Palin has much more Government experience than Mitt Romney, and she was effective and popular as Governor and in her other offices, Romney was a failure, and unpopular.
Romney was unable to run for reelection as he desired, and he left that 48 months in office as a failure with 34% approval.
And what does Romney have to do with this discussion? I thought we were talking about Sarah Palin. Those on here afflicted with MDS have to drag him into every discussion. But since you did at least Mitt finished the job, Sarah quit and if you don’t think that will be a issue with the non-Palinsta, independent voters, those pesky people who decide elections, you are sadly mistaken. 30 month as governor, a stint as mayor of a tiny Alaska town and a few years on an appointed board is not a great presidential resume’. Add to that her 37% approval/55% disapproval ratings among likely voters and she comes across as a candidate that only a zealot who didn’t care about winning could love and support. But as they say it’s a free country so have at it, just don’t try to make her out as the new Reagan/Thatcher/Churchill, it make you look like a fool and diminishes those great leaders.