Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shale Play in Western Siberia is 80 Times Bigger than the Bakken
Oil Price.com ^ | 6/6/12 | James Burgess

Posted on 06/10/2012 4:00:58 PM PDT by Recon Dad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Kennard
It's a real crap shoot. It could be a bust, but they learned from the Baaken that the early numbers are usually low.
You have to believe it's probably the most unexplored area of land in the world. Hell, when the first geologist landed in Saudi Arabia in the early 1900’s he would have had less to go on then present day folks. Exxon's willing to gamble.
41 posted on 06/10/2012 7:32:57 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
I couldn't find this region on a map but "Western" Siberia sounds like a long long way from China. Remember Russia is about ten time zones wide.
42 posted on 06/10/2012 7:37:51 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
And what can you do when you have a large restless bunch of young men? Start a war!

But seriously I have read where the better off young Chinese males,not rich just working middle class, have resorted to taking Filipino,Laotian,or Cambodian wives. I've also read where Chinese workers in Africa have taken Africans as wives.

43 posted on 06/10/2012 7:48:24 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BBell

I keep expecting a really big African expedition. Most of the other likely places would have too much possibility of being too painful militarily. Africa? Who would go to war for any of the African countries against a Chinese occupation?


44 posted on 06/10/2012 7:59:36 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard; Vendome

I was wondering about that as well. It could be as far west as just east of the Ural Mountains. Which would put it a long way from China, especially the heavily populated/developed parts.


45 posted on 06/10/2012 8:03:46 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Well the Chinese are investing heavily in Africa. The Chinese are buying up mineral rights and laying down the groundwork for a very large African infrastructure that will support their big African expedition. I wonder if there is a Chinese Kurtz out there?


46 posted on 06/10/2012 8:45:31 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I told my kids that before I die the world will be awash in oil again.


47 posted on 06/10/2012 8:46:15 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (You've been screwed by your government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Siberia belonged to myChina 180 year ago.

Nope. The Ching Empire ruled what is now Manchuria and Mongolia, and possibly a little way to the north, but you can't say it "ruled Siberia."

Well, you can say it, but that doesn't make it true. :)

The Yuan (Mongol) Empire ruled much of what is now Siberia, or as much of it as they cared to bother with, but that was China being ruled by the same foreign power, not China ruling Siberia.

48 posted on 06/10/2012 8:47:14 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

This should put watermelon enviros in a quandary regarding the “dangers of fracking”, eh?


49 posted on 06/11/2012 4:17:45 AM PDT by Amagi (I challenge Barack Obama to call this Tea Party Patriot a "tea bagger" to my face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Wasn’t it just a year ago the Libs were warning about the end of oil...


50 posted on 06/11/2012 5:39:01 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; Recon Dad
Wasn’t it just a year ago the Libs were warning about the end of oil...

There are many who believe or want US to believe that PEAK OIL is real and that we're very close to having used up all those dead dinosaurs and organic matter deposits. What was a common belief over the last 150 years, that crude comes from "fossil" material, I believe is now being debunked. Maybe Recon Dad can speak to what many of us consider to be a more scientifically sound theory: Abiotic Oil.

(theory suggests that crude oil is the result of naturally occurring and possibly ongoing geological processes. In its simplest form, the theory is that carbon present in the magma beneath the crust reacts with hydrogen to form methane as well as a raft of other mainly alkane hydrocarbons. The reactions are more complicated than this, with several intermediate stages. Particular mineral rocks such as granite and other silicon based rocks act as catalysts, which speed up the reaction without actually becoming involved or consumed in the process.)

51 posted on 06/11/2012 5:55:24 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

theory suggests that crude oil is the result of naturally occurring and possibly ongoing geological processes.

.....I believe in the oil fairy and he’s been a very busy little guy!


52 posted on 06/11/2012 12:25:20 PM PDT by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson