Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dell Latitude ON - big win for Linux
Internet News ^ | August 14th | Sean Michael Kerner

Posted on 08/16/2008 5:43:25 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

From the "who needs a pre-load when you're embedded" files:

Dude - if you're getting a Dell then you're getting Linux.

No you don't have to order one of those fancy Ubuntu pre-load deals. This is an embedded Linux that will be available on a whole bunch of new Dell Latitude laptops in a feature called Latitude ON. This is a feature that uses an embedded Linux to allow for instant on access to email, calendar and Internet.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.internetnews.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: dell; linux; microsoft; vista
Didn't Microsoft try to create an instant on thing that was a huge flop? Something that involved using an outside LCD on your laptop or something like that? I think it was called slideshow?

Anyways, it was a huge flop. This is unlikely to be, given that Linux based software is actually capable of instant on. MS just can't seem to get rid of the bloat. Plus, I'm sure this doesn't add much to the cost wheras MS stuff costs you arm plus dog.

1 posted on 08/16/2008 5:43:25 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

The MSI Wind laptop comes preloaded with either Windows XP, or Linux. The Linux version is I think $100 cheaper than if it came with XP.

Though I’m just familiar with how XP feels.


2 posted on 08/16/2008 5:48:34 PM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
back in the 80's one of the first laptops had Windows on a chip, same with Lotus and a couple other programs too... real fast for the day
3 posted on 08/16/2008 5:55:39 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

pong


4 posted on 08/16/2008 8:15:03 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (The McCainiac's creed: Death to America by a thousand cuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

5 posted on 08/16/2008 8:25:31 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode
> back in the 80's one of the first laptops had Windows on a chip, same with Lotus and a couple other programs too... real fast for the day

Ummmm, huh?

1. Laptop in the 80's? What brand/model?

2. Windows in the 80's? Windows 1.0? Unusable. It wasn't 2.0 until 1990 and that sucked swamp water too. Windows wasn't real until 3.1 around 1993.

3. Windows on a chip? Whose chip?

I don't get what you said at all....

6 posted on 08/16/2008 8:35:37 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dayglored; Chode
> It wasn't 2.0 until 1990 and that sucked swamp water too. Windows wasn't real until 3.1 around 1993.

I'm off a little. 2.0 was released in 1987. I started playing with it in 1990, so it was probably a later 2.x version.

And 3.1 was 1992, not 1993.

Nevertheless, I'm astonished that there was something called Windows on a chip in the 80's. Tell me more...

7 posted on 08/16/2008 8:41:34 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

I’ve tasted Dell’s Linux support. In fact I’ve sampled their Windows Vista support, as well.

No thanks.


8 posted on 08/16/2008 9:15:08 PM PDT by papasmurf (This space left blank intentionly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
it was in one of the trade mags... instead of loading windows etc on a hard drive it had half a dozen chip sockets and one of chips had the whole windows os on it, same with Lotus. it was the ultimate copy protection scheme.

the thing never took off though. it was supposed to be real fast cause it never had to look at the disk. i only saw the ad a couple times and that was, well, back in the 80's, but i want to say it was called the WinBook. the ad showed the the chip socket bay with the cover off and one of the chips said Lotus on it.

9 posted on 08/16/2008 9:20:24 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; HAL9000

I finally managed to install Ubuntu (from the DVD included in the official book, which states it’s a CD), only took ten tries, four different CPUs, and (on the final machine) five reboots. S’cool.


10 posted on 08/16/2008 9:52:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Windows on a chip...

I seem to remember the same type of thing...a hardwired OS or chip that was to be virus proof, but could be somehow updated at a later date. Sounded like a great idea at the time but nothing came of it.

The old C64 had its OS built in too, but that was little more than Basic.


11 posted on 08/16/2008 10:33:34 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I can assure you that your experience installing Ubuntu is atypical.

Just out of curiosity, would you mind telling which 4 types of PCs you attempted the install on?


12 posted on 08/16/2008 10:40:59 PM PDT by joseph20 (...to ourselves and our Posterity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I’ve had that experience with other Linux distros.

I was hoping that the days of having to recompile the kernel were over, but I had to do that recently.


13 posted on 08/16/2008 10:48:41 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I was hoping that the days of having to recompile the kernel were over, but I had to do that recently.

Really?? Why? What did you need to do that you needed to recompile the kernel?

14 posted on 08/16/2008 11:09:49 PM PDT by MichiganMan (So you bought that big vehicle and now want to whine about how much it costs to fill it? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan
What did you need to do that you needed to recompile the kernel?

Dude - I do it all the time. Just to make sure it's still possible. Linux is verifiable trust.

15 posted on 08/16/2008 11:12:44 PM PDT by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MichiganMan
The Linux Clock Versus VMware
16 posted on 08/16/2008 11:24:10 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

I wouldn’t know how to recompile it; the detailed instructions given didn’t match the downloaded desktop environment, on the one occasion I got the “live CD” to work, which was, uh, frustrating. The other times it gave me some kind of error about how the disk wasn’t available or some such lie. Anyway, I finally used a DVD-equipped CPU (a workplace discard, I think it was a Gateway) to start up and install. After the second to last reboot, the newly installed system went back to 640 mode on the 1280 capable monitor (which had worked during “live” use and during the installation). The included gizmo to set screen resolution only offered one option — 640. So I restarted it once more, and it started up in, and stayed in, 1280 mode.


17 posted on 08/17/2008 1:17:53 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It appears to be fairly easy with Ubuntu -

How To Compile A Kernel - The Ubuntu Way

18 posted on 08/17/2008 1:36:01 AM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joseph20

Three Dells and a Gateway, I think. Maybe one was an Omnitech :’), but I doubt it.


19 posted on 08/17/2008 1:47:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Thanks HAL9000.


20 posted on 08/17/2008 1:51:14 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User
yup, and since it was it was on a chip, it didn't take up any memory either...
21 posted on 08/17/2008 5:33:42 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chode; DeFault User
yup, and since it [C64 OS] was it was on a chip, it didn't take up any memory either...

Not correct. There was a reason that the Commodore 64 powered up and displayed around 32k RAM free. The basic interpreter and kernel were copied from ROM into RAM at power up for execution (fetching instructions from RAM is much faster than ROM) and other parts of RAM were used for OS housekeeping, etc.

The bigger games/programs for the C64 would "kick" the basic interpreter out of RAM to get that space free which required restarting the machine when the program finished.

22 posted on 08/17/2008 7:41:08 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: no-s
Dude - I do it all the time. Just to make sure it's still possible. Linux is verifiable trust.

Oh I've done it a couple times myself, but I only did so to see how to do it. Its rare these days to find occasions that one needs to recompile the kernel.

23 posted on 08/17/2008 7:48:00 AM PDT by MichiganMan (So you bought that big vehicle and now want to whine about how much it costs to fill it? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: whd23
and now, thankfully, memory problems are now mere memories...
24 posted on 08/17/2008 8:00:30 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User

Mac, Amiga and Atari ST all had the full OS on a ROM back then. I remember you could run Mac on the ST if you had the Mac ROMs in a cartridge (both were M68K systems, but the ST was clocked a bit higher).


25 posted on 08/17/2008 8:37:36 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
asus martin_fierro
Google
(you mentioned an Asus to me last year, in thread)
26 posted on 08/17/2008 9:07:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Asus EE PC: When The Price Is As Small As The Wireless Laptop
(Hot New Holiday Toy Alert)
UK Telegraph | 10/27/2007 | Claudine Beaumont
Posted on 11/28/2007 8:28:36 PM PST by goldstategop
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1932086/posts

Company claims to sell Mac clone for $399
Ars technica | April 14, 2008 | Charles Jade
Posted on 04/14/2008 8:45:24 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts
35 posted on 04/14/2008 7:46:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2001346/posts?page=35#35

Macs Run Windows Vista Better Than PCs, Popular Mechanics Says So
Information Week | 17 April 2008 | Antone Gonsalves
Posted on 04/19/2008 4:29:09 AM PDT by big’ol_freeper
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2003900/posts


27 posted on 08/17/2008 9:10:19 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson