Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

And why would it ever occur to them that the prehistoric artist would NOT be painting what he saw/

8 posted on 11/08/2011 7:00:30 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic

I’ve always liked the way the ancient artists “signed” their painting with a stencil of their hand. Reaching across 35,000 years, that ancient artist says “I did this”!


9 posted on 11/08/2011 7:13:03 PM PST by 6SJ7 (I'm an AmeriCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Other parts of the paintings are exaggerated or abstracted. (The horse forms in particular.) It doesn’t seem unreasonable to believe other aspects might have been abstracted from or emphasized beyond literal reality.

With no evidence of spotted horses existing at that one it wasn’t a totally unreasonable speculation.


17 posted on 11/10/2011 8:54:28 AM PST by texanred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson