Given the situations you gave as an example, you actually accept the idea of giving them legal responsibility for a decision as important as that?
I think the bigger questions are about what can be done without -their- substantive consent, where they cannot possibly understand the whole situation. That gets into some tricky ground.
I don’t understand why parents wouldn’t have to be involved, of course. I kinda’ jumped over that and was going for a different point. It doesn’t make any sense that parents would be left out.
INDEED.
Evidently some folks think that . . . CONTRARY TO SCIENTIFIC FACT . . . it's quite reasonable to . . .
in essence
set a terrarium with a rainbow colored highly poisonous viper in it down in front of an 8-16 year old and let the child decide whether they want to take it out and play with it or not.
It is provable that the judgment centers of the brain DO NOT fully mature until around age 25-30.
The globalists know that it's idiocy to give children such choices. They advocate it deliberately as a way to destroy the family; destroy the Judeo/Christian culture; destroy society . . . to make it easier to raise the satanic globalist world government and society on top of the ashes of the 'old order.'
They sell well the lie that their Babylonian satanism is a "New" world order.