Posted on 06/06/2012 8:46:02 AM PDT by doug from upland
Blame it on the goose
Got you feeling loose
Blame it on Patron
Got you in the zone
Blame it on the a a a a a alcohol
Blame it on the a a a a a alcohol
Blame it on the vodka
Blame it on the henny
Blame it on the blue top
Got you feeling dizzy
Blame it on the a a a a a alcohol
Blame it on the a a a a a a alcohol
Well one station says Wisconsin has a surplus another says that it doesn’t. I don’t really believe anything that comes from the Media anymore until I investgate myself. Where can you find the real numbers?
Yes, I lived in Fargo when he was on the air.
There was even talk of him running for state-wide office
as a Republican.
Well I learned one thing from watching the socialist frauds at CNN and MSNBC. Obama will win the EXIT POLE ELECTION becoming the FIRST EXIT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. And that’s the truth as he is going to EXIT STAGE LEFT in November.
Anyone watching “RACHEL MADDOW” for insight on government experties, is mentally among the same group that watch “HANNITY” expecting the same.
They are both flip sides of the same coin IMHO.
Pandering to the chior of ignorant for personal financial gain.
Well, it certainly is more likely after last night’s results. If Obama must put resources into Wisconsin to win it, he is in big trouble.
I only have six things to say to Special Ed and that other fella, Rachel... B - O - O H - O - O.
I think Schultz just goes where he can make the most money. I believe most of what comes out of his mouth is just an act. He gets paid to give speeches to liberal groups including unions and MSNBC pays his salary. He was a conservative when they paid him. He is a person with ahallow convictions and will say anything and go anywhere for the money.
###
I think you are 100% correct. Schultz would have liked to have been the next Rush Limbaugh, but Rush and others had the corner on that market so he just switched sides. He never gave a satisfactory reason why he switched to being a liberal. Something about Bush and the Patriot Act and the Iraq war, if I recall correctly. Pretty lame excuses to do a 180 on everything.
Mmmmm their tears are soooo tasty. I love to taste the sweet tears of liberal defeat in my coffee. Mmmmm their tears taste like fine nectar.
Mmmmm their tears are soooo tasty. I love to taste the sweet tears of liberal defeat in my coffee. Mmmmm their tears taste like fine nectar.
Mmmmm their tears are soooo tasty. I love to taste the sweet tears of liberal defeat in my coffee. Mmmmm their tears taste like fine nectar.
Mmmmm their tears are soooo tasty. I love to taste the sweet tears of liberal defeat in my coffee. Mmmmm their tears taste like fine nectar.
Oh man. That video was totally new to me and I had no idea who was talking. I SWEAR to everyone - I thought it was a guy talking! I don’t watch Rachel Maddow but I thought I would recognise her voice better. Maybe it was the low quality or something but it actually surprised me when it showed who was talking.
If Schultz is a mouthpiece for whoever is paying him, he’s just another David Brock! The ultimate insult.
Eric Hoffer said something along the lines of; a fanatic is a fanatic. A fanatical communist will also make an excellent fanatical Nazi, for the fanatic only needs a cause, and it matters not what that cause may be.
Marx is dead.
Lenin is dead.
Stalin is dead.
Che is dead.
Ho Chi Minh is dead.
Pol Pot is dead.
Teddy Kennedy is dead.
Hugo Chavez is dying.
Fidel Castro is dying.
All your heroes are dead or dying. Barry is doomed. If Jeffery Immelt is smart, he will put all of his MSNBC anchors under lockdown suicide watch. We wouldn't want these Kool-Aid drinkers to check out too soon before they see their god, Barry Hussein Soetoro-Obama, crash and burn before their disbelieving eyes.
He called laura ingraham a slut, and now wants to pee on a man.looks like this fag cqcksucker wants to come out of the closet and blow oboma like larry sinclair.
I really don’t know how MSNBS (whoops, misspelled) and CNN are still on the air.
All I can figure is that conservatives give them a bump in the ratings when they turn it on to watch the looneytoons.
Blessings, Bobo
Are you attempting to be “fair and balanced” by lumping Hannity with Maddow? And what are “experties”? Small experts?
No, not attempting to be fair and balanced, just honest. They are just flip sides of the same ignorant, parroting coin.
Maddow is to the left the exact same thing Hannity is for the right. Neither is going to remotely truly inform you or educate you, just regurgitate their political parties talking points ad nauseum, regardless of what is actually being discussed.
If you are watching either of those shows, or listening to either of those blowhards with the intent of hearing something knowlegeable coming out of either of their mouths you will wind up just as ignorant if not more so than before you listened.
They may have guests that might provide true knowledge from time to time, if you are lucky, but the hosts themselves are both parrots, just on different sides of the isle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.