Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

For all of my fellow numbers nerds. Enjoy
1 posted on 05/08/2007 5:57:20 AM PDT by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: murdoog
Sunday morning at three minutes and four seconds after 2 a.m., it will be exactly 02:03:04 05/06/07.

Interesting since the article was published after the fact.

2 posted on 05/08/2007 6:00:30 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog

I always insert mathmatical notation between the numbers so they form an equation.

The time is 9:00. As easy equation is (9 * 0 = 0). Now it’s 9:01, which is (9^0=1).


3 posted on 05/08/2007 6:02:00 AM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog

Do you get excited when your odometer reaches 66666.6?


4 posted on 05/08/2007 6:02:32 AM PDT by Deguello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog

And when it’s 11:11 — well, it just doesn’t get much better than that.

@@@@@

I was at a lacrosse game on Sunday, and just had to say “hey, look” when the score board read 11:11 [remaining] and a score of 11 - 4. Another 4 on the board for 4th quarter rounded out the symmetry.


5 posted on 05/08/2007 6:03:53 AM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scripter

ping!


7 posted on 05/08/2007 6:04:37 AM PDT by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog
02:03:04 05/06/07

Much of the world will have to wait until June 5 for this.

8 posted on 05/08/2007 6:05:27 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog

While this particular set: 02:03:04 05/06/07 is rare, the theme is not. Next we’ll have 03:04:05 06/07/08, and a similar data point every year.


10 posted on 05/08/2007 6:06:40 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog
it will be exactly 02:03:04 05/06/07

No, it will be (was) 2:03.04 on 5/6/2007. We don't generally put zeroes in front of those numbers, and why subtract 2000 from the year?

Further, this isn't really that "cool" because, why are the quantities written in that order? Hours minutes seconds days months years? Wouldn't small-to-big or big-to-small be more logical? But then you'd have

2007-05-06, 2:03.04

or

4 sec 3 min 2 hr, 6th day 5th month of 2007

neither of which is that cool.

20 posted on 05/08/2007 8:02:28 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: murdoog
I cannot resist a little self-promotion here. Below is a link to one of my own excursions into number nerdery.

Numbers other than 37

21 posted on 05/08/2007 8:19:04 AM PDT by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson