Visible Panty Lines: another great divide

Newsday ^ | 12/2005 | Amy Dickinson

[Maximus of Texas]

Good. Strong. Post.

[Maximus of Texas]

"I wear something slinky to a special event..."

Hey, RQ, I guess our lunch with PB wasn't special!

[dhs12345]

Wow! My wife and I discussed this at length the other day.

My wife explained that if you can see panty lines, then it is the same as seeing a woman's underwear. I suggested not wearing any underwear at all -- that didn't go over very well.

I just added it to the list of how differently men and women see the world.

[MadCharity]

The top of the thong, where it extends above the beltline of low-cut pants.

I hate that look, it appears trashy.

Panty lines should not be seen (from a female standpoint) on anyone imho.

[supercat]

My wife explained that if you can see panty lines, then it is the same as seeing a woman's underwear.

It seems there are two types of VPL: those where the undergarment itself is visible, and those where the position of the undergarment's edges can be ascertained through other clothing. Quite different, IMHO.

[Moleman]

your fired for posting that pic.

[dhs12345]

Wow! It has its own acronym. I have been living a sheltered life.

Also, learned a new word from my wife -- frumpy. Yes, it is a real word.