Skip to comments.
First black hole for light created on Earth
New Scientist ^
| 10/14/09
| Anil Ananthaswamy
Posted on 10/14/2009 11:23:47 AM PDT by LibWhacker
An electromagnetic "black holeMovie Camera" that sucks in surrounding light has been built for the first time.
The device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity.
A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: black; created; earth; hole; light; quantumautomechanic; stringtheory
To: LibWhacker
2
posted on
10/14/2009 11:25:09 AM PDT
by
Billg64
(It is my belief that this is our last opportunity to peacefully protect our republic.)
To: LibWhacker
The Darkton Theory finally has a practical use!
We need a Darkton emitter in every house.
3
posted on
10/14/2009 11:27:07 AM PDT
by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
To: LibWhacker
This is a superior method of focusing sunlight than an array of mirrors because?
4
posted on
10/14/2009 11:29:13 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The People have abdicated our duties; ... and anxiously hope for just two things: bread and circuses)
To: LibWhacker
There is a black hole for your money at the capitol, and another for truth at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington D.C.
5
posted on
10/14/2009 11:30:00 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(FUBO - When 0bama Fails, Freedom Prevails!)
To: LibWhacker
Oh Jeez. Now he’ll win the Nobel Prize for Physics too.
6
posted on
10/14/2009 11:31:34 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
To: LibWhacker
So does this thing actually bend light towards it? or is it merely trapping the light that happens to touch it? seems to me it would be impossible for this thing to actually bend light towards it. I’m not so sure of the usefulness of this invention.
7
posted on
10/14/2009 11:32:13 AM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: LibWhacker
At the point where the shell meets the core, the permittivity of the ring must match that of the core, so that light is absorbed rather than reflected. Permittivity?
That is a new one on me.
Someone is going to have to explain that to me.
8
posted on
10/14/2009 11:32:56 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"This is a superior method of focusing sunlight than an array of mirrors because?"
Such a device could be used to harvest solar energy in places where the light is too diffuse for mirrors to concentrate it onto a solar cell. An optical black hole would suck it all in and direct it at a solar cell sitting at the core. "If that works, you will no longer require these huge parabolic mirrors to collect light," says Narimanov.
Sucks it in from all over Kingdom-come. Instant black-out for the universe.
9
posted on
10/14/2009 11:34:38 AM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
To: mamelukesabre
10
posted on
10/14/2009 11:36:23 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: steve86
LOL
apparently they havn’t got it working 100% just yet then.
11
posted on
10/14/2009 11:36:26 AM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: LibWhacker
12
posted on
10/14/2009 11:37:36 AM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: MHGinTN
How does turning something dark make it invisible? Only in darkness would that work as invisibility. And then you don’t need it.
13
posted on
10/14/2009 11:38:08 AM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: mamelukesabre
Light comes to an object and light leaves an object to be sensed by receptors. If you can bend light to prevent it leaving, you can bend light to make it show what is behind an object rather than revealing the object. In a night sky, prevenmting electromagnetic reflection makes something disappear as it flies over, except for blotting out star background.
14
posted on
10/14/2009 11:46:41 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: Pontiac
Maybe I'm naive and simple but I don't I don't think we should be messing around with stuff like this to start with.
15
posted on
10/14/2009 11:49:28 AM PDT
by
envisio
To: LibWhacker
This can also be used to generate camoflauge fields.
16
posted on
10/14/2009 11:51:02 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
To: LibWhacker
17
posted on
10/14/2009 11:51:23 AM PDT
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: LibWhacker
"I've got a portable hole."
18
posted on
10/14/2009 11:51:52 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: LibWhacker
Sounds like an other perpetual motion machine.
19
posted on
10/14/2009 11:53:39 AM PDT
by
mowowie
To: envisio
I read the entire article and what they describing does not sound like a Black Hole to me.
The article says that the device converts light to heat. My understanding of a Black Hole is that it converts light to mass or X-rays.
To me what they are describing is a frenzel lens for microwaves.
20
posted on
10/14/2009 11:58:45 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: MHGinTN
Or you can just paint it black. Same thing. I see black stuff all the time. It’s not invisible. Except in the absence of light, and then everything is invisible.
21
posted on
10/14/2009 12:00:03 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Pontiac
You don’t do a lot of dating, do you?
22
posted on
10/14/2009 12:00:50 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: Old Professer
Not since I got married.
The wife doesn’t like it when I do.
23
posted on
10/14/2009 12:05:09 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: LibWhacker
Somebody better stop this!!
THEY ARE GONNA DESTROY THE PLANET!!!!!
Minorities and the homeless will be most affected....
24
posted on
10/14/2009 12:15:10 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Mirrors merely reflect light. This device actually captures it.
25
posted on
10/14/2009 12:50:45 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
You can concentrate a helluva lot of light with mirrors. Ask Archemides. There was actually a French solar plant where the U.S. tested components for resistance to nuclear blast effects, “thermal shock”. They rigged the focal point with a fast shutter and than, wham, opened it up for a couple of seconds to see how the unit under test survived the blast.
Another post pointed out the this “draws in light from space”. Basically a graviational lens is just a lens, albeit lossless. Reflective/refractive optics don’t get me excited, even if it’s refraction based on < hushed and awed tones> General Relativity.
26
posted on
10/14/2009 12:59:39 PM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The People have abdicated our duties; ... and anxiously hope for just two things: bread and circuses)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I think that the advantage is the physical size. Also you would not have the problems associated with dirty, fragile mirrors which have to be moved periodically for optimum light reflection.
27
posted on
10/14/2009 1:05:02 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: Conan the Librarian
So when do we get free 3-D / 4-D porn on our televisions from this?
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
The device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity.
Uh, yah. :')
· String Theory Ping List ·

· View or Post in 'blog · Join · Bookmark · Topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·
29
posted on
10/14/2009 2:23:28 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Nothing is reflected or poorly absorbed. All the light is trapped for 100% use.
30
posted on
10/14/2009 2:26:13 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(There is no "gray area" on issues. I see things from both sides, but I choose the right side.)
To: LibWhacker
A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana.
sweet
31
posted on
10/14/2009 2:29:38 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: LibWhacker
32
posted on
10/14/2009 2:31:57 PM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: ConservativeMind
Can you then keep it in a bottle in the refrigerator?
33
posted on
10/14/2009 2:35:45 PM PDT
by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: mamelukesabre
"So does this thing actually bend light towards it? " "steering"or "bouncing" or "continuously reflecting" might be better descriptors...
But then, that wouldn't sound as impressive when begging for the next grant-renewal, grant, or other funding...
34
posted on
10/14/2009 3:10:33 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson