Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DA plans to turn over more papers in lacrosse case (DukeLax)
The Herald-Sun ^ | June 22, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 06/22/2006 2:23:47 AM PDT by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 2,061-2,065 next last
To: Locomotive Breath

This stuff is unbelievable.

Nifong doesn't know where the Rape kit is located?


501 posted on 06/22/2006 1:47:46 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Peach

somehow Nifong managed to say "Bunnyhole" without smirking.


502 posted on 06/22/2006 1:48:30 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: abb

Who knows where they come up with it. That's why this scrutiny is so necessary. Our attorney asked to have the case moved from a judge his office had a "history" with. We got another judge for the preliminary. I don't know what the defense can do in NC, as this is so bizzarre in terms of what the defense can have access to. We were able to depose -- in NC they can't even look at the police interviews.


503 posted on 06/22/2006 1:48:45 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: abb
The weak link is the media now.

The media is always the weak link in everything. They don't take as much pride in their work as we take in our posting. They are a embarrassment.
504 posted on 06/22/2006 1:48:55 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong; All

One thing is troubling me and I can't remember it clearly.

Did LIEfong say that Gottlieb, Himan, and himself met with CGM but it wasn't related to the case, therefore there are no notes of this conversation???

Did I hear that correctly? If so, that is absurd on its face. All three of them need to be put under oath.


505 posted on 06/22/2006 1:49:17 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Carling

Nifong says that's attorney work product and therefore priveleged. I think.


506 posted on 06/22/2006 1:50:13 PM PDT by abb (If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: abb
Nifong says that's attorney work product and therefore priveleged.

I would love to see that work.

507 posted on 06/22/2006 1:51:22 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: maggief

My take is that Cheshire will be paid back in court for being so vocal. Who cares about his client?

"They don't want to mess with me"

We might have seen a bit of what he meant. Cheshire was slapped down each time he opened his mouth, even before he finished a sentence.

Did we ever hear what Nifong's threat was that was alluded to last week? I heard Nifong had an outburst last week in front of the newsreporters....have not read about it.


508 posted on 06/22/2006 1:51:36 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: abb

Nancy Grace saying AV inconsistancies to be expected


509 posted on 06/22/2006 1:52:09 PM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: abb

What??? Attorney work product??? This is a criminal investigation, not contract review.


510 posted on 06/22/2006 1:52:12 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Greta might be right when she wondered if Nifong is insane or evil.


511 posted on 06/22/2006 1:52:20 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: abb

Christ! Karas just "explained" away Crystal's inconsistency about being raped by 20 guys. Karas suggests that police "got it wrong" and that Crystal meant that there were 20 guys in the room when she was performing.

This is reporting???


512 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:02 PM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
Nancy Grace saying AV inconsistancies to be expected

Nancy mentioning the DNA "under" the nail with Beth.

513 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:13 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: abb
Nifong says that's attorney work product and therefore priveleged. I think

LIEfong is representing the state, not CGM, but I suppose the argument could be made. However, this privilege certainly does not extend to Himan and Gottlieb.

IS THIS WHY GOTTLIEB'S NOTES ARE STILL MISSING?

514 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:16 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

Next we will hear him claim "Executive Priviledge"


515 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:25 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"100K is still too high, IMO."

I guess if he has killed someone it would have been reduced to $25,000... :-)

516 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:32 PM PDT by TommyDale (Stop the Nifongery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

NGB over to another case. She couldn't wait to get off this one. She's tranked...


517 posted on 06/22/2006 1:53:47 PM PDT by abb (If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: abb

First time I've heard NGB refer to AV as "alleged victim".


518 posted on 06/22/2006 1:55:01 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: abb

My summary:

So far nothing really new.

Nifong has no tox report.

The SANE report is not going to change.

AV was not tested or treated at Duke Access.

Defense will get AV's cellphone data.

Bond dropped to 100K for Seligmann.

Nifong still has no case....


519 posted on 06/22/2006 1:55:13 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: abb

None of the networks really wanted to cover this today. What was it, just Court TV and MSNBC?


520 posted on 06/22/2006 1:55:35 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 2,061-2,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson