Posted on 05/21/2012 6:32:12 PM PDT by Innovative
>>“You have seen numerous FReepers who want Obama to win but only two or three honest enough to admit it.”
How godlike, that you know the minds of people you’ve never met.<<
If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, you don’t have to be a god to know, it’s a duck.
By their fruits you will know them.
What I said.
You say in your signature line: “(ABOs are Romneybot trolls”
Is Sarah Palin a “Romneybot troll” since she declared that she will work to help ABO elected?
where did she endorse Romney? ABO could be anybody including ‘not Romney’ for whatever reason. Now it looks like its going to be Romney but I’ll wait and see until she says “I endorse Romney
>>What I said.<<
Well, actually you said it with more finesse.
(but I’m just a mom!)
“By their fruits you will know them.”
Like abortions, for instance. Indeed.
Looks like you have a problem with the English language, that you claim that “Anyone But Obama” means “not Romney”.
Yeah, She says ‘Anybody But Obama’ but can’t mention Romney’s name....take a cue from her -— Romney name must be so disgusting to her that she couldn’t even say it with nobody running against him in the Primary now.
FUBO!!!
Specifically, that refers to FR ABOs.
When did Willard change his official name to ‘Anybody but Romney’?
"Anyone but Obama"
She will also work hard to get a more conservative congress, which is where she said her main efforts would be.
She clearly doesn't want Romney as the candidate, but unlike some here understands that the alternative is unthinkable.
“If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, you don’t have to be a god to know, it’s a duck.”
If it aborts like Obama, taxes like Obama, bugger-cuddles like Obama, lies like Obama, and mandates like Obama, one doesn’t have to be anything but honest to recognize it is equivalent to Obama.
Looks like you have a problem with the English language, that you claim that “Anyone But Obama” means “not Romney”.
**************
Agreed. It means absolutely anyone. Hillary. Reid. Pelosi. Malik Shabazz. Anyone at all.
Name one and show the post..Ill show u history in the making...*G*
To freepers claiming to refuse to vote for li’l ole mittens...
As I see it, there is only one way this is going to turn out good for you, and 3 ways it will turn out bad.
first, lets look at the possible outcomes:
1. obama wins, and our situation worsens
2. obama wins, and our situation improves(haha, I know)
3. romney wins, and our situation worsens
4. romney wins, and our situation improves
There is only one way this election can go and will NOT make you look like a fool...and that is number 3, if romney wins and our situation worsens. Every other outcome is a loser for you. So help me understand why you keep saying you refuse to vote for mitt? The primary is effectively over, folks. Mitt won. We got snookered. Time to move on. Sarah Palin is NOT going to pull a rabbit out of a hat at the convention and get herself the nomination. Ain’t happening so come back to reality.
We all know there is a difference between mitt and barry. We all know the difference is too small for us to be happy about it. But there is a difference.
What am I missing?
Define situation improving.
The only notable difference between the two is party affiliation.
LMAO...U have a way with words....Stick a fork in him..He’s done!
That's me, baby! :::::waving:::::
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.