Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great Planet Debate
Science News ^ | Friday, August 15th, 2008 | Ashley Yeager

Posted on 09/08/2008 7:24:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

...planetary scientist Mark Sykes... director of the Planetary Science Institute headquartered in Tucson, Ariz., is one of many scientists calling for a definition of the word "planet" other than the IAU definition. A planet in the solar system, the IAU says, must: orbit the sun; have enough gravity to make it nearly round; and have gobbled up or sent packing any objects found in its orbit. A dwarf planet, under IAU rules, is not a planet. The IAU says a dwarf planet orbits the sun, is not a satellite, has enough mass to make itself nearly round and has not booted objects from its orbit. But how can a dwarf of something not be considered one of that thing? Sykes asked... He is selecting the part of the IAU definition that he finds useful, arguing that a planet is anything that orbits a star, doesn't fuse elements in its core and has enough internal gravity to be nearly round. Those criteria would make Ceres a planet. It would remake Pluto one too. There would be at least 13 planets in the solar system with many more, possibly thousands to come, he said. The thousands would lie in the Kuiper Belt, the ring of planet-like chunks of rock and ice in Pluto's neighborhood.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: xplanets
The Great Planet Debate POSSIBLE PLANETS -- Ceres (top) is thought of as a planet to some and Vesta (bottom) could be too. The International Astronomical Union does not define the two asteroids or even Pluto as a planet, but planetary scientists are pushing to perhaps have the organization change that idea. Vesta: NASA, ESA, L. McFadden, J.Y. Li, M. Mutchler, Z. Levay, P. Thomas, J. Parker, E.F. Young, C.T. Russell, B. Schmidt Ceres: NASA, ESA, J. Parker, P. Thomas, L. McFadden, M. Mutchler, Z. Levay

1 posted on 09/08/2008 7:26:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I’m totally against it. It would be like making Switzerland and Luxembourg permanent members of the UN. It would be like making Rhode Island a state!

Never mind.


2 posted on 09/08/2008 7:34:53 PM PDT by webheart (All sarcasm contained in this post is intentional, and does not necessarily reflect a real opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Great (and Sometimes Serious) Debate About Pluto
LiveScience | August 15, 2008 | Jeanna Bryner
Posted on 08/17/2008 10:16:27 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2063324/posts

also found on Space.com:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080805-st-planet-debate.html


3 posted on 09/08/2008 7:37:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To Pluto -- And Far Beyond "To Pluto And Far Beyond" By David H. Levy, Parade, January 15, 2006 -- We don't have a dictionary definition yet that includes all the contingencies. In the wake of the new discovery, however, the International Astronomical Union has set up a group to develop a workable definition of planet. For our part, in consultation with several experienced planetary astronomers, Parade offers this definition: A planet is a body large enough that, when it formed, it condensed under its own gravity to be shaped like a sphere. It orbits a star directly and is not a moon of another planet.
The artist's concept gives a view of the Pluto system from the surface of Nix or Hydra, two of its moons discovered in 2005. Nix and Hydra are two to three times farther from Pluto than its large moon, Charon (to the right of Pluto), which was discovered in 1978. Credit: NASA, ESA and G. Bacon (STScI). The Great (and Sometimes Serious) Debate About Pluto

4 posted on 09/08/2008 7:40:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart

;’)


5 posted on 09/08/2008 7:41:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I think that planets should be able to self identify. Being designated a dwarf planet might be damaging to the planet’s self-esteem. Unless, of course, the planet sees itself as a dwarf planet and is more comfortable aligning itself with other dwarf planets.


6 posted on 09/08/2008 7:45:09 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Pluto will always be a planet.
You can’t change the designation just because a bunch of Euro-weenies and intellectuals say different. They are the same people who believe in man-made globaal warming.


7 posted on 09/08/2008 8:01:58 PM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

We think alike. :’)


8 posted on 09/08/2008 8:18:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: webheart
I’m totally against it. It would be like making Switzerland and Luxembourg permanent members of the UN. It would be like making Rhode Island a state!

It would be like making a community organizer from Illinois with little experience a US Senator ... oh. Never mind...

9 posted on 09/08/2008 8:18:43 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Well, it is the dawning of the age of aquarius...


10 posted on 09/08/2008 8:18:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

Yeah, I don’t know why the new rule can’t be applied to future discoveries, but Pluto couldn’t just be grandfathered in. They are being too picky about applying the rule completely consistently, and there is really no good reason.


11 posted on 09/08/2008 8:19:59 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson