Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why were 10 dead bodies found in Benjamin Franklin’s basement? (Ambassador's London residence)
IO9 ^ | April 14, 2012 | Lauren Davis

Posted on 04/14/2012 11:25:49 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

Why were 10 dead bodies found in Benjamin Franklin’s basement?

In 1998, a group called the Friends of Benjamin Franklin House began renovations on Franklin's London residence, No. 36 Craven Street, and discovered a nasty surprise: 1,200 pieces of bone from 10 bodies, six of which were children. And the bodies were buried in the basement around the time Franklin was living in the house.

No, Franklin didn't engage in a murder spree in between penning Poor Richard's Almanack and flying kites in lightning storms. In fact, it's unlikely that the bodies were murder victims at all. The bones were sawed through and bore scalpel marks, suggesting the bodies were used for an anatomical study. And it just so happens that Franklin's dear friend William Hewson, whose mother-in-law owned Franklin's home, was a student of the famed anatomist William Hunter. Historical speculation holds that Hewson, after digging up these bodies or paying a "resurrection man" for the remains, set up a lab in Franklin's basement for his own anatomical studies.

The question remains, however: did Franklin know about the bodies? It's possible that he participated in, or at least witnessed Hewson's studies, but Hewson could have used the basement — and then buried the bodies — when Franklin wasn't around. Without further historical evidence, we can't know if the bodies in the basement would have been as much of a surprise to Franklin as they were to the renovation team.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; History; Miscellaneous; Science; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 1757; 1775; ancientautopsies; benjaminfranklin; england; foundingfathers; franklin; godsgravesglyphs; grossanatomy; london; mystery; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: DogByte6RER

The Enlightenment was kind of an odd time period (by our standards) in regard to the dissection of human cadavers — done truly in the name of science — because there was a tremendous amount of prejudice against letting it be done at all. So otherwise perfectly respectable doctors and scientists were doing backdoor deals with “resurrection men” who would go steal the cadavers after the burial so that the doctors could take them apart and try to actually learn something about the human body. I am a big Franklin fan — we actually gave his name to one of our boys — and I would not be a bit surprised if he wasn’t there for some of the dissections. It fits in perfectly with both his “man of science” persona and his “naughty man of the world” persona.


21 posted on 04/14/2012 2:27:10 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (If you back Newt . . . then SEND HIM MONEY!! "Be Breitbart, Baby!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

If Obama had a son... Ben Franklin would have eaten him...


22 posted on 04/14/2012 2:27:41 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Photobucket
23 posted on 04/14/2012 5:08:16 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson