Skip to comments.
Poll: Do you agree with former men's lacrosse coach Mike Pressler's decision to sue the University?
The Duke Chronicle ^
| 10/16/07
| The Chronicle
Posted on 10/16/2007 12:01:12 PM PDT by MrEdd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: dynachrome
41
posted on
10/16/2007 1:21:28 PM PDT
by
BJClinton
(Don't taze me, bro!)
To: MrEdd
Yes yes yes yes yes ... but then I repeat myself. Duke University was absolutely reprehensible in firing the coach even before all the evidence was in .... they would not wait until court .... I hope he sues the president of the college and all 81 of those professors >AND< Nafong for everything they have ..... they denied due process and did not wait for the courts to rule ....
42
posted on
10/16/2007 1:25:09 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("There is no distinctly Native American criminal class...save Congress - Mark Twain")
To: MrEdd
85 percent
Mike’s biggest mistake was not having a father smart enough to be named Krzyzewski. If all things were the same, Duke would have NEVER dumped Krzyzewski.
43
posted on
10/16/2007 1:30:59 PM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
To: MrEdd
Currently 85% yes and 15% no.
I voted yes.
44
posted on
10/16/2007 1:31:45 PM PDT
by
Talking_Mouse
(O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
To: Mamzelle
All I heard was that the University (some official) had made some comments, or into a discussion about the case (or settlement) with someone obviously not supposed to be privy to that information and that is what got out...
There’s probably some more info on that out there somewhere...
All I know is that if you break the deal, all bets are off...
Maybe we can keep watching this thread and see the particulars of this deal...And how its going to be played out...
45
posted on
10/16/2007 1:31:52 PM PDT
by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
To: MrEdd
Currently 85% yes and 15% no.
I voted yes.
46
posted on
10/16/2007 1:31:54 PM PDT
by
Talking_Mouse
(O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
To: freekitty
You mean “bogus” petition, right? I mean, it was a real petition, it was just BS.
47
posted on
10/16/2007 1:31:57 PM PDT
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
To: MrEdd
Duke Klan88 is a disgrace but I found it is funny that they consider personal rants and letters as "scholarly work" and list them in their CV.
div
In reading this post, keep in mind: above all else, the Piot article gives a sense of what is considered a scholarly publication in his field.
The “Piot Principles,” as laid out in his article: 1. Ignore contemporaneous documents, if doing so will advance the metanarrative.
2. Don’t mention conflicts of interest.
3. Even into spring 2007, at least one Duke professor continued to use class time for questionable non-academic activities.
4. In a scholarly publication, authors should avoid citations when making their most difficult-to-sustain points
Indeed, it is listed as a “representative publication” on Professor Piot’s CV.
Also, some Klan 88 profs list books in their CV that have been forthcoming in the last 14 years.
To: MrEdd
Spank ‘em. The bravo sierra from the school’s resident nitwit was not enough. Bury them in legal debt so far the Duke alums ask for the termination of P^3 leadership.
To: MrEdd
Spank ‘em. The bravo sierra from the school’s resident nitwit was not enough. Bury them in legal debt so far the Duke alums ask for the termination of P^3 leadership.
To: Doogle
Yes, those are the idiot racists I want to see sued.
To: MrEdd
You bet; kick the liberal bastards in the groin and then go after the individual faculty members.
52
posted on
10/16/2007 2:16:11 PM PDT
by
MSF BU
To: MrEdd
One hopes that through the litigation those professors and administrators who “convicted” these young men will have their asses dragged through the mud.
To: PAR35
Now it’s at 86% no 14% yes.
To: WashingtonSource
Oops, make that 86% yes, 14% no. Sorry.
To: WashingtonSource
56
posted on
10/16/2007 2:56:30 PM PDT
by
zoomie81
(God Bless Our Military... Duncan Hunter '08)
To: ElkGroveDan
57
posted on
10/16/2007 3:29:43 PM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: stevie_d_64
58
posted on
10/16/2007 3:40:54 PM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: WashingtonSource
The safeguards against multiple voting seem weak.
59
posted on
10/16/2007 4:22:09 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: MrEdd
60
posted on
10/16/2007 4:27:17 PM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson