Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bristol physicists break 150-year-old law
University of Bristol ^ | July 19, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 07/20/2011 7:59:33 AM PDT by decimon

A violation of one of the oldest empirical laws of physics has been observed by scientists at the University of Bristol. Their experiments on purple bronze, a metal with unique one-dimensional electronic properties, indicate that it breaks the Wiedemann-Franz Law. This historic discovery is described in a paper published today in Nature Communications. In 1853, two German physicists, Gustav Wiedemann and Rudolf Franz, studied the thermal conductivity (a measure of a system’s ability to transfer heat) of a number of elemental metals and found that the ratio of the thermal to electrical conductivities was approximately the same for different metals at the same temperature.

The origin of this empirical observation did not become clear however until the discovery of the electron and the advent of quantum physics in the early twentieth century. Electrons have a spin and a charge. When they move through a metal they cause an electrical current because of the moving charge. In addition, the moving electrons also carry heat through the metal but now it is via both the charge and the spin. So a moving electron must carry both heat and charge: that is why the ratio does not vary from metal to metal.

For the past 150-plus years, the Wiedemann-Franz law has proved to be remarkably robust, the ratio varying at most by around 50 per cent amongst the thousands of metallic systems studied.

(Excerpt) Read more at bris.ac.uk ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: cooperpairs; purplebronze; stringtheory; superconductivity

1 posted on 07/20/2011 7:59:34 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thermo couple ping.


2 posted on 07/20/2011 8:00:28 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I hope it carries a hefty jail sentence and/or fine.


3 posted on 07/20/2011 8:00:33 AM PDT by MWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Not much of a law then.


4 posted on 07/20/2011 8:01:23 AM PDT by frogjerk (Greedo did not shoot first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Arrest them.breaking the law is breaking the law. I don’t care if they are physicists.


5 posted on 07/20/2011 8:01:29 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire but I swear I didn't see him in the rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

First she’s on Dancing with the Stars
Then she buys a mansion in AZ
Then she has a NYT best selling book
Now, a University is named after her!

Wow! Bristol Palin is on the move!!!


6 posted on 07/20/2011 8:02:07 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (This message carfully checkd to misteakes by powerful softwhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Phonons and Fermi-levels.


7 posted on 07/20/2011 8:02:58 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Perhaps this is connected to the nearby thread — “Men who buy sex commit more crimes, study finds”


8 posted on 07/20/2011 8:03:25 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
This thread needs a Judas Priest soundtrack.
9 posted on 07/20/2011 8:03:26 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
For the past 150-plus years, the Wiedemann-Franz law has proved to be remarkably robust, the ratio varying at most by around 50 per cent amongst the thousands of metallic systems studied.

50% variance? That's barely a suggestion, much less a law.

186,000 miles per second speed limit ... now that's a law.

10 posted on 07/20/2011 8:04:55 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The Dems demanding shared sacrifice are like Aztec priests doing it while cutting out my heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
The new one we'll call Obama's Law.

It only applies to what he says it does.

11 posted on 07/20/2011 8:07:05 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie; All

The really interesting thing here is that the metal is 100,000 more heat conductive than expected. There are serious commercial implications/uses to this.


12 posted on 07/20/2011 8:09:50 AM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: decimon; All
the electrons split into two distinct components or excitations, one carrying spin but not charge (the spinon), the other carrying charge but not spin (the holon). When the holon encounters an impurity in the chain of atoms it has no choice but for its motion to be reflected.

The technical details for those of us that wanted to know how.

13 posted on 07/20/2011 8:10:04 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farlander

A non-conductive heat sink for power electronics, LEDs, etc.

It has real uses, not just a gee-whiz factor for nerds.


14 posted on 07/20/2011 8:12:06 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: farlander

I wonder what was expected?

A lot of spin? Or lack of spin?


15 posted on 07/20/2011 8:17:49 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: farlander
The really interesting thing here is that the metal is 100,000 more heat conductive than expected. There are serious commercial implications/uses to this.

Wow. That's pretty neat!! So much for the LAW, huh?
16 posted on 07/20/2011 8:18:09 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: decimon

If this “law” 150 years old, shouldn’t it be considered “settled science” and thus beyond question?


17 posted on 07/20/2011 8:21:06 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney; neverdem

Sounds interesting. As you point out - IF (big “IF” there) it works out in practice, there could be a lot of applications.

(But the “science” was settled” wasn’t it? “Everybody” agrees on the “scientific consensus” involved, right? Where have we heard that recently?)


18 posted on 07/20/2011 8:21:27 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney
A non-conductive heat sink for power electronics, LEDs, etc.

Apparently.

Maybe internal combustion engines - get the heat from where you don't want it to where you might want it. Put the waste heat to work.

19 posted on 07/20/2011 8:23:21 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
Wow. That's pretty neat!! So much for the LAW, huh?

A natural law or physical law is a description of observed regularities of behavior. It's not necessarily the case that it will apply in all situations. And it's certainly not true that there are "laws" that physical systems must obey.
20 posted on 07/20/2011 8:23:31 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Oh no this can't be true a CONSENSUS of scientists have agreed on the Wiedemann-Franz law so the science is settled and no further research is needed. (global warming sarcasm)

This is why Al Gore and the other global warming hoaxers are not true users of the scientific method. Science is never settled and is always open to new investigation to prove or disprove hypotheses.

21 posted on 07/20/2011 8:24:30 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

What’s next? Ice-Nine?


22 posted on 07/20/2011 8:26:16 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Oh, well, any excuse to buy a new gun is good enough for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

purple bronze = Li 0.9 Mo6 O 17

The paper: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v2/n7/full/ncomms1406.html


23 posted on 07/20/2011 8:30:09 AM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
This historic discovery is described in a paper published today in Nature Communications.

I would say it was discovered 15 years ago by Kane and Fisher and finally verified experimentally by this group. Not to take anything away from their achievement.

24 posted on 07/20/2011 8:30:36 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

It’s effectively a one dimensional heat sink (and it works better at lower temperatures).

I guess a composite material with trillions of such doped 1D chains ‘baked in’ would act as an effective sink. However: dispersal of waste heat from electronics does seem a better fit than bulk heat transfer from engines.


25 posted on 07/20/2011 8:34:22 AM PDT by agere_contra ("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

And when he says it applies... and only how he says it does....and, by definition, it never violates the laws of physics, even if it actually does.....


26 posted on 07/20/2011 8:40:14 AM PDT by Pecos (Constitutionalist. Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_IX


27 posted on 07/20/2011 8:46:25 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP

Thanks. I did a search on ‘purple bronze’ and came up blank.

It would seem that there is no bronze in purple bronze.


28 posted on 07/20/2011 8:47:47 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: All

DONATE

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing $10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your buck!
Please Sign up Now!


29 posted on 07/20/2011 8:48:51 AM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR as a platform to pimp your blog for hits!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I thought this was going to be about opening a bootery on Sunday.

ML/NJ

30 posted on 07/20/2011 8:49:30 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
It's not necessarily the case that it will apply in all situations.

Laws are not descriptions. They are explanations. The LAW predicted that action A would happen under a certain set of conditions. Action A did not happen. Law violated.
31 posted on 07/20/2011 8:51:59 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head

Interesting.


32 posted on 07/20/2011 9:11:59 AM PDT by Marie Antoinette (Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty

We have plenty of other laws with caveats, they don’t work in this or that situation.


33 posted on 07/20/2011 9:18:51 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: decimon

alchemy...


34 posted on 07/20/2011 9:24:36 AM PDT by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

“A natural law or physical law is a description of observed regularities of behavior. It’s not necessarily the case that it will apply in all situations. And it’s certainly not true that there are “laws” that physical systems must obey. “

So true, but when we use the shorthand word “law” most people think of it as a settled, unchangeable thing.


35 posted on 07/20/2011 9:31:31 AM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Unpossible, that was Settled Science.
36 posted on 07/20/2011 9:33:03 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (From her lips to the voters' ears: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "We own the economy" June 15, 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Oh no... what’s that poor girl getting into now?....


37 posted on 07/20/2011 10:17:22 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
We have plenty of other laws with caveats, they don’t work in this or that situation.

Then the law changes and that is fine. What I simply stated was that the experiment with the purple bronze violated the existing defined law.
38 posted on 07/20/2011 10:36:59 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...

Thanks decimon. Pooper cares ping.
purple bronze, a metal with unique one-dimensional electronic properties, indicate that it breaks the Wiedemann-Franz Law
Danged nanny-physics laws, anyway.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


39 posted on 07/20/2011 4:08:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon
.... the Wiedemann-Franz law has proved to be remarkably robust, the ratio varying at most by around 50 per cent amongst the thousands of metallic systems studied.
Close enough for government work.
40 posted on 07/21/2011 4:55:56 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson