Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whats the difference between Sir William Wallace & Sarah Palin?
free2think | 02/01/11 | free2think

Posted on 02/01/2011 4:53:24 AM PST by Free2think

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: magglepuss
In my best Yoda Voice...

Ummm... Hazel Eyed Aquarian.... Dream big, she shall, the force and will is strong with this one....

Trust me, I know about Hazel Eyed Aquarians....

101 posted on 02/02/2011 1:58:14 PM PST by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

So you agree with me that Sarah Palin’s actions following her Governorship have been unselfish and not greedy.


102 posted on 02/02/2011 2:51:40 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Free2think

Seriously, dude. Drawing a parallel between someone having their belly slit open, their intestines pulled out with a hook and placed on a brazier to burn in front of their eyes, followed by being beheaded and their body cut into quarters, and ANYTHING that has happened to Sarah Palin is beyond ridiculous. Try to maintain a grip on reality.


103 posted on 02/02/2011 3:06:03 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

No.


104 posted on 02/02/2011 3:14:24 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
So you agree with me that Sarah Palin’s actions following her Governorship have been unselfish and not greedy.

________________________________________

Excuse my previous one word reply, I was interupted.

I do not agree with your statement. The majority of palin's activities since walking away from her elected position early have been geared very specifically toward personal self-enrichment.

I was not there at any of the negotiations for her books, TV shows or speaking engagements so I cannot say if she behaved in a greedy fashion but that doesn't matter because I never said she was greedy.

105 posted on 02/02/2011 3:25:19 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

In that case, what is the limit ex-Governors can earn without being guilty of personal self-enrichment?

Right here is where your case lives or dies.


106 posted on 02/02/2011 5:36:43 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Right here is where your case lives or dies.

__________________________________

I'll try to explain this to you one last time, after that you may chase your own tail to your heart's content.

In spite of your continued mis-statement of that which I have clearly stated I have not made a case or argued a position or engaged in debate about some subjective opinion.

Much if not most of palin's activities since quitting her elected position half-way through her term have been directed towards personal financial gain. The TV deals, book signings and high-price speaking gigs kind of prove that.

Now if you want to argue that feel free but I think you'd have a better chance for success if you were to limit yourself to the above suggested tail-chasing.

107 posted on 02/02/2011 5:51:38 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Free2think
One was a warrior who fought on the battlefield against tyranny. He was hung drawn and quartered.

The other person is just another politician.

108 posted on 02/02/2011 5:56:08 PM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

I’m only helping you to understand your own thinking—how could that be so bad?

Your criticism of Palin is the following: she has engaged in “personal financial gain” since leaving office, and this is a reason not to support her or is some strike against her, or something.

So if the pursuit of “personal financial gain” is the wrong thing for ex-Governors to do, what exactly are the limits?

That’s all I’m asking. Once you’re able to answer it in a straighforward and sincere manner, in all likelihood you’ll experience the peace of mind that comes with a more thorough grasp of your own thoughts.


109 posted on 02/02/2011 6:01:06 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

But Palin has moved her troops forward against a more powerful enemy.


110 posted on 02/02/2011 6:03:12 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
But Palin has moved her troops forward against a more powerful enemy.

More powerful than Longshanks was to the Scots back in that day? C'mon. Think.

And Palin doesn't - and should have troops. It's OUR jobs as individuals to think for ourselves, weigh the policies, look at the facts, and make our own individual decisions in our elections and tactics to take out Obama.

111 posted on 02/02/2011 6:09:36 PM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

Let’s not kid ourselves. We’re up against the worldwide Marxist front. Yes, more powerful than a medieval king on horseback.

And Palin is Obama’s Wallace.

She has troops, whether you like it or not. On the battlefield, the tension always shifts from individualism to collectivism. Without exception.

So in this battlefield in our minds and hearts, we are the troops led by anyone who carries our Constitution. Palin, West, Bachmann and DeMint are among the very few who have never dropped it.


112 posted on 02/02/2011 6:22:56 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
We are not up against summary executions for being a critic of the government. Marxism - AND ALL COLLECTIVISM - is a treat, yes, but we are not under Stalinism right now.

we are the troops led by anyone

Who's we? I lead myself. Politicians, my reps, work for me. I'm part of the board of directors. Shareholders. Boss. If this politician does a good job, I vote to hire/retain the politician. If not, I vote to terminate, like I did Mark Schauer, then I will.

The problem with society is that too many people are weak, are followers, do not think for themselves, and fall for cult of personalities, charismatic politicians, and celebrity politicians. That's how we got Obama, and Billy before that.

113 posted on 02/02/2011 6:42:24 PM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

No, marxism is not a “treat.” Marxism is a lie, and its followers are twofold: useful idiots and tyrants. Both tread the path of foolishness.

To any weakling who forfeits their ability to think for themselves by letting Charles Krauthammer and Karl Rove define Sarah Palin, I say Stand up boy! and fight your own battles.

To any follower who lets George W. Bush or his family define what the tea party is, I say get a grip. Think for yourself.

Understand Sarah Palin by paying attention to Sarah Palin.

To you I say, truth does not flow from the language of man. It’s the other way around.


114 posted on 02/03/2011 6:38:34 AM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
I typoed and meant threat. I agree that Marxism is bad, but it's not Longshanks. I'm not under the impending threat of Marxism taking me out and summary executing me, taking my girl away so some noble could be "first", etc. I can vote Marxists out, just as I did last November, when I helped Mark Schauer get sent back to Battle Creek. Under Longshanks, I'd have no choice but to grab my bows and start firing.

I don't give a rat's butt what Krauthammer, Rove, Bush or any of the talking heads think about Palin, or what Palin thinks about them. They are all politicians who run their mouths. I look at what they've done, not what they say.

To you I say, truth does not flow from the language of man. It’s the other way around.

Truth comes from actions, not language, not words. Palin quit. That was an action. When the pressure was too high as governor of Alaska, she bailed. Yes, I know how the lawsuits worked there. No, I don't care as she could make $500000 easily on the speaker's circuit. She could have also simply said she wasn't running for re-election. That way, she'd finish her contract after a full term instead of quitting. If she couldn't handle that, how can she handle being president?

115 posted on 02/03/2011 11:13:22 AM PST by Darren McCarty (We should lead ourselves instead of looking for leaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

Maybe it wasn’t that she “couldn’t handle it,” but that she thought it was best for the people of Alaska.

This is a strong possibility, based on the facts. Sure, I want to believe it because I’m a fan. But you have to admit its very likely regardless.

Given the fact that Palin has been able to handle far more onslaught since then and still remain poised on camera while discussing it, its even more believable that the “couldn’t handle it” theory is unlikely.


116 posted on 02/03/2011 4:51:32 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson