Skip to comments.
Against zotting...
Posted on 07/25/2006 9:55:01 PM PDT by Philistone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 last
To: Philistone
Why don't you read up on these concepts:
Free Speech
Private Property
And then get back to us, mkay?
121
posted on
07/25/2006 11:50:03 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: Danae
There are worse things than a ZOT.
Ask Arthur McGowan.
122
posted on
07/26/2006 12:03:09 AM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: burzum
Liberals talk other liberals out of being liberal.Happened to me that way. Happened to many ex-liberal Freepers that way as well.
123
posted on
07/26/2006 12:11:55 AM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: Philistone
ZOTs are well deserved around here because of the idiots who post them.
Most ZOT thread starters post to start flame wars, puff their vanity or just show how stupid they are so - ZOT.
I got no problem with how the mods handle things.
124
posted on
07/26/2006 2:57:49 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Thanks...I need to get a new pic on the page...although I am seriously considering removing the kids' pics, due to some...shall we say, jerks, using them for cheap shots at me.
125
posted on
07/26/2006 5:02:26 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: abishai
126
posted on
07/26/2006 5:02:55 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: Philistone
I got banned when I first signed up as well.
It was back when Nick Berg was beheaded. I wondered in writing why a Jew was wandering around an Islamic war-zone by himself. A poster commented that Berg wasn't a Jew. I then posted a link that confirmed that he was indeed Jewish. The poster them posted my sign-up date and pinged the Admin. I was then banned.
127
posted on
07/26/2006 9:22:21 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(I'm worth a million in prizes.)
To: Danae
glad you came along. 25 posts before someone without the knee JERK ibtz showed up.
To: Philistone
Recently, a FReeper put forward the notion of a "probationary period" before being allowed to post. Uh, that would be me: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1662832/posts?page=20#20
I think anybody who signed up before about 1999 should be free to post.
Your thoughts?
129
posted on
07/26/2006 5:53:45 PM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
To: Hebrews 11:6
Waiting for me to stick my foot in my mouth? ;-)
While I quite agree that FR should maintain its status as a family friendly site and that anyone who discusses or posts pornography should be zotted, it should be remembered that there are two somewhat contradictory forces at work here.
On the one hand, is the force of exclusion and inclusion: the site is a conservative and should remain so.
On the other hand, Jim makes money off the site and the site gains notariety and press based on the number of users and visitors.
130
posted on
07/26/2006 6:31:02 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: Philistone; Jim Robinson
It is good manners to ping someone when you talk about them.
131
posted on
07/26/2006 6:40:42 PM PDT
by
DocRock
To: DocRock
I wouldn't dream of imposing on Mr. Robinson's time for something this trivial.
132
posted on
07/26/2006 6:45:43 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: Philistone
This is just my ever-so-humble opinion........
I might speculate that a fair number of the "zottable" posts are probably posted by rank and file dedicated freepers who feel the need to "stir up" the faithful by creating a rallying point of a totally unacceptable and vulgar proclamation. Consider the feeding frenzies that result - several dozen freepers vie for the coveted "ibtz", and sometimes hundreds come forth to "pile on" a seemingly "helpless liberal" who has mistakenly wandered into the vastly superior freeper world. Yes indeed, it makes perfect sense.
133
posted on
07/26/2006 7:03:49 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
To: WhiteGuy
Uhm... you said that out loud...
134
posted on
07/26/2006 7:08:39 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: Philistone
Uhm... you said that out loud...
yeah, does it really matter?
135
posted on
07/26/2006 7:27:53 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
To: WhiteGuy
In the long run, no.
In the short run, depends on your sense of justice and fairness.
136
posted on
07/26/2006 7:31:55 PM PDT
by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: Philistone; Jim Robinson
I have to admit that I haven't studied the finances of FR, but I have the suspicion that JimRob makes little to no money off of FR. The fact that we have quarterly FReepathons tell me that FR isn't quite the money-maker, and JimRob seems to like it that way...FR could have easily become a subscription site, but that wouldn't be as much fun for us troll-hunters...and it's likely that FR wouldn't be half the fun it is right now.
Just my $0.02 worth.
137
posted on
07/26/2006 10:31:00 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
(There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
To: Philistone
Jim makes money off the siteHe earns a decent living through his salary as administrator, which represents the opportunity cost of him not pursuing some other venture; but this seems to be anything but a goldmine for him.
the site gains notariety and press based on the number of users and visitors.
FR gains notoriety and press based on its adherence to, and implementation of, Jim's conservative philosophy, which is what attracts its posters. By now, ten years into its life, any change to its exclusiveness, if that is what you are promoting, would drive away those many of us who come to FR as a conservative refuge from the liberal-dominated mainstream culture.
138
posted on
07/27/2006 4:44:04 AM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
To: Philistone
Many here agree with you. However, many more enjoy posting their "funny" zot graphics, and the feelings of inclusion and superiority that come with piling on in a zot thread. All that fun without having to actually think and debate.
It won't change.
139
posted on
07/27/2006 4:58:19 AM PDT
by
Washi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson