Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'The Hobbit': Peace in Middle-Earth?
Entertainment Weekly ^ | Oct 04, 2007 | Benjamin Svetkey

Posted on 10/08/2007 12:29:46 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Fans have long dreamed ''Lord of the Rings'' director Peter Jackson would tackle J.R.R. Tolkien's ''The Hobbit,'' but a nasty legal battle with New Line Cinema has made it impossible. Now, at last, a cease-fire may be at hand

(Excerpt) Read more at ew.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: hobbit; newlinecinema; peterjackson
The hard news is that Jackson seems to be winning his lawsuit against New Line Cinema, that the company badly needs a sure moneymaker, and that the hardliners are talking peace. The rumours are that an announcement of Jackson as Director is imminent, and New Line is scouting locations for the Lonely Mountain!
1 posted on 10/08/2007 12:29:48 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ecurbh

After you evaluate this, possibly a Ring Ping would be justified?


2 posted on 10/08/2007 12:31:12 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I couldn't get through any of the Tolkien books, but the movies were terrific. It seems they were made more as action/adventures when a more literary approach might have been interesting, but I like them for what they are.

Can't say as I find the prospect of The Hobbit all that interesting, though. More a kids' story.

3 posted on 10/08/2007 12:38:52 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist Bostonia. If I don't it respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

While it isn’t in this story, there are supposed to be plans for an additional movie, based on the Appendices, which would be about the meeting of the White Council and the spread of the threat of Sauron, essentially a prequel to the LOTR and much darker than the Hobbit.


4 posted on 10/08/2007 12:42:19 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

>>Can’t say as I find the prospect of The Hobbit all that interesting, though. More a kids’ story.<<

The movie will need to be very different from LoTR...

It really is a “there and back” boys adventure story, not a dark and epic struggle for the soul of the world.

Hopefully it won’t turn into YAIA - Yet another Iraq allegory.


5 posted on 10/08/2007 12:44:07 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Hopefully it won’t turn into YAIA

Doesn't seem likely, it isn't Peter Jackson's style! Also it won't be out for a few years, would be a poor idea to use a by then dated plot.

6 posted on 10/08/2007 12:48:05 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I certainly hope you are right.


7 posted on 10/08/2007 12:50:10 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

That sounds interesting, but I’ve kinda had it with prequels. They’re a very dull idea and I can’t think of one that really worked (though the third Star Wars one was ok). I like it better when a story unfolds from the beginning onward, and when it’s over, it’s over. So many of us long for stories to continue, but Hollywood always seems to do them to death. We should learn to let things end, and enjoy our memories, instead of having them swamped by endless retreads that make us forget why we thought these stories special in the first place.


8 posted on 10/08/2007 12:58:05 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist Bostonia. If I don't it respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Yet another Iraq allegory.

Haven't you noticed? Iraq seems to have simmered down, with cooler heads prevailing.

Ergo, it is not presently being discussed in the mainstream media.

When something bad and telegenic happens, they'll be right back on it.

9 posted on 10/08/2007 12:58:11 AM PDT by JennysCool (Don't taze me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
They’re a very dull idea

Well, I don't think that the Robert DeNiro 'prequel' part of The Godfather II was as bad as all that!

10 posted on 10/08/2007 1:02:10 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

But that wasn’t a prequel itself. It used flashbacks to tell parallel stories. Using flashbacks doesn’t make it a prequel.


11 posted on 10/08/2007 1:04:07 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist Bostonia. If I don't it respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is, I guess!


12 posted on 10/08/2007 1:11:24 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Let’s put it this way: You’re the first person I’ve ever encountered who considers Godfather 2 a prequel in any sense. ;)


13 posted on 10/08/2007 1:34:17 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist Bostonia. If I don't it respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; Lucius Cornelius Sulla

J.R.R. Tolkein never liked allegory. Hopefully Jackson and company will take that into account.


14 posted on 10/08/2007 1:42:04 AM PDT by kb2614 (Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Actually Tolkien's ideas and notes on the 3 ages of Middle Earth (the appendices) were written first. This was followed by his plans for The Lord of the Rings, Then The Hobbit was dashed off as a children's story. Then The Lord of the Rings was completed and published. So you see that TLOTR was written as a Sequel to The Hobbit, which was an expansion of the idea which will be made into the 'prequel', which is actually the original story.
15 posted on 10/08/2007 2:11:39 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (IF TREASON IS THE QUESTION, THEN MOVEON.ORG IS THE ANSWER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I understand the chronology. I’m just talking about the film as it’s being described in the article, as two movies, putting in material from the appendixes to almost create a new story between the books Hobbit and Fellowship.


16 posted on 10/08/2007 2:15:13 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist Bostonian. If I don't it respond it might be because you sent me something stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Sweeeeeet. Thank you for the news!


17 posted on 10/08/2007 4:32:18 AM PDT by Lil'freeper (Don't taze me, bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Well, this is a welcome piece of news!

If PJ is back at the helm, “The Hobbit” is sure to be as close to The Professor’s intent as humanly possible.


18 posted on 10/08/2007 5:15:42 AM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

I read the whole thing... not a lot of hard news, but I like the tone of the rumors!

I don’t want to see it with anyone else.

I’m sure ecurbh’ll ring ping it when he gets up :~)


19 posted on 10/08/2007 5:53:49 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 300winmag; Alkhin; Alouette; ambrose; Anitius Severinus Boethius; artios; AUsome Joy; ...

Ring Ping!!

Anyone wishing to be added to or removed from the Ring-Ping list, please don't hesitate to let me know.

20 posted on 10/08/2007 6:14:06 AM PDT by ecurbh (Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh

Great news!

Thanks for the ping!


21 posted on 10/08/2007 6:32:55 AM PDT by Monkey Face (It's time for halloween, so practice safe hex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Good point.


22 posted on 10/08/2007 8:08:02 AM PDT by Rocko ( "Where's the global warming? It's freezing in here." -- Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Encouraging news!! It would be nice to see "The Hobbit" on the big screen. Yes, some consider it more of a kids' story, but PJ could render it pretty intense for the screen; especially the Battle of the Five Armies! Heck, folks brought their younger kids to see the Rings movies, I don't see them holding them back from The Hobbit!
23 posted on 10/08/2007 8:21:28 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
It really is a “there and back” boys adventure story, not a dark and epic struggle for the soul of the world.

For a YA, The Hobbit brought the publisher back to Tolkien quickly, demanding more. I suspect a lot of adults read it too, and someone saw potential for a more significant story set in the same universe. Tolkien rummaged through his never-finished Silmarilion, and found an era where he could shoe-horn in some Hobbits, and write a bigger story. The rest, they say, is literary history.

I have to admit, even after a half-dozen readings, I'm turned off by the childish exposition of the first few chapters of The Hobbit. But the tone changes, and things get more "interesting" after that.

I'm convinced that Peter Jackson was the right person at the right time to do what was considered the impossible: actually make a movie that could tell the story as best as could be done in 12 hours of film. If PJ doesn't do The Hobbit, I'll wait to see it for free on cable some day.

Jackson made Newline billions. You'd think having him do more of the same would be a no-brainer. But there is no such thing as a "no-brainer" when it comes to Hollywood.

24 posted on 10/08/2007 9:28:29 AM PDT by 300winmag (Life is hard! It is even harder when you are stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
Yep, leave it to Hollywood to screw up a good thing... Here's hoping Peter is back at the helm of The Hobbit.
25 posted on 10/08/2007 2:00:44 PM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) I’m paranoid. The only question is, am I paranoid enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh

YES! Last night the Indians beat the Yanks, and now this news.... life is good.

Thanks for the ping, I hope they “do it right.”


26 posted on 10/09/2007 7:15:28 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch (Rush Limbaugh, the Winston Churchill of our time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson