Posted on 06/02/2006 9:20:09 AM PDT by Hat-Trick
The season has been expanded to the point where normal seasons won't end until the end of May, and this was an Olympic year with a two week stoppage in February.
The NBA season is going to end even later and they don't even have the Olympics as an excuse. Baseball season is just as long. When a league's not playing an league's not earning, except for the NFL which finds a way to get networks to pay to cover almost everything.
I long for the day when all of those hockey teams in silly markets like North Carolina, Texas, Georgia, Florida, etc. just disappear.
No high profile players? So Chris Pronger and Rod Brind'Amour are nobodies? Of course the real punchline is that post season success is one of the keys to a player becoming high profile.
If you get the days you long for say goodbye to the NHL. The league needed to expand beyond the traditional market. Sure the old days of the league were nice if you lived in the snowbelt, but the population of the country is moving out of the snowbelt and the league needed to follow. And the Carolina and Texas teams make good money, better than Buffalo and some of the other teams in "traditional" NHL markets. Attendance was up league wide this year, revenue significantly better than projected, just gotta fix the TV situation.
If you get the days you long for say goodbye to the NHL. The league needed to expand beyond the traditional market. Sure the old days of the league were nice if you lived in the snowbelt, but the population of the country is moving out of the snowbelt and the league needed to follow.
This is one reason why collegiate hockey games often attract bigger TV audiences than the Stanley Cup finals. When you have national championship games involving teams like Boston College, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Lake Superior State, etc. you never have to convince fans that it makes sense for these teams to be playing on a sheet of ice for a winter sport.
And the Carolina and Texas teams make good money, better than Buffalo and some of the other teams in "traditional" NHL markets.
That's a good point. Keep in mind, though, that you are comparing teams from two of the fastest-growing metro areas in the U.S. with a team from a city that has been most aptly described for years as a poverty-stricken dump.
What's wrong with them being marquee players? They're good, they're tough, Pronger is photogenic, they've put up good numbers their whole career, they give good interview. They should be marquee players. The only reason they're not truly marquee players is that hockey isn't really a marquee sport, it's never gotten the kind of press coverage for more than 1 or 2 players to be known outside of hockey fandome.
Collegiate hockey numbers aren't that good. It's not a matter of convincing the fan, it's a matter of having the fan to convince.
That's my point, all the fastest growing metro areas are in the sunbelt now. That's the place where it's going to be easiest to grow a fanbase, between transplanted existing fans and just general population growth there's more potential to improve the fan base for the whole sport in places like NC and Dallas and Atlanta than in New York state, Chicago or Minnesota. If the league restricts itself to just the snowbelt it will die with the snowbelt, it needs to expand and turn non-traditional hockey markets into hockey markets. Football had to go through the same thing when it moved out of the "football swath" of industrial and South Eastern America. A lot of teams struggled, a lot of teams failed, but eventually they managed to make the game stick. To be a truly national league they need to make it a truly national game, that means following the population and getting out of the frozen north, if the NHL is ever going to move out of a distant 4th (and really with the rise of NASCAR one can argue it's not a distant 5th) it needs to make the southern expansion work. If it bails on the southern expansion hockey stops being a major league sport.
Hee-hee-hee.... I understand. You're just upset that you embarassed yourself with your conference finals prediction thread and your Devils took the big one right up the ol' wazoo. Yup, Devils in 5, Devils coming out of the East... tough to beat Brodeur this time of year...
BTW... We have cheerleader babes in the stands because we can. The Meadowlands are still looking for cheerleaders but they are having trouble luring them away from the trough over at the harness track.
Well, I long for the day that you pack up all your relatives and haul them back to New Jersey. Heck, their the ones buying all the season tickets down here.
Me too ... I'm old enough to remember the old NHL era ... Montreal, Toronto, Detroit, Chicago, New York, Boston (think I got'em all) ... of course in those days the teams traveled mostly by train or bus. In that era, before helmets and goalie's wearing face masks for protection, it was rare for a hockey player to make the NHL ranks until well seasoned in the minors. Typically a player was at least twenty-one, usually twenty-three or older before making it into the NHL.
I give your team credit, they're good. But you've got no business talking smack about the Devs yet. Call me in a decade or after winning three cups. Which ever comes first.
Let's have Canada win one.
SD
Go Oil!!!
(at least this way the Cup goes to the team that embarrassed mine!!)
You know, I was going to root for the Hurricaines until I read this post - but now I hope they get greased.
BTW - how many cups do y'all 'n yer cuzins have down thar? Or for that matter did the Whale have?
Don't kid yourself, we obviously have done quite well without them. If your [candy]'Canes win the Cup, you'll soon discover how hard it is to keep it. When every team in the leauge is gunning for you, and the pressure of defending/repeating is ever present, we'll see how the [candy]'Canes hold up. One thing the Devils have proven is that they are arguably the most consistently successful team in the league over the last 10+ years.
Face it, that's all you have right now is the past. You inherited your team thirty years ago and suffered through more seasons before you even sniffed the Stanley Cup than the Hurricane fans have even had seasons. A lot of good those 3 Stanley Cups did this year, huh? The interesting part is that, generally speaking of course, the true southerners down here couldn't give a damn whether the Canes win or lose and we STILL whooped your @$$.
This game is way too easy.
But, I will go easy on you guys. You are doing what you can to make the best of it, what with you living in New Jersey and all... ;-)
All on my account? Bless your heart!
GO WHALERS!
(heh heh)
>>I've liked 'em ever since they moved to Carolina. Don't know why. Just do.
Funny I liked them BEFORE they moved to Carolina. Way back to WHA days.
Speaking of which, this is the first Stanley Cup final with two WHA teams, only one of which is still in their original city.
What a game! The old school teams couldn't beat the atmosphere in the RBC tonight!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.