Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congresswoman: ObamaCare could lead to limiting women to having two children
Life Site News ^ | 3/14/2012 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 03/14/2012 9:42:37 AM PDT by Morgana

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 13, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – The founder of the House Tea Party Caucus is warning that the Obama administration’s pro-contraception stance and disregard for religious liberty could lead it to restrict the number of children American women are allowed have.

Last Tuesday, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, R-MN, told GBTV’s “Real News From The Blaze” program she disagreed with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ argument that paying for contraceptives saves money by reducing health care costs – and that her analysis sets a dangerous precedent. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, R-MN

“Going with that logic, it isn’t far fetched to think the president of the United States could say…we need to save health care expenses…[so] the federal government will only pay for one baby to be born in the hospital per family. Or two babies to be born per family. That could happen.”

“I’m not saying he is going to do it,” Bachmann clarified. “I’m saying he has the power and authority to do it.”

“Michele Bachmann is correct. There’s nothing that prohibits Congress and the federal bureaucracies from saying they will only pay for up to two births,” John Vinci a staff attorney for Americans for Limited Government, told LifeSiteNews.com. “Constitutionally, nothing prohibits the federal government from rationing the health care it subsidizes.”

“Certainly what Congresswoman Bachman claimed is not out of the realm of possibility given what we know about the extreme views of some members of the Obama administration, and the new powers they have assumed via Obamacare,” agreed Father Peter West, vice president for mission for Human Life International, in a statement e-mailed to LifeSiteNews.com.

Vinci, who edits the website ObamacareWatcher.org, said the economic principles of national health care make rationing inevitable. “Because of scarcity rationing must occur,” he told LifeSiteNews. “Under a healthy free market system, scarcity is regulated by price. With ObamaCare, we have rejected free market principles of price as the regulator of scarcity and have replaced it with bureaucrats.”

Mandating “free” contraception, and requiring employers to pay for a host of other services, will hasten the process, he said. “Since drug manufacturers no longer have to compete on price, what keeps them from raising their prices? And when the federal government figures out that health care costs are rising, nothing keeps them from limiting the benefits through rationing.”

Fr. West said moral principles also underlie such a decision. “In 1968’s Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI made four famous predictions, all of which have come true. The fourth had to do with the coercive use of contraception by governments, and we see this most clearly enforced in China with their abusive one-child policy.”

With the passage of the Affordable Care Act, he said, “we see the framework for tyranny even in the United States.”

“Obama’s science czar, John Holdren, has openly advocated for coercive government population control, including forced abortion. Vice President Joe Biden ‘understands’ China’s destructive one-child policy and couldn’t bring himself to condemn it once challenged on his statement.”

In his 1977 book Ecoscience, co-authored with population control advocates Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Holdren wrote, “compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” Holdren also called for “a comprehensive Planetary Regime” to set appropriate population levels for every country in the world.

Vice President Biden told a Chinese audience he was “not second-guessing” the nation’s one-child policy during a visit last August.

“The more we find out about ObamaCare,” Fr. West told LifeSiteNews, “the more we learn that it is a blank check for the administration to do whatever it wants, unchecked by Congress, and in complete disregard for the Bill of Rights.”


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: abortion; contraception; obamacare; prolife
Pardon me for putting it this way but, no shit!
1 posted on 03/14/2012 9:42:42 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Constitutionally, nothing prohibits the federal government from rationing the health care it subsidizes.”


2 posted on 03/14/2012 9:44:29 AM PDT by griswold3 (Big Government does not tolerate rivals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Correction: limit WHITE women to having two kids...Obumbles still wants blacks and Latinos to have tons of kids they can’t pay for.


3 posted on 03/14/2012 9:45:05 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Actually, I believe that HHS will establish the precedent through forcing abortion on welfare moms and justify it as a way to limit welfare spending.


4 posted on 03/14/2012 9:55:11 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Bump


5 posted on 03/14/2012 9:55:20 AM PDT by lowbridge (Rep. Dingell: "Its taken a long time.....to control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
I don't see anything in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution that gives Congress power over ANY health care.

/johnny

6 posted on 03/14/2012 9:58:12 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

you don’t think they’d pay for the delivery of a Baby with a disability do you?


7 posted on 03/14/2012 9:58:12 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
you don’t think they’d pay for the delivery of a Baby with a disability do you?

Hitlers population control program started this way and look how that turned out.

8 posted on 03/14/2012 10:02:54 AM PDT by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Only two kids then after that you get $3000 dollars of birth control.


9 posted on 03/14/2012 10:04:10 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This country is so screwed it isn’t funny.


10 posted on 03/14/2012 10:07:10 AM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Agreed. This should be brought home clearly to the minority women!

“Two children and no more! If you keep getting pregnant the government will abort as many of your children as needed to ensure that you don’t have a big brood. It serves the financial goal of limiting welfare costs. (We liberals also note that it serves both the eugenic goal of improving the overall stock of humans and as a crime control measure.)”


11 posted on 03/14/2012 10:09:47 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

No they won’t; the Welfare recipients are the members of the welfare plantation run by the Democrats to produce votes. Babies born on the plantation don’t even have to show up at the polls for their votes to be counted anymore; welfare moms are actually just producing “voter i.d.s”. You haven’t been reading up on how they steal elections in practically every major U.S. city, have you.


12 posted on 03/14/2012 10:11:10 AM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Don’t forget the muslims.


13 posted on 03/14/2012 10:42:51 AM PDT by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
You are so right. And with the mandatory ultrasound, it's all lining up perfectly:

* all medical records belong to the gov’t as a result of stimulus
* government requiring ultrasounds (now only in some states if you want abortion, but how soon will it be mandatory for all pregnancies?)
* board-of-15 mandating medical treatment (i.e., abortion) based on results of ultrasound.

I can't get it through my friend's head that just because they give you an insurance card to carry in your wallet, that doesn't mean you will get the actual medical treatment you seek. A disabled fetus could conceivably be denied all medical care based on pre-existing conditions. If you follow the oh-so-beloved UK model, you cannot get medical care out-of-pocket, out-of-system, or you are banished from the system for life.

14 posted on 03/14/2012 11:36:28 AM PDT by JustSurrounded (Repeal it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s even worse... at a $1 a month per American worker. Obamacare will generate $1.8 Billion in revenue for abortion coverage... that’s enough to terminate every single pregnancy in our country every single year. If the policy extends to every citizen, it’s enough to kill every baby twice.

Horrifying.


15 posted on 03/14/2012 5:13:34 PM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson