OBAMA ELIGIBILITY- GLEN BECK

..You now appear to be deciding for your listeners which parts of the Constitution are important and which are not. Yesterday, one segment of the Glenn Beck Show dealt with the topic of how the Obama Administration and Democratic leadership are adopting tactics from Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” to villanize and demoralize ordinary American citizens asking questions of their Representatives in town hall meetings. How they are attempting to label people asking questions about Obama’s policies as the “mob”, right-wingers, racists, etc.

During that segment, you completely shocked and disappointed me. A woman asking a question about Obama’s birth certificate appeared on screen and you rolled your eyes and referred to her as that “idiot…” I had instant pain in the pit of my stomach, realizing that Saul Alinsky’s rules are now fully integrated into our society if Glenn Beck automatically denigrates a woman “trying to ask a legitimate question” because it doesn’t fit his game plan. I am not trying to offend you, but don’t you understand that such a statement from you is hypocritical, especially in a segment about ridicule?

I use the phrase that she was “trying to ask a legitimate question” because it is becoming more and more clear that you and many others in the media have succumb to the misinformation regarding this issue. In order for Mr. Obama to legitimately serve as President of the United States, he must be a “natural born citizen”. The Constitutional requirement calling for a “natural born citizen” requires a higher level of citizenship (implying a higher level of allegiance to the United States and her Constitution) to serve; as opposed to what is commonly referred to as being a basic “citizen” of the United States. (Natural Born Citizen = Citizen +Exclusive, Uncompromised Allegiance)

Simply put, ANY talk show host, journalist, political analyst, etc. who even remotely affords any support whatsoever for the “Birther (better termed “Truther”) cause will run the risk of losing his /her job. This is why Hannity, Beck, O-Reilly, Ann Coulter, Geraldo, etc. will NEVER touch this issue. Dobbs was the example and I am convinced they were ALL told: “Want to keep your job ? Then limit the issues to policy criticism ONLY or you will wind up like Dobbs !”

Now my question is, are they getting BONUSES for resorting to childish name calling of the “Birther” movement ? Why else would these “professional, articulate and eloquent” broadcasters resort to such “demeaning” terms when referring to the eligibility enthusiasts ? If you’ve noticed, O’Reilly goes SO FAR out of his way to smirk and giggle in mid-sentence when he so much as even mentions the Dobbs issue while other broadcasters simply roll their eyes in disapproval ! This behavior is SO unnecessarily dramatic and condescending...HATE IT !

Policy criticism will NEVER be grounds for impeachment or a National upheaval, but the eligibility issue is just TOO HOT....so, in my opinion, their hands are tied.

I saw Glenn Beck complain about the OBAMA administration using Alinsky tactics and then Glenn turned around and used the same tactic to describe the lady concerned about OBAMA’s eligibility to be POTUS. I have noticed that Glenn Beck will work the audience up and then at the right moment he will try and sell his book on common sense. I no longer watch both Glen Beck and Bill OReilly.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.