Posted on 09/11/2008 11:23:40 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
First there were the matching tattoos, then the public declarations of love and now it seems Lindsay Lohan will marry her lesbian lover.......[snip]
......[snip] And while dad Michael thinks the pair are just seeking fame and attention which getting married after dating for only a few months obviously proves wrong mum Dina approves.
She was by Lindsay's side as the actress showed off the heart-shaped jewel at a Marie Claire party.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Ultimately, it’s up to the individual as to what road they want to travel.
whew.....skank
it’s too funny how homosexuals actually think they are married.
Like up skank gulch.........
Dang!! I keep getting burned by the Red Heads. First Julia Roberrts marries lyle lovette, now Lindsey Lohan is marrying that guy??? OR wait. Well Which ever I look better than that...and dress better..and AM a REAL GUY not a woman trying to be one! SO lindsay look me up...hahahahaha
Career move.
Like ... who cares what Lindsay Lohan does with her life.
Yes, she is a stinky skank. But, hey, once you get past the smell...
OK by me....Im a male lesbian :)
Gee, she was so cute in Parent Trap. Wonder what happened.
it is healthier to get press as a lezbo than a junkie
except , of course maybe she could try acting lessons
Different strokes for different folks.
After seeing photos of the happy couple. We who will be wearing the pants in that family.
Seriously!
Well, so did I.
Great minds....?
And what made you think he'd have a gal pal?
What made you not?
True, be it a road to a normal, healthy, beautiful life, or to a deviant, pathological, disgusting life.
I think it's mostly just dislike for what's regarded as his leftward influence on the Party in general and McCain in particular.
Her parents may be less than stellar, but she’s an adult and has been living on own for many years now. The drugs, booze, and bisexual behvior is all her own lifestyle choices.
They are a good bit “less than stellar”! Mom is out partying with her. The best thing Lohan could do is lose her and dad and get her butt into rehab or other help while she still has some chance at a career.
Funny, I was just reading today a link sent to me by email.... I also thought the title was about Lindsey Graham.
ADDED 08/27/2008:
IS LINDSEY GRAHAM’S [ALLEGED] HOMOSEXUALITY A SUITABLE POINT OF DISCUSSION?
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC:
THIS WEBSITE HAS NEVER BEEN, NOR WILL IT EVER BE, USED FOR MAKING ATTACKS BASED ON WHAT ARE, AT THIS TIME, STILL TECHNICALLY UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMORS REGARDING AN INDIVIDUAL’S PURELY PERSONAL LIFE.
This notice is issued in response to multiple allegations against Lindsey Graham and his [allegedly] being homosexual. Frankly, until he is arrested as a result of deviant behavior related to his sex life or he comes out and admits that he is homosexual, Lindsey Graham’s sexuality is not a matter of discussion here.
Please, if for no other reason, realize that such talk is unnecessary. This writer and others associated with this site have been relentlessly harangued by a few individuals about Lindsey Graham’s [allegedly] being a homosexual. We respectfully ask that we all concentrate on the other issues at hand until we know something that would be acceptable in a court of law regarding that matter.
Lindsey Graham’s personal character, his lack of integrity, his abuse of his constitutents, demonstrated bad behavior, and all statements made on any subject on the other hand, are, as they ought to be, subject to public scrutiny. His lack of integrity, his betrayals of our country and U.S. citizens, his sucking up (figuratively) to McCain, racist amnesty groups, and the corporate welfare lobbyists are all well documented.
Conveniently enough, Graham, when given any opportunity, will again and again make a spectacle of himself and give the game away to those who are at least halfway awake and paying attention. Graham is as evil and as self-centered a politician as we have seen in this state in a long time. We need go no further than his public behavior and statements in attacking him.
That all being said, I feel morally obligated to make clear the statements I have made to some individuals of varying political persuasions in the past regarding Lindsey Graham allegedly being homosexual: To the best of my knowledge based on my trust of the sources of information involved who knew/knows Lindsey Graham personally, I firmly believe the statements made by the sources to be factual.
Does that make them factual in an absolute sense? No, of course not. I am not omniscient nor omnipotent and can’t point to a time and place in the fabric of the universe that demonstrates the point objectively.
However, the fact that I can not prove it to be true in the most absolute terms does not make it untrue either. I believe it based on my experience and judgment. Technically, it’s impossible to SCIENTIFICALLY judge the veracity of the statements made to me. Therefore, I do not pursue such allegations in some sort of “witch hunt” no matter how believable the testimony involved may be.
As an individual, however, I feel that am under no obligation to keep quiet about what evidence I may have come across on the matter when discussing such matters with other individuals. That’s an important factor regarding freedom of speech when it comes to public figures and I will not muzzle myself on any subject when talking with others.
I apologize for belaboring what should be obvious points. I can’t for reasons of confidentiality reveal my sources but felt it necessary to explain any rumors that may have inadvertently been attributed to this writer as the source. Please be assured that I am not the source and do not wish to pursue this line of attack on anyone and hope that the readers of this site will take the same course of action.
Ohhhh Papasmurf! That was BAAAAAD (ok, but i’m laughing)
Is he pregnant?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.