Posted on 06/24/2007 4:33:37 PM PDT by blam
I see. It’s a baby.
Hi Blam
Any 20th century anthropological studies on this type of male behavior toward the mother and unborn?
This type of horror seems to be increasing - or appear to be.
I did find this feminist/cloning crepe at: http://home.att.net/~celesten/clone.html
“””For the first time the average American man was permitted a wide latitude of emotions and other forms of personal self-expression that under the unchallenged patriarchal system caused a man to be ostracized. He can now relate intimately to childrearing and even to childbearing, grow his hair long, cry, be a sexual object, talk about relationships, expect a degree of economic co-support from his spouse. For the average man of the fifties, such male freedoms were unthinkable. When the issue of patriarchy is once again addressed (as it must be), it will require the resources of many men as well as many women to fight for reproductive and other freedoms. Hey man, the gender revolution was and is about you as much as about anyone else! No one wants to get rid of fatherhood. It is patriarchy that has to go. For those who hoped for and fought for a new authentic gender freedom, the tide has turned and the waters are receding.””
_________________________________________
Better bring back the draft!!!!
News reports say he separated from his wife in 2003. He just never got an official divorce. Jessie may not have even known he was officially still married
OK, cross out that line. Replace it with, when she got pregnant with the second baby and the father refuses to make a legal pact with her, she should have run to the nearest exit.
I guess my point is that this woman placed herself in the position where this could have happened to her.
Think of her standing in the middle of a freeway. Does the driver that hits her get away with it? No. Does she bear a fair bit of responsibility for placing herself in a dangerous position by not taking heed of the rules not to walk in the middle of freeways? Absolutely.
If feel horrible for the babies. They chose none of this. The stupid behavior of the “adults” made them orphans.
I don't know. My first thought was that she was killed because she was going to insist that he actually help support his own kids.
“””My first thought was that she was killed because she was going to insist that he actually help support his own kids”””
Do you expect another think coming?
Do you kill your plumber when his bill is due?
Bad Blam;)
Most places, if a woman goes on welfare, the government will come after the fathers for child support. It would have been a non-trivial amount of cash that would have been garnished from his paycheck for the next 18 years
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.