Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Cover Shows 3-Year-Old Breast-Feeding
ABCNews ^ | May 10, 2012

Posted on 05/10/2012 8:57:14 PM PDT by Steelfish

May 10, 2012 11:24am Time Cover Shows 3-Year-Old Breast-Feeding

This week's cover of Time Magazine shows a mother nursing her 3-year-old son.

Should a mom continue nursing her child even after he’s too big to be held in her arms? For mothers who practice what’s known as “attachment parenting,” the answer is an emphatic “yes” — and some are more than happy to demonstrate.

This week’s cover of Time Magazine shows Los Angeles mother Jamie Lynne Grumet nursing her 3-year-old son, who reaches her breast with the help of a chair.

“When you think of breast-feeding, you think of mothers holding their children, which was impossible with some of these older kids,” photographer Martin Schoeller said in a Time Magazine online story explaining the cover photo. “I liked the idea of having the kids standing up to underline the point that this was an uncommon situation.”

The cover story illustrated by the photo takes a look at the philosophy of attachment parenting today — which, in addition to extended breastfeeding, also promotes co-sleeping and using slings to “wear” infants — and its roots in the 1992 parenting guide, “The Baby Book” by Dr. Bill and Martha Sears.

Time also posted photos of other nursing mothers featured in its story, including Missouri mom Dionna Ford of Kansas City, Mo., shown here at right with her four-year-old and five-month-old children.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: attachmentparenting; billsears; breastfeeding; parenting; thebabybook; williamsears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2012 8:57:16 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Just preparing the kid for a lifetime of sucking on the government teet.


2 posted on 05/10/2012 8:58:23 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yeah, that is creepy as being a gov teat sucker.

I think kittens are weened at 6 weeks, guess I got breast milk for a few months, little brother did too, but at some point you gotta cut the teat feeding off.

That just don’t go on for 3 years without some weirdness in the mom’s mind. Something sexually bizarre or otherwise twisted and strange. And having it photographed and put on the cover a magazine, that is Obama-grade funk.

Just my humble opinion, worth exactly what you paid for it.


3 posted on 05/10/2012 9:04:22 PM PDT by West Texas Chuck (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. That should be a convenience store, not a Government Agency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

You mean there’s going to be a Time or a Newsweek that does not have Obama on the cover? Amazing!!!


4 posted on 05/10/2012 9:04:37 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The cover is a blatant attempt to generate controversy. Nothing wrong with extended breast feeding. Something very wrong with the way the photo is posed, which frankly does sexualize nursing.


5 posted on 05/10/2012 9:08:20 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

Well, yes and no. There is a boob in the picture, right?


6 posted on 05/10/2012 9:08:56 PM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Haven’t seen the picture but a lot of times breastfeeding photographs are presented in a way that makes them almost soft porn.

Breastfeeding is what God made breasts for. Taking pictures of breasts while a baby is breastfeeding isn’t really a necessity.

I imagine the article is trying to make an issue out of a 3 year old breastfeeding? Time needs to focus on their favorite guy, zero, and his udder (pun intended) failure as a leader.


7 posted on 05/10/2012 9:09:11 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

Ping (pun intended also)


8 posted on 05/10/2012 9:13:12 PM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Midget porn?


9 posted on 05/10/2012 9:13:24 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yadent

At least two.


10 posted on 05/10/2012 9:15:47 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"If I were that kid, I'd breast feed until I was 16 or 17."
11 posted on 05/10/2012 9:18:06 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason ("Journalism is dead. All news is suspect." - Noamie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I thought the cover was Pedophile Teacher of the Year.
12 posted on 05/10/2012 9:25:31 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Out of respect for others and dignity for motherhood, women should be discrete when breastfeeding. I did it and no one would have know I was nursing in public. This woman is immoral, to use her child this way. To treat such an intimate act like a freak show is to remove dignity from both motherhood and nursing.

Here’s my Marxist rant again. It is right out of Marx—Read Brave New World. They make the word “mother” revolting. Marx wants women in the workplace and the raising of kids left to the State so they can shape the plastic mind. This is repulsive to both mothers, girls and offensive to boys and men. More of forcing hate and revulsion at human beings and nature.

Time is intentionally trying to create disgust for a beautiful concept of a mother nursing her baby. Friedan must be laughing in hell.


13 posted on 05/10/2012 9:26:09 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Signs of the times.


14 posted on 05/10/2012 9:29:32 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

In nature (and in my family) if you have a mouthful of teeth you are too old to breastfeed!
15 posted on 05/10/2012 9:32:27 PM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Well written!


16 posted on 05/10/2012 9:37:55 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

you read my mind!


17 posted on 05/10/2012 9:38:24 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
This stuff just goes hand in hand with all the other bizarre parent child relationships of today...what a mess. Any woman who has such a photo taken has a few marbles rattling upstairs.....

...course money talks!..at which case she would be using the kid for monetary gain in a posed position .... which could indeed be considered soft porn.

The nation is totally desensitized....or this would not have been published.

However the public outcry...no skin off her nose...she'll be going to the bank and it'll be forgotten.

18 posted on 05/10/2012 9:51:52 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Envious males will develop a sudden interest in Time.
19 posted on 05/10/2012 9:54:12 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yadent

LOL


20 posted on 05/10/2012 10:12:01 PM PDT by Dogbert41 ("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It looks criminal to me. No breastfeeding child should ever reach an age that it will have a memory of the act.


21 posted on 05/10/2012 10:13:32 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tioga

Wow, I had only seen a head shot of that photo. I did not see the kid standing on a chair. That was so deliberately provacative. If you only look at the kid’ss face, he could be still 2. Seeing him standing there was a bit disturbing.


22 posted on 05/10/2012 10:29:14 PM PDT by Explorer89 (And now, let the wild rumpus start!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

23 posted on 05/10/2012 11:10:53 PM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I see nothing wrong with breast feeding even in public, there is nothing sexual about it. However, sensationalizing it like this is ridiculous. I have wondered, historically, at what age children were weaned from breast feeding. I would assume that children would be weaned when they were capable of eating real food, which they obviously can at 3. What age do tribal people wean? Does anybody know?


24 posted on 05/10/2012 11:28:02 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Wrong on so many levels.


25 posted on 05/10/2012 11:29:42 PM PDT by varina davis (A real American patriot -- Gov. Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Primative woman would likely be pregnant again within two years. This seems unnatural. It would seem nature’s way to foster physical independence by the time the kid eats solid food, can feed himself and is independently mobile.

Humans are hard-wired to be raised by a clan of about 20. This gives them exposure to a variety of experience, skills and survival strategies. Such extended relationships would also provide insurance of survival.

This seems to stifle emotional development of the child. I predict and extremely rebellious teen as he tries to break free of Mom and become an independent adult. Either that, or he will be a dependent emotional cripple.


26 posted on 05/10/2012 11:30:47 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

What next, portraying Bonobo incest for humans, as it is natural with one of mankind’s closest relatives.


27 posted on 05/10/2012 11:35:44 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (I'll be a nice to you as you'll let me be, or as mean as you make me be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I’ve heard that an in-law of mine did this to an even higher age. She is a very smart individual and wanted her children to have optimum brain development, based on the nutrition from human milk. Her kids have turned out fine.


28 posted on 05/11/2012 12:37:06 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sea Parrot

I knew three families that practiced extended breast feeding.

All three families were downright weird about many things and extended breast feeding was just one of the symptoms.


29 posted on 05/11/2012 12:39:28 AM PDT by american_ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How can that kid only be 3 ? He looks the size of a 9 or 10 year old.


30 posted on 05/11/2012 1:50:44 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


31 posted on 05/11/2012 2:15:38 AM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This month’s Time magazine cover shows how bad taste has become mainstream and that it’s been that way for at least an entire generation.


32 posted on 05/11/2012 2:19:52 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casie

Perfect!


33 posted on 05/11/2012 2:22:23 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Heck, I try it as often as possible and I’m errr retired.
Never too old.:^)


34 posted on 05/11/2012 2:29:40 AM PDT by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Breastfeeding, Bullys, and Birth Control are the 3 cause-celebres of the Left.
35 posted on 05/11/2012 2:33:24 AM PDT by Hacksaw (If I had a son, he'd look like George Zimmerman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
What age do tribal people wean?

Average age of weaning in "traditional" societies is commonly claimed to be 4-5. But the range is enormous.

A lactating woman is considerably less likely to become pregnant, so breastfeeding is to some extent a natural contraceptive or way of spacing children.

36 posted on 05/11/2012 2:33:57 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
“The cover is a blatant attempt to generate controversy. Nothing wrong with extended breast feeding. Something very wrong with the way the photo is posed, which frankly does sexualize nursing.”

Exactly! This is not a tender Mary Cassatt painting. TIME wreaks of desperation peddling copies of their irrelevant magazine using a misguided woman's boobs.

37 posted on 05/11/2012 2:37:39 AM PDT by Casie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

38 posted on 05/11/2012 2:40:42 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I know wrong when I see it, this is wrong.

Nuff said!

39 posted on 05/11/2012 2:41:56 AM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

That kid looks closer to four than three...as you can see; the photoshops are already popping up...this arrogant, self-indulgent mother has made that kid’s life a living hell...they just don’t know it yet.


40 posted on 05/11/2012 2:47:48 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
If the female breast evolved solely for nursing it would be a barely noticeable chest spigot like on other primates.

Instead, because humans developed a taste for face to face “bonding,” the woman's breast mutated to imitate the buttocks which swell, attracting male attentions, in all female primates when in estrus.

Natural Selection made the female breast a sexual enticement in order to add to the woman's physical attractiveness because lasting pair bonding in a species where young are long developing is vital.

So according to Anthropology 101, female breasts are both functional (though very large mammaries can obstruct infant breathing) and sexual by nature...and Time is obviously exploiting the latter.

41 posted on 05/11/2012 2:55:02 AM PDT by Happy Rain (Apparently the song "Ebony and Ivory" is a political ditty about Barrack Obama and Barney Frank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Now that the Obama Gay Marriage thing is ratcheting up, I can only guess what kind of sucking the next Time Magazine cover will show.


42 posted on 05/11/2012 3:05:06 AM PDT by broken_arrow1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

“the woman’s breast mutated to imitate the buttocks which swell, attracting male attentions,”

That may explain why so many women think they deserve to have their asses kissed.


43 posted on 05/11/2012 3:11:43 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Gretawire’s blog says the child is 4 years old, instead of 3.

Looks 6.

Either way it’s offensive. It was meant to be.

I hate the age of Obama.


44 posted on 05/11/2012 3:15:34 AM PDT by Freddd (No PA Engineers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

this arrogant, self-indulgent mother has made that kid’s life a living hell...

. . .

I feel so bad for her son. His mother was wrong to allow herself and her son to be posed that way. It degrades them both.

They could at least have left his name out of the story so that as he grows and gets googled, this isn’t the first thing people learn about him. Kids can be merciless and it’ll probably raise a few prospective employer’s eyebrows.

Real clever there, mom and Time.


45 posted on 05/11/2012 3:22:47 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All

46 posted on 05/11/2012 3:39:11 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Just preparing the kid for a lifetime of sucking on the government teet.

You beat me to it.

47 posted on 05/11/2012 3:43:52 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

48 posted on 05/11/2012 3:49:28 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Hello, weird part of reality. We meet again.


49 posted on 05/11/2012 4:04:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“weird part of reality.”

what’s weird is how hard they appear to be trying to put the weirdness over on us.


50 posted on 05/11/2012 4:11:14 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson