We do! We do!
Posted on 07/20/2004 1:45:03 PM PDT by jesterbr549
Its nonsense. The same bs made the rounds before the last election, and they were wrong...unless Bush changed his name to Gore while I wasn't looking.
Ya really are a jester, arncha.
Wanna bet this jester speaks French? I hope so. I want to know the French word for "surrender".
ROTFLMAO!!
We do! We do!
"the Throne in England has been putting the more 'noble' candidate in office in America for about 200 years"
Funny, there was the American Revolution, AND the War of 1812.
I also seem to recall that the British army surrendered to US both times.
He probably speaks Belgian French..
To Scott - If we controlled the Crown, the Peerage system would not be affecting the elections in this Country. The FACT that it is, proves just the opposite. Burke's Peerage is the expert in the field and they are certainly not lying and ABC News are an acknowledged leader in the field and they, obviously, are not lying either.
If the Queen of the Dorks had taken the time to read the article from ABC News, he would have seen that Bush was elected because his blood was bluer than Gores. They were not wrong - you are. I remind you that Heraldry is a SCIENCE and is admissable in a court of Law as EVIDENCE.
Obviously you don't know facts when they are presented to you. You think the only governmental corruption is in the Democratic camp and, therefore, it is much easier for you to leave you head in the sand (and your surrendered arses in the air), then to do something about the situation. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem and, obviously, you are certainly not part of the solution.
I recommended you read Stephen Ames' (the Political Prisoner) material on the Queen giving orders that affect the Social Security payments you all still make to the Throne.
And, I hate to disappoint you but I don't speak French and, in fact, I am assuredly more American that you will ever be...
I'm not Scott, thank you very much.
The fact that you're believing something that has been proven to be bunk shows something, but I doubt you'll figure out what.
I suppose next you'll tell us that you're more conservative than the rest of us as well.
A 'true conservative' perhaps?
ABC News is a liar's union who'd say whatever they needed to say to spin a John Kerry win.
ABC has suppressed news that would harm their position.
IF you were a conservative, or even knew any facts at all, you'd be hesitant to quote ABC as a source for anything factual or expert.
Show facts.
How much royal blood have the presidents had versus their opponents?
Is that just a typo or do you always assume that "queen" is a reference to something other than female royalty?
I don't give a damn what the article states. I have been following politics actively since I was in the single digits and I can assure you, the peerage nonsense is just that--nonsense. Before the debacle that was the 2000 elections, Gore was picked out to be the winner because he had the bluest blood. If you have the next week free, I can give you a crash course in genealogy, including a specific two-day seminar on the genealogical inaccuracies of Burke's. Genealogy could be considered a science. Burke's version of genealogy couldn't be considered a science whatsoever.
I remind you that Heraldry is a SCIENCE and is admissable in a court of Law as EVIDENCE.
Are you writing to us from across the merrie little pond? American courts rely on DNA. Cite me one single case in the US which occurred in the last, oh, let's say 30 years which proves me wrong.
Should we put alert RKBA to be on stand by?
Standby with malice.
And bring extra garrotes.
Call up the kitties!
ROTFLMAO! Tinfoil is in this year. I heard it from Burke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.