functioning.

What will they accomplish? We will see. Will they accomplish everything they desire? No

They are however there and have not run away and guaranteed to accomplish nothing


49 posted on 07/24/2012 6:21:02 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

I agree. RP served his purpose there and it was never to win.


50 posted on 07/24/2012 8:10:38 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson