Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASHVILLE: Parents charged for allowing daughter, 15, to have sex with 21-year-old
WSMV-4 NBC ^ | 5/21/12

Posted on 05/21/2012 10:21:30 PM PDT by SmithL

Parents may pay the price for an illicit love affair between a teenage girl and her grown-up boyfriend.

Stephen Rogers Jr. faces a charge of statutory rape, but police have also charged his girlfriend's parents with child neglect.

The parents admitted they didn't stop the relationship, in fact they did something to signal their approval.

She's 15. He's 21.

Bottom line: Their sexual relationship broke the law.

But some do not see this as a black-and-white kind of issue.

The young love between a 15-year-old girl and her 21-year-old boyfriend has this neighborhood taking sides.

"Some 15 year olds may be able to handle it, and some may not," neighbor Virginia Presnell said.

"He seems like a good guy," neighbor Angela Moore said. "I know there's an age difference, quite an age difference, but they're actually a really good couple. They're almost one of those perfect little couples you never see anymore."

Police arrested and charged Stephen Rogers Jr. on a single charge of statutory rape, but he's dated the 15-year-old for months.

Her parents liked Stephen, and six months ago, they invited him to live with their daughter inside their home.

Some neighbors saw a problem.

"I don't think a 15-year-old should be with a 21-year-old," Presnell said.

But some neighbors like Moore seem conflicted.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: statutoryrape; tennessee; tn; underagesex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Houghton M.

I agree with you. They were letting this guy live in their home and “sleep” with their daughter. If they were letting her marry him that would be different. Although I wouldn’t approve of that either.


21 posted on 05/22/2012 4:57:13 AM PDT by timeflies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.

“You and a dozen others who cite instances of marriage at 13 and 21 or whatever miss the point: those instances involved marriage...”

That was my first thought.


22 posted on 05/22/2012 4:58:30 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I don't understand why everyone on this thread is talking about their 15-year-old great-grandmother getting married to a 20-year-old man.

These two weren't married. They were permitted, if not invited, to have a shack-up relationship in her parents house. For those of you who think only of the bottom line and think morality is nonsense, if the girl gets pregnant and the guy leaves her (quite common), who do you think pays for their child? You do.

Even secular conservatives ought to favor marriages and intact families. That's the bulwark against government control over everything. We can start by not drawing an equivalence between a 15-year-old shacking up with a 21-year-old, and marriage between any male and female, regardless of their ages.

23 posted on 05/22/2012 5:05:54 AM PDT by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timeflies

“Although I wouldn’t approve of that either.”

Eggzackly. And why wouldn’t you approve of letting her marry him at 15? Because (tell me if I’m wrong), you figure that at 15, esp. with a 21-year old, she’s probably not really making a level-headed, mature decision. But we know, instinctively, that marriage is a major decision, one not to be taken lightly, one that requires maturity.

But screwing each other? No big deal. Nothing to see here. No consequences—they can screw for a while than split up and then come back and screw some more and who cars? No legal consequences, no financial consequences, no social consequences. Paradise for the young man.

Of course there are moral, pyschological and other consequences for screwing around outside of marriage, but our society claims they don’t exist, that marriage is just a piece of paper.

So, precisely because marriage really meant something back when the grandparents and aunts and cousins mentioned upthread got married at age 13 or 15, it was scrutinized carefully and marriage that young was the exception, not the norm.

Now screwing is normal from age 7 onward and who cares? Just having fun. Nothing more.

Ain’t it wunnerful?


24 posted on 05/22/2012 5:10:35 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

These parents should be charged, they are horrible.

What kind of perverts are they? Do they think they live in Hollywood or something?

Here is a good rule for parents to use on their kids:

When you are old for sex, MOVE OUT


25 posted on 05/22/2012 5:50:38 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yank in the UK

The rule should be that if you are old enough for sex, you can MOVE OUT and take care of yourself.


26 posted on 05/22/2012 5:53:51 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

My late uncle, who was one of the smartest men that I ever had the pleasure of knowing, explained “the rule” of age differance:

“Half your age plus seven years is the youngest you should date.”


27 posted on 05/22/2012 6:05:13 AM PDT by Ueriah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
My Aunt and Uncle were married when he was 32 and she was 16. They had the blessing of all family members and went onto have a wonderful loving, marriage. Although he passed away while she was still young and she remarried, it was always understood by her second husband that my Uncle was the love if her life. Her second husband was welcomed into our family, lovingly and he often spoke highly of my Uncle he'd never met. He is now buried in our family plot, next to my Uncle!

Politicians can't make better decisions than loving parents can.

28 posted on 05/22/2012 6:09:54 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Kevin Jennings would probably be ok with the age difference, but he might object to the heterosexuality of it all....


29 posted on 05/22/2012 6:12:50 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"He seems like a good guy,"

He isn't.

30 posted on 05/22/2012 6:16:51 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

My friend was 15 when he started dating a 21 year old woman. Now 11 years later they are married. As another poster mentioned they were both terrified she would get charged with statuary rape and kept things discrete.


31 posted on 05/22/2012 6:17:35 AM PDT by trailhkr1 (All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtBaldy

Either that or polygamy.

Guess the western world hasn’t reached rock bottom yet.

Looks like it will be a rough landing when it does.


32 posted on 05/22/2012 6:18:40 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
I have aunts who were married by age 15. Yes their husbands were older by a few years. A marriage between a 15 year old and a man 21 was not that uncommon for the generations born during WW2 and before.

The key distinction here is between marriage and no-commitment sex. If a 20-something guy with a job was marriage-serious about a 16-year old daughter of mine, I would be OK with it.

33 posted on 05/22/2012 6:23:13 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Houghton M.
You and a dozen others who cite instances of marriage at 13 and 21 or whatever miss the point: those instances involved marriage. Especially when the grandparents and aunts and others being mentioned here got married, marriage was for keeps.

No I think you missed the part of my comments where I said I would not condone or allow them having sex with me knowing about it. But if their urges became too strong I said let them marry. I'm 54 and there were several girls in my high school who were in fact married. Actually the allowed age to marry varies or did vary then widely state too state with Georgia I think being the lowest age Without parental permission.

34 posted on 05/22/2012 8:22:00 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
It is 2012 and most 13 year olds are not running a farm.

Yep. At thirteen they can't legally run a french fry machine or hold a job.

I'm not sure that is an improvement.

35 posted on 05/22/2012 8:26:58 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The key distinction here is between marriage and no-commitment sex. If a 20-something guy with a job was marriage-serious about a 16-year old daughter of mine, I would be OK with it.

I agree. The situation they allowed in their home I would not have allowed though even if daughter was 21.

36 posted on 05/22/2012 8:30:10 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Lock the whole family away and toss the key..


37 posted on 05/22/2012 8:56:23 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The part DCS Tennessee won't say is this. Had the person been a live in boyfriend of the mother it would not be as serious too them as this. If the 15 year olds divorced from mom stays a week say with her dad who is involved in a bi-racial affair with another woman and lets the 15 year old sleep in bed with them that in the eyes of Tennessee DCS would also be OK. That is a cultural thing you see.

The ages of the girl and man in question were within the normal relm of what society a generation ago accepted as old enough for a marriage with an age space about normal between the couple.

They were stupid IMO {the parents} to allow what was going on in their home outside of marriage. In other words they should have told them OK if you insist on this then we insist on a license and a commitment to each other. Believe me the DCS is far more Liberal than even the girls parents. But they will use this as a case where they go all out. In the mean time true molesters and true abusers have a reunification plan written by DCS.

38 posted on 05/22/2012 9:56:34 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ueriah

My rule:

No! until your 18

after you are 18, who gives a crap?


39 posted on 05/22/2012 2:23:55 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: trailhkr1; Morgana; null and void

any adult having sex with a 15 year old should be shot.

Adults are supposed to have good judgement and some kind of maturity, these people obviously do not have that.


40 posted on 05/22/2012 2:29:49 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson