Posted on 04/13/2009 11:39:11 AM PDT by TaraP
Let me ask a question:
Do you mean to say UFO sightings are non-real events, or that merely the names given the events differ based on the level of technology (or culture) that existed during the event?
Thanks for your kind and reasonable words.
Yeah studying a topic since 1962 does leave one with a fair amount of distilled data! LOL.
Now to be more certain what is true and what is disinfo is still a huge challenge.
Some of our UFO threads have such pics of such artworks on them.
I don’t have ready links to them.
Maybe someone else will or you can dogpile it.
Actually, some of the Australian very ancient rock carvings of . . . space visitors . . . do include bug-eyed figures.
INDEED.
And now I have to get to work teaching . . . LOL.
Maybe he should come up with some evidence or eyewitnesses instead of asking us to prove a negative.
Some of us get weary of the naysayers routine assaults, insults and realize that
that’s the only language they seem to register on their noggins.
There is a connection, both Lucent and Lucifer got their names from the same Latin root for light. Lucifer is the light carrier (lux ferre), and lucent is actually the Latin suffix form of the word.
Lucent isn’t actually “in charge” of the lab. Lucent is the name they gave it when they spun Bell Labs off into its own company.
Have a great day!
Come back soon!
“My point was that Friedman made a statement that can never be proven wrong. Hundreds of Area 51 employees could come forward and say they never saw anything, and Friedman could say the exact same thing. It’s a common tactic of conspiracy theorists.”
Not to say I have 100% faith in Stanton Friedman, but what he said, if it were on a more mundane military tech discussion would not get this kind of heat. The statement was not a sensational one, and Friedman may just know more because he’s made it his bread-and-butter to dig into the matter.
“Maybe he should come up with some evidence or eyewitnesses instead of asking us to prove a negative.”
He has written many books and articles, and are completely accessable to the public. If every person asked any question were required to trot out everything they knew every time they made a statement, nobody would get anything done. Especially when the statement are of such a general nature.
This thread is nucking futs.
That’s a cop out. If the facts are on your side you don’t need the fallacy of ad hominems. And shouting about logic mistakes while using logical fallacies just plain doesn’t sell you as someone who should be allowed to register in the noggins. That’s the kind of stuff that makes it easy to call believers nuts.
I believe in possibilities, but I also know the vast majority of “sightings” are from people either hoping for easy cash or just plain too eager for the paranormal to understand the normality of what they’re seeing.
I, too, am an engineer. Some of it is pretty interesting stuff, for sure, but I have yet to see any plausible connection to (non-earth) aliens. Zero.
Quix’s info is interesting to some extent, obvious nuttery in other cases, still, none is anything verified nor verifiable, ever.
There is plenty of research material on this subject that's currently available on the Internet. Nobody is going to waste their time posting a list of website links because skeptics like you wouldn't bother yourself to click on them. If you want to research this subject, you need to take the initiative.
I call it Spirited and Colorful with a flair for egg throwing.
Eaxactly the nasty kind of response I write of! Thank you for helping to prove my point.
If you’re gonna prove your case then you need to PROVE your case. “I’m not going to waste time presenting the evidence” just plain doesn’t cut it.
There's a lot of porn and scammers on the internet, too. I don't think I'd use that argument too hard.
Sorry, my post #95 was meant for Quix and not you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.