*****************************************EXCERPT**************************************
****************************************EXCERPT**********************************
quidsapio says:
A victory for what science Phil? What science supports the contention CO2 is a pollutant?
This is a victory for science. The Court noted that the EPA relied on assessments by the IPCC, USGCRP and NRC and stated:
These peer reviewed assessments synthesized thousands of individual studies on various aspects of greenhouse gases and climate change and drew “overarching conclusions” about the state of the science in this field.
REPLY: It might be a “victory for science”, and the poor science pushed by eco-activists like Hansen and McKibben, but it is also a tragedy for America. – Anthony